What do you think?
Rate this book
Practical Magic #1
Practical Magic
An alternative cover for this ISBN can be found here.
For more than two hundred years, the Owens women have been blamed for everything that has gone wrong in their Massachusetts town. Gillian and Sally have endured that fate as well: as children, the sisters were forever outsiders, taunted, talked about, pointed at. Their elderly aunts almost seemed to encourage the whispers of witchery, with their musty house and their exotic concoctions and their crowd of black cats. But all Gillian and Sally wanted was to escape. One will do so by marrying, the other by running away. But the bonds they share will bring them back—almost as if by magic…
*25th Anniversary Edition*—with an Introduction by the Author!
For more than two hundred years, the Owens women have been blamed for everything that has gone wrong in their Massachusetts town. Gillian and Sally have endured that fate as well: as children, the sisters were forever outsiders, taunted, talked about, pointed at. Their elderly aunts almost seemed to encourage the whispers of witchery, with their musty house and their exotic concoctions and their crowd of black cats. But all Gillian and Sally wanted was to escape. One will do so by marrying, the other by running away. But the bonds they share will bring them back—almost as if by magic…
*25th Anniversary Edition*—with an Introduction by the Author!
304 pages, ebook
First published July 1, 1995
About the author
Alice Hoffman
135 books27.3k followersAlice Hoffman is the author of more than thirty works of fiction, including The World That We Knew; The Marriage of Opposites; The Red Garden; The Museum of Extraordinary Things; The Dovekeepers; Here on Earth, an Oprah’s Book Club selection; and the Practical Magic series, including Practical
Magic; Magic Lessons; The Rules of Magic, a selection of Reese’s Book Club; and The Book of Magic. She lives near Boston.
Magic; Magic Lessons; The Rules of Magic, a selection of Reese’s Book Club; and The Book of Magic. She lives near Boston.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 19,162 reviews
July 19, 2017
*3.75 stars*
I’m a little embarrassed to admit it wasn’t until I read my first Alice Hoffman novel last year (The Museum of Extraordinary Things) that I realized Practical Magic was more than just a swoon-worthy movie I’d watched a dozen times over. With numerous viewings under my belt and the upcoming release of the prequel, The Rules of Magic, I figured now was as good of a time as any to dive in and give this a read. I mean how could I not, the book is always better than the movie, right?
Well, maybe not always. In this instance, I wouldn’t say the movie is necessarily better than the book, I'd say I prefer the movie version. Both are great stories, they’re just completely different.
Raised by their aunts and shunned by their classmates for being witches, sisters Gillian and Sally struggled to find their own versions of happiness. Gillian has always been the ‘wild child’, rearing to get out of Massachusetts and adamant that she wouldn’t be caught dead east of the Mississippi ever again; until she needs her older sister Sally to bail her out. After the death of her husband, Sally left the aunts behind and the little town they called home for a place where she could just fade into the background and raise her daughters; escaping the rumors, whispers and odd looks that met her everywhere she went. It’s Gillian’s unexpected arrival on Sally’s doorstep that stirs things up for everyone.
The major aspects of the storyline that carry over from the book to the movie are Jimmy’s demise, the gorgeous flowers that overtake the Owens’ yard and the appearance of Gary. Aside from that, there is no ‘one blue, one green eye’ incantation (boo!), no midnight margarita time with the aunts (they actually don’t play much of a role in the book) and there is less whimsy in regards to the magic and the curse that surrounds any man who falls in love with an Owens woman. If you remember from the movie, Sally opens a plant based cosmetics shop and neither sister shies away from using her powers or casting spells, which I thought added a fun dynamic to the mix. In this version, it felt like the sisters were always running from who they were and things just sort of happened all around them instead.
Despite the many issues that would typically derail my enjoyment—the complete lack of dialogue throughout much of the story, the non-existent chapters (this book was written in 4 large chunks instead of in a chapter format, which drove me a little mad at times) and the way the author tended to change perspectives mid-page or from one paragraph to the next—I still found myself enjoying my time with this version of the Owens women. There’s no denying this author has a unique way with words.
I’m a little embarrassed to admit it wasn’t until I read my first Alice Hoffman novel last year (The Museum of Extraordinary Things) that I realized Practical Magic was more than just a swoon-worthy movie I’d watched a dozen times over. With numerous viewings under my belt and the upcoming release of the prequel, The Rules of Magic, I figured now was as good of a time as any to dive in and give this a read. I mean how could I not, the book is always better than the movie, right?
Well, maybe not always. In this instance, I wouldn’t say the movie is necessarily better than the book, I'd say I prefer the movie version. Both are great stories, they’re just completely different.
Raised by their aunts and shunned by their classmates for being witches, sisters Gillian and Sally struggled to find their own versions of happiness. Gillian has always been the ‘wild child’, rearing to get out of Massachusetts and adamant that she wouldn’t be caught dead east of the Mississippi ever again; until she needs her older sister Sally to bail her out. After the death of her husband, Sally left the aunts behind and the little town they called home for a place where she could just fade into the background and raise her daughters; escaping the rumors, whispers and odd looks that met her everywhere she went. It’s Gillian’s unexpected arrival on Sally’s doorstep that stirs things up for everyone.
The major aspects of the storyline that carry over from the book to the movie are Jimmy’s demise, the gorgeous flowers that overtake the Owens’ yard and the appearance of Gary. Aside from that, there is no ‘one blue, one green eye’ incantation (boo!), no midnight margarita time with the aunts (they actually don’t play much of a role in the book) and there is less whimsy in regards to the magic and the curse that surrounds any man who falls in love with an Owens woman. If you remember from the movie, Sally opens a plant based cosmetics shop and neither sister shies away from using her powers or casting spells, which I thought added a fun dynamic to the mix. In this version, it felt like the sisters were always running from who they were and things just sort of happened all around them instead.
