Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Thought Contagion

Rate this book
Fans of Douglas Hofstadter, Daniel Bennet, and Richard Dawkins (as well as science buffs and readers of Wired Magazine ) will revel in Aaron Lynch's groundbreaking examination of memetics -- the new study of how ideas and beliefs spread. What characterizes a meme is its capacity for displacing rival ideas and beliefs in an evolutionary drama that determines and changes the way people think. Exactly how do ideas spread, and what are the factors that make them genuine thought contagions? Why, for instance, do some beliefs spread throughout society, while others dwindle to extinction? What drives those intensely held beliefs that spawn ideological and political debates such as views on abortion and opinions about sex and sexuality? By drawing on examples from everyday life, Lynch develops a conceptual basis for understanding memetics. Memes evolve by natural selection in a process similar to that of Genes in evolutionary biology. What makes an idea a potent meme is how effectively it out-propagates other ideas. In memetic evolution, the "fittest ideas" are not always the truest or the most helpful, but the ones best at self replication. Thus, crash diets spread not because of lasting benefit, but by alternating episodes of dramatic weight loss and slow regain. Each sudden thinning provokes onlookers to ask, "How did you do it?" thereby manipulating them to experiment with the diet and in turn, spread it again. The faster the pounds return, the more often these people enter that disseminating phase, all of which favors outbreaks of the most pathogenic diets. Like a software virus traveling on the Internet or a flu strain passing through a city, thought contagions proliferate by programming for their own propagation. Lynch argues that certain beliefs spread like viruses and evolve like microbes, as mutant strains vie for more adherents and more hosts. In its most revolutionary aspect, memetics asks not how people accumulate ideas, but how ideas accumulate people. Readers of this intriguing theory will be amazed to discover that many popular beliefs about family, sex, politics, religion, health, and war have succeeded by their "fitness" as thought contagions.

208 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1996

13 people are currently reading
326 people want to read

About the author

Aaron Lynch

2 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
20 (14%)
4 stars
35 (25%)
3 stars
47 (33%)
2 stars
22 (15%)
1 star
15 (10%)
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14 reviews
Profile Image for Lieb.
3 reviews
May 30, 2008
What can I say, this is a bad book about an interesting topic: memes. The first chapter is promising but the remainder of the book is a series of poorly conceived examples of "thought contagion" that offer no supporting evidence other than the author's opinions. Lynch's interpretation of memes is mainly focused on ideas that encourage having more children and then indoctrinating those children to believe in the idea. I agree that this is one mechanism of meme propagation but I doubt that this is a major one (at least not on the scale that Lynch believes it is).

Dawkins ( http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61..., http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61... ) and Dennett ( http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20... ) provide better commentaries on the concept of memes and its relationship to evolutionary theory.
Profile Image for Mark Terry.
123 reviews5 followers
May 31, 2010
A very promising start that begins with a very good chapter explaining the concept of "memes," a way of evaluating ideas in biological terms. Memetics (study of memes) assesses the ability of ideas to propogate, develop immunity to changes and other biological concepts. Unfortunately, the subsequent chapters contain a series of examples that don't add any value. Whether the examples were poorly conceived or overly simplified I don't know. And don't really care as the examples didn't add much to my understanding.
Profile Image for Alexander Smith.
257 reviews83 followers
December 21, 2020
This book serves more historically than the "towards a memetic science" point that it suggested at the time it was published. What this book does is offer a few suggestive ways in which a variety of human sciences could adopt memetics relative to their interests in the 1990s. While most of these fields have moved on to adopt or ignore these suggestions, even the concerns of the book are dated to questions that largely have been answered in more detail by other paradigms.

This book's first two chapters are mostly what is useful from the book. It proposes a memetic metaphysics and suggests some ways it could be adopted into other academic paradigms. The following chapters attempt to be more thorough in a variety of areas anthropology that had been suggested within memetics. Most of these topics are no longer a part of memetic discussion but are instead delegated to materialist cultural anthropology and religion and are treated more within the realm of mimesis than memetics.
Profile Image for Nick Burdick.
205 reviews4 followers
September 17, 2019
Booooooo.
This is a book about memetics, which I find fascinating, but it read like an undergraduate term paper written at the last minute. The first chapter has some useful explanations of the different vehicles that memes use to spread. He lays out seven such vehicles, but then he tries to explain his limited choice of subjects—religion, sexual norms, political stripes—by way of only two of them. Most of the rest of the book is nothing but conjectures and poorly thought-out examples. I probably gained more from this book by arguing with it; indeed, the margins are filled with my notes—mostly about counterexamples, fallacies, and flat-out factual errors. I had high hopes, but it turned out to be quite a disappointment. I wish I were better about parting ways with books before they are over; I could have saved myself some precious hours.
Profile Image for Thejessicaness.
105 reviews1 follower
February 19, 2024
This book sums up that writing a review to where someone else doesn't believe it's worth reading is sharing your views in ways you haven't thought of. Society has some strongly felt beliefs because one person had an idea. Sometimes, this group strength can be helpful and save other people time, but other times, it leads people down the path of having as many babies as possible to pass down their beliefs and beat out the competition.
Perhaps the book could be shorter since most reviewers only appreciate the first two chapters; or it could be longer and more thought out. I appreciate the introduction to the topic of just how easily some thoughts spread without people doing their due diligence, because the information comes from those closest to them or supposedly most informed on guns, health, religion, etc., to ensure they're making decisions for the right reasons for themselves.
Profile Image for Andrej Drapal.
Author 4 books17 followers
February 8, 2023
Aaron Lynch makes a great contribution by listing so many examples of memetic fields (meme-complexes, using Susan Blackmore’s term), but he avoids to define mechanisms lying behind a thought contagion. Questions like what is a meme, how it spreads around and what is the ontology of the relation between genes and memes is completely unaddressed. But then: it is a very good overview over the phenomenology of memes.
Profile Image for Samarpan Roy.
2 reviews1 follower
July 4, 2025
Thought Contagion” remains a bold and influential entries in the memetics canon. It reframes belief as a living, replicating entity. Yet, its theoretical generosity comes at the cost of empirical substance. A compelling, if occasionally ungrounded, invitation to rethink how culture spreads.
Profile Image for Tim Mcleod.
51 reviews8 followers
July 7, 2019
Dear Reader, I hated this cut-rate cocktail party banter so much that I recycled the book rather than donate. The other folks have already pointed out its flaws. Wish I'd read them in advance.
Profile Image for Lisa.
61 reviews
March 15, 2016
Not a book for casual reading. This would probably be great research material for the social sciences, or someone who is specifically interested in the field of memetics. The topic is presented dryly, and the writing style is too academic, for casual non-fiction reading. I read a few chapters and then set it down for good.
Profile Image for Jen.
30 reviews
April 19, 2017
The title associated with ISBN 0-465-08467-2 is Thought Contagion: How Belief Spreads Through Society: The New Science Of Memes, just like the cover shows. Interesting read.
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.