A memoir of bisexuality and Epping Forest – two things of which I'm generally all in favour, but which are off the menu for the foreseeable. Despite which, I'd spent a while reluctant to read this one, not least because I'd not long since read another Epping Forest midlife crisis book by someone with a background in music, Will Ashon's Strange Labyrinth, which had won me over among other things with how deliberately and knowingly bathetic it is. Whereas this, I'd got the impression, took itself much more seriously. That was not a misconception; it's clearly been written de profundis, and comes with all the problems attendant on that sincerity. One friend mentioned having seen it compared to Alan Partridge: Nomad, which in a sense is unfair – part of the cruel brilliance of Nomad is that after you've read it, every 'personal journey' book you read, certainly any by a male writer anywhere near the middle of life, feels at least a little bit Nomad. But there's definitely a straining for effect in parts of this, and a very pat 'dignity of manual labour' ending just like the ones which spoil Office Space or Jay McInerney novels, not to mention some hilariously contorted formulations like "Heterosexual and homosexual gay-porn sites", or "homophobic gay bashers", from which a kinder or more attentive editor should really have rescued Turner.
But of course, writing stuff like that in the first place is clearly an outgrowth of his long struggle with his sexuality, and so in that sense it's form following content. As he tells it, his life has been a rollercoaster of intense but often furtive gay encounters, interspersed with straight relationships which are in turn upended by what he describes as a compulsion. This began with a schoolboy flirtation with an attractive classmate, but then takes a dark turn when he ends up sucking off an old man in a public toilet at 14. Which, no argument, is a horrible thing to happen and no wonder it's left scars – but there's still something uneasy in the way he talks about how that was seven years under the gay age of consent at the time, as though that law hadn't itself been a barbarous relic which now, thank goodness, seems like an injustice from far longer ago. Equally, the chapter Teenage Lightning expresses unease with the Coil song of that name in particular, and the sexualisation of teenagers in general, despite the fact that mathematically, 'teenager' describes someone legal more often than not. And then elsewhere he talks about "the never-ending paedo panic that is a tabloid-inspired national hobby"! In short, for all that the book is presented as a journey and a reconciliation, he's clearly still working some stuff out, as witness also the use of phrases like "the wasted gift of my body to people who did not deserve it", which sounds like it could come straight out of an abstinence preacher's rhetoric.
This, though, is part of the theme: the way that pervasive homophobia can warp sexuality, at both a society-wide and an individual level, leaving distorted growths much like the mess Epping Forest has ended up with through pollarding being practised for centuries, and then abandoned. The abusive adults were clearly part of this, but so was the society which made gay desire into something hidden and sinful in the first place. Growing up in a deeply religious household was a big part of the problem, but so too was toxic masculinity in general, particularly as manifested in schoolboys. And dear heavens I recognised this bit, being the weird kid who likes Suede and hates PE in a school where popularity is largely measured on sporting prowess, who's much happier out in the local wilderness than trying to negotiate the baffling, thuggish creatures one's peers have become. Turner is very good on the contradictions inherent in fancying some men while also finding many male behavious entirely repulsive, all that bullying and 'banter' – though of course the experience of a girl realising she fancies the bitchy straight girls, certainly back then, probably had more similarities than differences. Towards the end of the book it becomes clear that the bits of Turner's experience I can recognise run even more specific: I was born in the same month as him, a year earlier, and also had an early reluctance to engage in the whole 'breathing' lark to which some have attributed my more distant tendencies in later life. Still, each time a new detail in common ticked past, I just found myself thinking once more, how come I'm so much less fucked up about all this than him? I could only draw two overlapping conclusions: for all that Turner is very complimentary about his parents, mine were a lot better. And/or, religion really does wreck people. Granted, I did have a brief interlude going to a Methodist youth group myself, just because it was a comparatively rare way to see friends in that awkward 'too old for playing out, too young for booze' interlude of life – but even then I had more sense than to take it too seriously, and would already delight in playing a subtly Luciferian role whenever the faith bit came along.
(Oh, and it should hardly need saying anymore where faith groups are involved, but obviously the leader of said youth group was subsequently to end up on a register. Yes, that one)
For all this stuff I recognised so well, though, there were oddly universalising bits elsewhere. Sometimes Turner does row back from these, as when he for a moment appears to be suggesting that everyone finds nocturnal forests scary – I find them overwhelming, true, but that isn't quite the same thing. More definite, and even less recognisable, was the passage where he talks about how bisexual men he meets tend to be with unknowing women who can't ever be allowed to know. Now, we move in overlapping circles, yet mainly bisexual men I know are in relationships with women who complain that the boys are not gaying up anything like often or visibly enough. And this disconnect kept coming back to me whenever he talks about self-destructing his relationships because of his cottaging compulsion. Could he not explore something between promiscuous singledom and monogamous coupledom, find a girlfriend who considers the sordid excursions a bonus? If not, presumably that itself is another manifestation of the faith damage, continuing to tie yourself in knots while ignoring an obvious solution.
All of this may sound like I didn't like the book, but I think I'm frustrated with the backdrop it's struggled out of more than the thing itself. Most first books have their imperfections, and one wrestling with this much baggage is bound to show some drag from them. It still manages to make some very good points too: when Turner talks about the decline of London in terms of the city being infiltrated by the deathliness of Middle England, I'd never thought of the problem quite that way, but it's perfect (and, of course, even more pronounced now everything that made the capital different is as thoroughly shut as the most boring provincial meat market). There's some excellent prose here, and while some of it is in standard nature writing territory, it's none the worse for that: "Across Epping Forest the beeches turned incandescent, the gnarled old pollards were no longer grotesque beasts but intricately carved candelabra holding up the season's fire". A lot of the most powerful passages, though, are regarding the sex, where Turner always succeeds in making it hot, or horrific, or some tangled mixture of the two, according to his intent. Or funny, of course: "a bisexual man seems to be having his cock and eating it". And simply mixing that in with the nature stuff is a radical act, one which has pissed off some number of more prudish nature writing fans. Which is, in and of itself, a good thing. Apart from anything else, what is nature if not the results of fucking, frantically going about the business of doing some more fucking? Above all, I love the line "Bisexuals are perceived to be a threat to heteronormative culture, louche, priapic and oversexed, greedy males for whom any hole's a goal." Well, one tries one's best.