Despite the many issues that would typically derail my enjoyment—the complete lack of dialogue throughout much of the story, the non-existent chapters (this book was written in 4 large chunks instead of in a chapter format, which drove me a little mad at times) and the way the author tended to change perspectives mid-page or from one paragraph to the next—I still found myself enjoying my time with this version of the Owens women. There’s no denying this author has a unique way with words.
October 26, 2012
This is one of those rare examples of the movie being better than the book. Yeah. I somehow managed to get through it, but this book was like one never-ending series of mood-setting lists. An example:
"Sally thought long and hard each time she hung up the phone. She thought about the girl in the drugstore and the sound of Antonia’s footsteps on the stairs when she went to bed without a good-night hug. She thought about Michael’s life and his death, and about every second they had spent together. She considered each of his kisses and all the words he had ever said to her. Everything was still gray— the paintings Antonia brought home from school and slipped beneath her door, the flannel pajamas Kylie wore on chilly mornings, the velvet curtains that kept the world at bay. But now Sally began to order things in her mind— grief and joy, dollars and cents, a baby’s cry and the look on her face when you blew her a kiss on a windy afternoon. Such things might be worth something, a glance, a peek, a deeper look."
I count 4 lists in just one paragraph. Within the next page, the total of similar lists goes up to 8. In two pages. This kind of writing feels sloppy when it is used beyond the beginning stages of scene setting, and when it is almost the only way the author seems to able to convey meaning it becomes teeth-gnashingly annoying. Add to this a complete lack of momentum and a generally meandering story line and you get a sad face (or maybe bitch face if I’m being honest) and a thumbs down from me.
"Sally thought long and hard each time she hung up the phone. She thought about the girl in the drugstore and the sound of Antonia’s footsteps on the stairs when she went to bed without a good-night hug. She thought about Michael’s life and his death, and about every second they had spent together. She considered each of his kisses and all the words he had ever said to her. Everything was still gray— the paintings Antonia brought home from school and slipped beneath her door, the flannel pajamas Kylie wore on chilly mornings, the velvet curtains that kept the world at bay. But now Sally began to order things in her mind— grief and joy, dollars and cents, a baby’s cry and the look on her face when you blew her a kiss on a windy afternoon. Such things might be worth something, a glance, a peek, a deeper look."
I count 4 lists in just one paragraph. Within the next page, the total of similar lists goes up to 8. In two pages. This kind of writing feels sloppy when it is used beyond the beginning stages of scene setting, and when it is almost the only way the author seems to able to convey meaning it becomes teeth-gnashingly annoying. Add to this a complete lack of momentum and a generally meandering story line and you get a sad face (or maybe bitch face if I’m being honest) and a thumbs down from me.
March 7, 2021
I know it’s reader sacrilege to say this...but, I like the movie better.
October 28, 2022
You put de lime in de coconut...
And that's really the scene that I remember from the movie. Which, I had no idea came from a book back in 1998.
So, I thought I should remedy that during this Halloween season.
I'm going to be honest, I'd heard this sucked in comparison to the movie, and maybe that made me go into it with lower expectations.
But I really liked it. It's different, though, no doubt. But it was different in a way that I enjoyed. In fact, I liked the book better than I did the movie. For me, there was always an indefinable something missing. And I found it in the book.
I love reading about some witchy women who have to deal with life a lot like the rest of us do.
Except for the magic.
Just on the off chance that you don't know the plot, the gist is that two sisters are orphaned and raised by their witchy aunts. Gillian is wild and eventually runs away to party all over the world. And Sally, who has always been the responsible one, gets married and has two daughters of her own. Tragedy strikes them both, and they find out how strong they are and what family actually means to women like themselves who are touched by magic.
Unlike the movie, you not only read about Sally & Gillian but also about Sally's two daughters who are in their teens when the final leg of the story takes place. It's a very realistically magical story if that makes any sort of sense, and I thoroughly loved it.
You know, this was a surprisingly short novel that clocked in at just over 3 hours in audiobook format. If you're afraid of some of these dense fantasyesque stories that have witches in them, but want something a bit spooky around October, this might be your solution.
Edit: Apparently, I've listened to the abridged version. And in my humble opinion, if a book has an abridged version, it probably needed it. Most of the time, less is more.
Recommended. <--the abridged version anyway.
And that's really the scene that I remember from the movie. Which, I had no idea came from a book back in 1998.
So, I thought I should remedy that during this Halloween season.
I'm going to be honest, I'd heard this sucked in comparison to the movie, and maybe that made me go into it with lower expectations.
But I really liked it. It's different, though, no doubt. But it was different in a way that I enjoyed. In fact, I liked the book better than I did the movie. For me, there was always an indefinable something missing. And I found it in the book.
I love reading about some witchy women who have to deal with life a lot like the rest of us do.
Except for the magic.
Just on the off chance that you don't know the plot, the gist is that two sisters are orphaned and raised by their witchy aunts. Gillian is wild and eventually runs away to party all over the world. And Sally, who has always been the responsible one, gets married and has two daughters of her own. Tragedy strikes them both, and they find out how strong they are and what family actually means to women like themselves who are touched by magic.
Unlike the movie, you not only read about Sally & Gillian but also about Sally's two daughters who are in their teens when the final leg of the story takes place. It's a very realistically magical story if that makes any sort of sense, and I thoroughly loved it.
You know, this was a surprisingly short novel that clocked in at just over 3 hours in audiobook format. If you're afraid of some of these dense fantasyesque stories that have witches in them, but want something a bit spooky around October, this might be your solution.
Edit: Apparently, I've listened to the abridged version. And in my humble opinion, if a book has an abridged version, it probably needed it. Most of the time, less is more.
Recommended. <--the abridged version anyway.
October 16, 2017
I absolutely adored this. Practical Magic is just that: MAGIC!
I was so captivated, I was able to read it in a weekend. The writing is beautiful.
Hoffman has such a pleasing style; just gorgeous. This was the first novel that I have read of hers and it definitely will not be the last.
It is quite different from the movie version, but stands strong in its own right.
I did picture Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman in my head the whole time though. In short, if you haven't read this, you should!
I was so captivated, I was able to read it in a weekend. The writing is beautiful.
Hoffman has such a pleasing style; just gorgeous. This was the first novel that I have read of hers and it definitely will not be the last.
It is quite different from the movie version, but stands strong in its own right.
I did picture Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman in my head the whole time though. In short, if you haven't read this, you should!
January 26, 2018
Rereading with my Retro Chapter Chicks as we eagerly await Magic Lessons!!
During the last few months of last year I had been eagerly awaiting Alice Hoffman's new book Rules of Magic. I had read new books by some of my go to authors for magical realism, which had left a bitter taste in my mouth because these books were contemporary and devoid of magical occurrences. Rules of Magic, while not necessarily magical realism, was simply magical. As soon as I finished reading the tale of Frances and Jet Owens, I reserved the story where it all began, Practical Magic. Much to my dismay, many people had the same idea, and I had to wait another two months to read Hoffman's first installment of the Owens family. Finally getting my hands on this magical family saga, I was as enthralled as I had been with the new prequel.
Sally and Gillian Owens grew up in the rural Massachusetts home of their elderly great aunts Frannie and Jet Owens. In this Magnolia Street home that I got to know so well in Rules of Magic, Frannie continued the family business of assisting women in concocting various forms of love potions. Although it was well known that the Owens family had been witches for the past three hundred years, women in desperate situations still turned to Frannie and Jet in times of need. The aunts also brewed black soap twice a year and tended to their garden where supernatural events happened over time. Raising Sally and Gillian devoid of normal parental rules, the girls were allowed to stay up until midnight on a regular basis, eat candy bars for supper, and, adhering to the family tradition, wear black wool coats to school even in the heat of summer.
The entire town realized that Sally and Gillian were different and ridiculed them on a daily basis, only to have the aunts come to their rescue. An entire classroom teased Gillian; no problem; the aunts would come to school for a classroom party and the other children would find themselves tongue tied. The girls grew up as close as sisters, yet were literally as different as night and day. Gillian continued the Owens tradition of blond hair and of making every man who came in her path lovesick. She broke many hearts, married three times as a result of these supernatural occurrences, and moved as far away from the aunts as she could in an attempt to prevent magic from happening. Meanwhile, Sally maintained the Owens line of a head of long black hair, living practically as alluded to in the title, and moving the family forward to the next generation as she became the mother to two girls, as different as night and day, Antonia and Kylie. Sally also desired a normal life for her children so she, too, moved away from the safety of the aunts to a suburban Long Island community. There she became a respected member of her neighborhood, and, more importantly, no one knew of the family history of witch craft.
As much as things changed, they also stayed the same. Gillian continued to break hearts, and Sally lived a practical life. Neither embraced their heritage yet noted the supernatural events that would take place near them like familiars entering their home, lilac bushes blooming out of season, and the appearance of portends on the longest night of the year. The magic continued with Antonia, although she did not know it, as boys and men had their blood boil or turn to ice water the second she entered the room. Both girls attempted a normal life, yet, when their aunt Gillian reentered their lives during their teenaged years, the girls' lives were anything but normal. While Sally and Gillian desired a life devoid of magic, as they moved toward middle age, witchcraft seemed to find them and the rest of their family. As a result, the entire plot of Practical Magic is full of the same magical prose that I grew to love in Rules of Magic.
While the aunts in Rules of Magic do not play as large of a role in Practical Magic as I would have liked, they exposed Sally and Gillian to the family traditions as girls so that they would turn to magic in times of need as adults. Although each successive generation becomes less magical than the last, the Owens family continue to embrace their place as witches in the context of society at large, giving others the opportunity to laud rather than ridicule them. Both Kylie and Antonia stand out as different in appearance yet are popular members of their school where no one realizes that they are witches. The girls; however, love the time spent in the presence of their elderly, spinster aunts and will be able to continue the family traditions to the next generation when their time comes. Whether it comes in the form of concocting black soap or acquiring a pet toad, the Owens magical line appears to be safe as Antonia and Kylie Owens come of age.
Magical realism continues to be my preferred reading genre. I enjoy the Latin American branch of the genre most as these occurrences seem to flow from the culture. In the three books of Hoffman's that I have read, I have been wowed by her ability to produce magical realism in a North American culture. Practical Magic introduced readers to the Owens family, setting the stage for the equally if not more magical Rules of Magic years later. With the prose ending with the Owens trademark rules to live by, the door is open for yet another story featuring Antonia and Kylie Owens down the road. If this is indeed the case, I would run to read this installment as well as I have found my time spent with the Owens family in any generation to be simply magical.
✨ 4 + ⚡️🧙♀️🌚 magical stars ✨
During the last few months of last year I had been eagerly awaiting Alice Hoffman's new book Rules of Magic. I had read new books by some of my go to authors for magical realism, which had left a bitter taste in my mouth because these books were contemporary and devoid of magical occurrences. Rules of Magic, while not necessarily magical realism, was simply magical. As soon as I finished reading the tale of Frances and Jet Owens, I reserved the story where it all began, Practical Magic. Much to my dismay, many people had the same idea, and I had to wait another two months to read Hoffman's first installment of the Owens family. Finally getting my hands on this magical family saga, I was as enthralled as I had been with the new prequel.
Sally and Gillian Owens grew up in the rural Massachusetts home of their elderly great aunts Frannie and Jet Owens. In this Magnolia Street home that I got to know so well in Rules of Magic, Frannie continued the family business of assisting women in concocting various forms of love potions. Although it was well known that the Owens family had been witches for the past three hundred years, women in desperate situations still turned to Frannie and Jet in times of need. The aunts also brewed black soap twice a year and tended to their garden where supernatural events happened over time. Raising Sally and Gillian devoid of normal parental rules, the girls were allowed to stay up until midnight on a regular basis, eat candy bars for supper, and, adhering to the family tradition, wear black wool coats to school even in the heat of summer.
The entire town realized that Sally and Gillian were different and ridiculed them on a daily basis, only to have the aunts come to their rescue. An entire classroom teased Gillian; no problem; the aunts would come to school for a classroom party and the other children would find themselves tongue tied. The girls grew up as close as sisters, yet were literally as different as night and day. Gillian continued the Owens tradition of blond hair and of making every man who came in her path lovesick. She broke many hearts, married three times as a result of these supernatural occurrences, and moved as far away from the aunts as she could in an attempt to prevent magic from happening. Meanwhile, Sally maintained the Owens line of a head of long black hair, living practically as alluded to in the title, and moving the family forward to the next generation as she became the mother to two girls, as different as night and day, Antonia and Kylie. Sally also desired a normal life for her children so she, too, moved away from the safety of the aunts to a suburban Long Island community. There she became a respected member of her neighborhood, and, more importantly, no one knew of the family history of witch craft.
As much as things changed, they also stayed the same. Gillian continued to break hearts, and Sally lived a practical life. Neither embraced their heritage yet noted the supernatural events that would take place near them like familiars entering their home, lilac bushes blooming out of season, and the appearance of portends on the longest night of the year. The magic continued with Antonia, although she did not know it, as boys and men had their blood boil or turn to ice water the second she entered the room. Both girls attempted a normal life, yet, when their aunt Gillian reentered their lives during their teenaged years, the girls' lives were anything but normal. While Sally and Gillian desired a life devoid of magic, as they moved toward middle age, witchcraft seemed to find them and the rest of their family. As a result, the entire plot of Practical Magic is full of the same magical prose that I grew to love in Rules of Magic.
While the aunts in Rules of Magic do not play as large of a role in Practical Magic as I would have liked, they exposed Sally and Gillian to the family traditions as girls so that they would turn to magic in times of need as adults. Although each successive generation becomes less magical than the last, the Owens family continue to embrace their place as witches in the context of society at large, giving others the opportunity to laud rather than ridicule them. Both Kylie and Antonia stand out as different in appearance yet are popular members of their school where no one realizes that they are witches. The girls; however, love the time spent in the presence of their elderly, spinster aunts and will be able to continue the family traditions to the next generation when their time comes. Whether it comes in the form of concocting black soap or acquiring a pet toad, the Owens magical line appears to be safe as Antonia and Kylie Owens come of age.
Magical realism continues to be my preferred reading genre. I enjoy the Latin American branch of the genre most as these occurrences seem to flow from the culture. In the three books of Hoffman's that I have read, I have been wowed by her ability to produce magical realism in a North American culture. Practical Magic introduced readers to the Owens family, setting the stage for the equally if not more magical Rules of Magic years later. With the prose ending with the Owens trademark rules to live by, the door is open for yet another story featuring Antonia and Kylie Owens down the road. If this is indeed the case, I would run to read this installment as well as I have found my time spent with the Owens family in any generation to be simply magical.
✨ 4 + ⚡️🧙♀️🌚 magical stars ✨
July 24, 2017
This one is a hard one to review. I think most know the movie Practical Magic. I love this movie as I'm sure that most do. Everytime it's on, I watch it. Does not matter at what time I catch it, I watch till the end and swoon. When I started watching the movie, initially, I had no idea it was based on a book. So for years now I've been wanting to read this one. But then I see the movie is on and watch it. But the prequel is coming out and I have a copy and figured it's time I read it.
Let me just say...the book *is nothing* like the movie, or the movie *is nothing* like the book. Comparing the two is comparing apples to pumpkins. They have the same characters, Jimmy has the same fate, and that's about it. Well, they both had margaritas too, but in two totally different context. So to focus on the book, it tells the story of the Owens sisters. Gillian is a free spirit, moving around from place to place, and guy to guy. Sally is more settled and rigid (uptight), having two children. Gillian and Sally lived for many years with their aunts, who play very minor roles in this book. I think the story is more about sisters. The bond between Gillian and Sally, how much they fight but also how they can depend on one another . The same about Sally's two girls, you hear a lot more about their lives, their fighting, and what brings them together. I don't really consider any of them witches, they have strong intuitions that they act upon. The initial story of the aunts was a bit more detailed with local women coming to them for help in love, but I still did not think them witches.
I did enjoy this one and I'm glad I finally got to it. It's a good character study of the bonds of sisters and the stories of love. Do not go into this one with the movie version is mind, again, they are sooooo completely different. They must be thought of two different things. I really wanted the audio so I searched and found it on Hoopla (tip, make sure to get the 9 hr version, not the condensed 3 hr version - really, they trimmed it that much). The narration was just OK for me. Maybe I could not separate the movie from my head and the voices the narrator used just did not match, or work for me. I could have had the print or audio in this case. I am so looking forward to getting into the prequel and hearing so much more about the aunts.
One funny thing I must say....I tend to listen to most audios while I'm in the kitchen making dinner. There was about a page or two of some *very* risque talk about Gillian and her new man. I actually was a bit shocked as I didn't expect it. Naturally, it was at that very moment my husband came into the kitchen and said 'what in the H*LL are you listening to????' Ha! So an FYI if you listen in public or around children or others. :-)
Let me just say...the book *is nothing* like the movie, or the movie *is nothing* like the book. Comparing the two is comparing apples to pumpkins. They have the same characters, Jimmy has the same fate, and that's about it. Well, they both had margaritas too, but in two totally different context. So to focus on the book, it tells the story of the Owens sisters. Gillian is a free spirit, moving around from place to place, and guy to guy. Sally is more settled and rigid (uptight), having two children. Gillian and Sally lived for many years with their aunts, who play very minor roles in this book. I think the story is more about sisters. The bond between Gillian and Sally, how much they fight but also how they can depend on one another . The same about Sally's two girls, you hear a lot more about their lives, their fighting, and what brings them together. I don't really consider any of them witches, they have strong intuitions that they act upon. The initial story of the aunts was a bit more detailed with local women coming to them for help in love, but I still did not think them witches.
I did enjoy this one and I'm glad I finally got to it. It's a good character study of the bonds of sisters and the stories of love. Do not go into this one with the movie version is mind, again, they are sooooo completely different. They must be thought of two different things. I really wanted the audio so I searched and found it on Hoopla (tip, make sure to get the 9 hr version, not the condensed 3 hr version - really, they trimmed it that much). The narration was just OK for me. Maybe I could not separate the movie from my head and the voices the narrator used just did not match, or work for me. I could have had the print or audio in this case. I am so looking forward to getting into the prequel and hearing so much more about the aunts.
One funny thing I must say....I tend to listen to most audios while I'm in the kitchen making dinner. There was about a page or two of some *very* risque talk about Gillian and her new man. I actually was a bit shocked as I didn't expect it. Naturally, it was at that very moment my husband came into the kitchen and said 'what in the H*LL are you listening to????' Ha! So an FYI if you listen in public or around children or others. :-)
October 9, 2019
I love the movie and... it's unfortunately better than the book.
The vibes are still nice but the writing wasn't my favourite and some parts didn't age as well.
I'd recommend checking out Garden Spells by Sarah Addison Allen for something similar/better!
The vibes are still nice but the writing wasn't my favourite and some parts didn't age as well.
I'd recommend checking out Garden Spells by Sarah Addison Allen for something similar/better!
December 28, 2017
The first clue that this was going to be a slog was the two audio versions. Unabridged, the running time is 9 hours 12 minutes. The abridged version is a mere 3 hours 6 minutes. As a general rule, if you can cut 70% of your book and it’s still coherent, that’s not a good sign.
Unfortunately the purist in me had to listen to the unabridged version. Now that it’s over, I can confirm that 70% could easily be cut. Probably more.
That’s not to say the entire experience was terrible. Hoffman is clearly a talented writer. If I did have to pinpoint where it went wrong, I’d say the confusing POV changes had a part in it. There was a general passiveness in the storytelling. There aren’t a lot of “scenes” but there is a ton of summary. Consequently I got the vague sense of characters but could never really connect with them without concrete moments. The magic of love is a reoccurring theme, but supernatural or not, the threads of love connections felt forced and unbelievable. Obviously there was a lot of filler.
I’ve never seen the movie, but I’m sure it’s better than the book. Actually, I did see the 2 minute trailer and even that snippet was better. In the end, with so many books and so little time, I wish I had skipped this one.
Unfortunately the purist in me had to listen to the unabridged version. Now that it’s over, I can confirm that 70% could easily be cut. Probably more.
That’s not to say the entire experience was terrible. Hoffman is clearly a talented writer. If I did have to pinpoint where it went wrong, I’d say the confusing POV changes had a part in it. There was a general passiveness in the storytelling. There aren’t a lot of “scenes” but there is a ton of summary. Consequently I got the vague sense of characters but could never really connect with them without concrete moments. The magic of love is a reoccurring theme, but supernatural or not, the threads of love connections felt forced and unbelievable. Obviously there was a lot of filler.
I’ve never seen the movie, but I’m sure it’s better than the book. Actually, I did see the 2 minute trailer and even that snippet was better. In the end, with so many books and so little time, I wish I had skipped this one.
October 22, 2017
I guess I have changed.
I have my little paperback copy I got and read years ago. And of course I found it after I bought the one with the cool boot on the front 🙄
Anyway, I loved the book so much back then and now it's just meh! I still love the movie but something just didn't get me as pulled in as before. Oh well. It's still good.
Mel ❤️
I have my little paperback copy I got and read years ago. And of course I found it after I bought the one with the cool boot on the front 🙄
Anyway, I loved the book so much back then and now it's just meh! I still love the movie but something just didn't get me as pulled in as before. Oh well. It's still good.
Mel ❤️
September 5, 2020
“always throw spilled salt over your left shoulder. keep rosemary by your garden gate. add pepper to your mashed potatoes. plant roses and lavender, for luck. fall in love whenever you can.”
in this story, the troubled lives of two generations of owens women are at the forefront. there’s sally and gillian, two sisters who couldn’t be more different, trying to find their place in the world. almost two decades later, the same occurs for sally’s teenage daughters, antonia and kylie.
it’s a slice-of-life, coming of age kind of story: we accompany sally and gillian from early childhood to somewhere in their late thirties, watching them struggle through high school bullying, lovesick boys, and the town’s superstitious prejudices against their family.
one being the goody-two-shoes and the other being the wild child, they eventually drift away from each other and their hometown. but then gillian is forced to ask her sister sally -- now widowed and with two teenage daughters -- for help once she’s landed herself in Truly Hot Water.
part life lessons, part bad decisions and dead bodies, this book should’ve been everything i usually love -- but instead it just gave me an annoyingly meandering, padded experience that ultimately led to nowhere.
… i’m also just going to come out and say it: i think the movie is better than the book.
even though the movie is campy and corny at times and also vastly dissimilar from the book, as i now know, it’s still leagues better in terms of themes, portrayal of relationships, and even in its supernatural aspects.
watching the movie before reading the book led me to expect certain things of the story thematically, too. where the movie focuses on relationships between women across generations being a huge healing factor for childhood trauma, fear, prejudice, and standing one’s ground against toxic and abusive men, the book seems to vaguely focus on… love as its main theme?
i remain somewhat doubtful because ‘love’ as a concept is very strangely and inconsistently portrayed within the story. it seems very much tied into romantic love all the time, up to the point where the owens sisters are almost exclusively having fallout or getting angry with each other over each other’s beauty and how that influences the world around them.
... which is such an old, tired trope. i mean, come on.
all owens women are apparently supernaturally beautiful: when wearing a short skirt, gillian LITERALLY causes traffic accidents. once she starts working at the burger joint, rows of drooling teenage boys show up constantly ordering junk food just for a chance at being close to her (a thirty-something woman). and when the biology teacher sets his eyes on her, all other women in town get mad ‘cause they were gunning for him to notice them.
likewise, antonia is constantly turning heads in high school. every boy wants to date her. meanwhile, kylie is left in the dust as an awkward, too-tall, frizzy-haired weirdo who’s always jealous her sister’s getting all the attention. until she grows up and magically gets hot (in 90s teen flick makeover style) and starts outshining her older sister.
stuff like this seems the only source of discord between both sally and gillian, and kylie and antonia (and the other women in town) -- with sally and kylie taking on the role of the ugly, practical sister always looking to do The Right Thing and being ‘weird’ or different, and gillian and antonia taking on the role of the beautiful, vapid sister always focusing on The Boys instead.
speaking of which... boy oh boy are there a lot of Boys in this novel.
i doubt there’s a single man in this who’s not at one point served as a love interest for any of the owens women. and owens girls. because yes, even the thirteen-year-old who’s suddenly gotten hotter than her sixteen-year-old sister gets a love interest.
here, too, ‘love’ does not seem to be the right word for whatever’s happening. if practical magic was the source of all insta-love in the lit world, i’d believe it. no joke. everyone seems almost drunkenly obsessed with each other within a SECOND of meeting each other, up to the point where i had to awkwardly read characters fantasizing about fucking each other two paragraphs after meeting.
NONE of the romantic relationships that develop in this book seem to be healthy. i absolutely do not say this in a slut-shaming or prudish way, nor do i believe there’s only one way of falling in love but jesus christ. people pondering to sink to their knees on someone’s porch in the pouring rain, proclaiming their love, and asking them to marry them after being on a few dates.
or how about this gem? context: they’ve met TWICE, he’s investigating her possible involvement in a murder, she gives him a half-confession to said murder, and he starts crying because he desires her SO MUCH. she half-climbs in his lap after chiding him for crying, and after some canoodling we get this (warning for rapey thoughts incoming):
“at this moment, gary wishes he could grab her and force her, at least until she gave in. he’d like to make love to her right there, he’d like to do it all night and not give a damn about anything else, and not listen if she told him no. but he’s not that kind of man, and he never will be. he’s seen too many lives go wrong when a man allows himself to be led around by his dick.”
… YIKES. i honestly don’t even want to try unpacking all of that.
it all just felt so strangely jarring to me, especially considering how a lot of gillian’s story revolves around her escaping an abusive relationship involving physical violence and rape. but even that is easily shoved to the sidelines in favor of mr. deeply obsessed rope wrangling biology teacher stalking her until she gives into loving him.
which is all good because she trusts him enough to let him tie her up, no worries!
hoffman seems to flirt very much with the idea of the witch being a female archetype that embodies feminist values, and is therefore shunned and othered: independent, powerful, self-reliant and headstrong. we see this in stories about various owens women in the family line, being bullied for being different as well as in charge of their own destiny. they even have a tradition of children born of their line always taking on the owens surname.
but everything else in this book just seems to undermine that very message or concept, focusing instead on an unhealthy obsession with romantic love and how ‘growing up’ for women means they either start looking like a supermodel or they… start dressing down to hide their beauty because they don’t want to utilize it, i guess??
it could have been a poignant commentary on sexism, the importance of interpersonal relationships, and the worth and agency of women beyond how society objectifies them -- and the occasional off-handed comment does reach that level -- while showcasing the life of a couple of very flawed characters… but alas, ‘tis not meant to be. [1]
the prose is about the only thing that holds up very well. hoffman has a way with the english language that evokes a kind of magic all on its own, and her descriptions of the witchy mansion sally and gillian grow up in are lovely to read. some of the life lessons in this are wrapped up in an absolute exquisite way, too.
but in terms of story execution… too much padding / filler, too much recounting and not showing, and constant meandering in and out of flashbacks and various points of views. seriously, it got to the point where some parts of the narrative just became a mushy fever dream while i was reading it.
at the end of the day, this book was simply not it. i find myself longing for the heartfelt characters and relationships i remember from the film, so that’s what i’ll be rewatching again tonight.
✎ 2.0 stars.
[1] is the movie super clever metaphorical commentary on sexism? i don’t know. but it DOES do every single one of those things hoffman seems to be only alluding to in her book: employing the archetype of the witch and breaking it down to show how a community of women can empower & strengthen each other while driving out abusers.
August 30, 2020
I read The Rules of Magic a few years ago without having read this one which was written before it. I was recently thinking about Alice Hoffman’s new novel Magic Lessons to be published in October, 2020, and I decided that I should read this one before I get to the advanced copy that I am fortunate enough to have. I discovered that it didn’t really matter when in time I was reading about the Owens family because I loved them all the same, no matter which generation. I needed a little of Alice Hoffman’s magic, both the magic in the story and the magic of her writing. I was drawn to the Aunts and to Gillian and Sally, their two young nieces that they take in when they become orphaned and later to Sally’s daughters. As odd as this family is and as eerie as the story can feel at times, it’s delightful and full of heart and love, and of course, magic - just what I needed right now. Hoffman is such a prolific and versatile writer and I’ve read several others . I’m glad I have many more of her books yet to read .
September 21, 2026
2.5
Unfortunately, this I think is one of those rare cases where the movie is actually better than the book...
First of all, the movie feels a lot more whimsical & romantic. The book definitely feels more contemporary fiction which is fine... and maybe my expectations going in were skewed based on having watched the movie first - but I just really loved watching the dynamic between the sisters, family & women onscreen, that's truly what shone in the story for me... and we don't get the same feeling in the book. Funny thing is, I was actually hoping the book would give me more depth on the main romance line because in the movie - it's very much just portrayed as a *magically instant connection that was fated to happen*, and felt very random to me - but unfortunately it somehow felt even more random and had even less depth in the book?
I also didn't love the writing style. The book is written in this shifting third person omniscient style that feels very detached because it's constantly floating between character perspectives (and I mean truly floating from sentence to sentence). Which again, can work when done well - especially in fairytale feeling stories, or generational stories where we're following a larger cast. Fredrik Backman for example does this incredibly well in the Beartown series. But it's tricky because you need to be super intentional with which characters' thoughts you choose to share and which you don't, and the way things were presented to us here just felt very scattered overall. I found myself unable to fully connect to or like any of the characters because they would act out rashly several times throughout the book, and have a lot of these "ugly" thoughts about others around them- but because we didn't really commit to getting deep into any of the characters' minds, I couldn't get myself to feel for them even in these emotional moments.
The overall story has potential (and you can see it in the movie), but sadly the book didn't do it for me!
Unfortunately, this I think is one of those rare cases where the movie is actually better than the book...
First of all, the movie feels a lot more whimsical & romantic. The book definitely feels more contemporary fiction which is fine... and maybe my expectations going in were skewed based on having watched the movie first - but I just really loved watching the dynamic between the sisters, family & women onscreen, that's truly what shone in the story for me... and we don't get the same feeling in the book. Funny thing is, I was actually hoping the book would give me more depth on the main romance line because in the movie - it's very much just portrayed as a *magically instant connection that was fated to happen*, and felt very random to me - but unfortunately it somehow felt even more random and had even less depth in the book?
I also didn't love the writing style. The book is written in this shifting third person omniscient style that feels very detached because it's constantly floating between character perspectives (and I mean truly floating from sentence to sentence). Which again, can work when done well - especially in fairytale feeling stories, or generational stories where we're following a larger cast. Fredrik Backman for example does this incredibly well in the Beartown series. But it's tricky because you need to be super intentional with which characters' thoughts you choose to share and which you don't, and the way things were presented to us here just felt very scattered overall. I found myself unable to fully connect to or like any of the characters because they would act out rashly several times throughout the book, and have a lot of these "ugly" thoughts about others around them- but because we didn't really commit to getting deep into any of the characters' minds, I couldn't get myself to feel for them even in these emotional moments.
The overall story has potential (and you can see it in the movie), but sadly the book didn't do it for me!
February 18, 2012
This is the first time in my reading life that I can say that the movie is better than the book. I honestly wish that I'd read the book first, because the monumental let down of reading the book after the movie has been something I cannot reconcile. The movie is beautiful, the storyline is engaging and witty, and the characters draw you in and make you laugh and cry. Yet the book is so far removed from the movie, they are hardly relatable at all, with such flimsy linkages, you could actually see them as two completely different stories.
The books is slow, very American, with a somewhat annoying narration. I did not love any of the main characters, and for a book that makes a vague attempt at being supernatural, many of the 'magical' things that happened in the book were less believable because it did not step strongly enough into the supernatural theme. It was like any other suburban novel, with a few sparkly tweaks.
I've never been so disappointed in a novel. I was looking forward to really knowing the Aunts, to feel myself in that old house, but it wasn't too be. I felt like I was reading just some book, not the original premise of my favourite movie.
I'm completely bummed.
The books is slow, very American, with a somewhat annoying narration. I did not love any of the main characters, and for a book that makes a vague attempt at being supernatural, many of the 'magical' things that happened in the book were less believable because it did not step strongly enough into the supernatural theme. It was like any other suburban novel, with a few sparkly tweaks.
I've never been so disappointed in a novel. I was looking forward to really knowing the Aunts, to feel myself in that old house, but it wasn't too be. I felt like I was reading just some book, not the original premise of my favourite movie.
I'm completely bummed.
July 31, 2023
I thought I had already posted my review of this book, since I read it a while ago, as I was catching up after reading The Rules of Magic which is the prequel to this book. Review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I absolutely loved the 1998 movie with Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman. If you haven’t seen it, I would recommend watching it – or if you have seen it, watch it again. I think it has risen to classic status.
By now, you probably know that the author has now also written, Magic Lessons, which is the prequel to The Rules of Magic. Review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Your best bet is to read in the following order: Magic Lessons, Practical Magic and then the Rules of Magic. Even though they weren’t written that way, it does probably flow better that way now.
On to the review:
The Owens sisters confront the challenges of life and love, but not exactly in a normal way. You see, for more than 200 years, the Owens women have been blamed for everything that has gone wrong in their Massachusetts town. Gillian and Sally, as children were forever outsiders, taunted and talked about. Their elderly aunts encouraged the whispers of witchery. Of course, it didn’t help that they lived in a musty house and enjoyed exotic concoctions and a crowd of black cats.
Even though Gillian and Sally may want to get out, as adults they still return.
The plot moved slowly, but it was still entertaining. The magic was enticing – but I wanted more.
I couldn’t help but find myself comparing the book to the movie, since I saw the movie first and kept visualizing Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman in the parts. And of course, Stockard Channing and Dianne Wiest were brilliant as the aunts in the movie, so they were easy to see in my mind, as I read the book, as well.
So, which did I like better, the book or the movie? The movie.
But the book had its enjoyable moments.
Still… Beware, there are trigger warnings here, too…
Domestic abuse, grief, emotional abuse, death, bullying and sexual violence.
I absolutely loved the 1998 movie with Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman. If you haven’t seen it, I would recommend watching it – or if you have seen it, watch it again. I think it has risen to classic status.
By now, you probably know that the author has now also written, Magic Lessons, which is the prequel to The Rules of Magic. Review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Your best bet is to read in the following order: Magic Lessons, Practical Magic and then the Rules of Magic. Even though they weren’t written that way, it does probably flow better that way now.
On to the review:
The Owens sisters confront the challenges of life and love, but not exactly in a normal way. You see, for more than 200 years, the Owens women have been blamed for everything that has gone wrong in their Massachusetts town. Gillian and Sally, as children were forever outsiders, taunted and talked about. Their elderly aunts encouraged the whispers of witchery. Of course, it didn’t help that they lived in a musty house and enjoyed exotic concoctions and a crowd of black cats.
Even though Gillian and Sally may want to get out, as adults they still return.
The plot moved slowly, but it was still entertaining. The magic was enticing – but I wanted more.
I couldn’t help but find myself comparing the book to the movie, since I saw the movie first and kept visualizing Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman in the parts. And of course, Stockard Channing and Dianne Wiest were brilliant as the aunts in the movie, so they were easy to see in my mind, as I read the book, as well.
So, which did I like better, the book or the movie? The movie.
But the book had its enjoyable moments.
Still… Beware, there are trigger warnings here, too…
Domestic abuse, grief, emotional abuse, death, bullying and sexual violence.
August 13, 2017
“The lesson Sally had learned so long ago in the kitchen—to be careful what you wish for—was so far and so faded it had turned to yellow dust. But it was the sort of dust that can never be swept up, and instead waits in the corner and blows into the eyes of those you love when a draft moves through your house.”
It’s only recently that I left Hoffman’s world in ”The Rules of Magic,” and so I returned to that world of the Owens family, to pick up where I’d left off, with a return to the home of the aunts in Massachusetts, in “Practical Magic” . Of course, I’ve seen the movie at least a dozen times over the years, which played somewhat of a factor. It’s hard to disassociate yourself from all the lines, the actors, the scenes you remember so well from the movie, and impossible to forget certain scenes. So, I’ll just say that I felt this was very different from the movie.
Gillian and Sally are sisters, grown now, Sally has two daughters of her own, is sensitive, compassionate and has succeeded in building a life for herself, them, removed from the aunts, removed from magic and all the stares and the softly murmured gossip, the condemnation that followed them like a shadow. Gillian is reckless and wild, impulsive and unlucky in love. Extremely unlucky this latest time, and so she heads to the only place she can think of, home, and since she is leaving her latest abode, she heads to Sally’s home, dragging her past with her.
Having read this after reading “The Rules of Magic” , I felt her growth as an author in her latest, or perhaps I just preferred it, overall. This is definitely worth reading, but even going into it determined to avoid comparisons to Hollywood’s “enhancements” on her novel (almost impossible), I still found myself comparing it to “The Rules of Magic” .
What I did love in “Practical Magic” was the sense of magic being everywhere, which added a lovely touch, a reminder of how life itself is a magical experience. The references to those everyday magical moments, infused with just a pinch more “practical” magic to transport you away.
“Always keep mint on your windowsill in August, to ensure that buzzing flies will stay outside, where they belong. Don’t think the summer is over, even when roses droop and turn brown and the stars shift position in the sky. Never presume August is a safe or reliable time of the year. It is the seas on reversals, when the birds no longer sing in the morning and the evenings are made up of equal parts golden light and black clouds. The rock-solid and the tenuous can easily exchange places until everything you know can be questioned and put into doubt.”
It’s only recently that I left Hoffman’s world in ”The Rules of Magic,” and so I returned to that world of the Owens family, to pick up where I’d left off, with a return to the home of the aunts in Massachusetts, in “Practical Magic” . Of course, I’ve seen the movie at least a dozen times over the years, which played somewhat of a factor. It’s hard to disassociate yourself from all the lines, the actors, the scenes you remember so well from the movie, and impossible to forget certain scenes. So, I’ll just say that I felt this was very different from the movie.
Gillian and Sally are sisters, grown now, Sally has two daughters of her own, is sensitive, compassionate and has succeeded in building a life for herself, them, removed from the aunts, removed from magic and all the stares and the softly murmured gossip, the condemnation that followed them like a shadow. Gillian is reckless and wild, impulsive and unlucky in love. Extremely unlucky this latest time, and so she heads to the only place she can think of, home, and since she is leaving her latest abode, she heads to Sally’s home, dragging her past with her.
Having read this after reading “The Rules of Magic” , I felt her growth as an author in her latest, or perhaps I just preferred it, overall. This is definitely worth reading, but even going into it determined to avoid comparisons to Hollywood’s “enhancements” on her novel (almost impossible), I still found myself comparing it to “The Rules of Magic” .
What I did love in “Practical Magic” was the sense of magic being everywhere, which added a lovely touch, a reminder of how life itself is a magical experience. The references to those everyday magical moments, infused with just a pinch more “practical” magic to transport you away.
“Always keep mint on your windowsill in August, to ensure that buzzing flies will stay outside, where they belong. Don’t think the summer is over, even when roses droop and turn brown and the stars shift position in the sky. Never presume August is a safe or reliable time of the year. It is the seas on reversals, when the birds no longer sing in the morning and the evenings are made up of equal parts golden light and black clouds. The rock-solid and the tenuous can easily exchange places until everything you know can be questioned and put into doubt.”
September 29, 2017
My fear about this was I wouldn’t get on with the magical realism element. However that wasn’t a problem. The problem was more my feeling that it lacked a raison d’etre. For a long time it felt like a story was continually being set up but never quite happening. I’ve never seen the film but have a hunch it might be better than the novel because there’s a lot of padding in the book, lots of asides. Essentially a light and fun read, intelligent chick lit (every male character in this book is a lover) with some good observations about female relationships, insecurities and loneliness but I was in the mood for something of more substance and this didn’t quite hit the spot.
May 30, 2023
Relectura 2025: Me reafirmo en el amor que siento por esta novela, sus personajes y la manera de narrar de la autora. Para mi 100/10, pero claro, es un libro no apto para todo el mundo.
*************************************
Vaya por dios que ME HE ENAMORADO y no lo tenía previsto.
Y eso que este libro tiene demasiado de eso: romances apasionados y totalmente locos (e incluso algún terrible instalove), lo único que no he disfrutado tanto... pero bueno, en esta novela precisamente eso tiene todo el sentido xD
Practical Magic cuenta la historia de varias generaciones de hermanas (brujas) que viven en un pueblecillo, tratan el mal de amores y cuidan del jardín. Es un cuento de hadas y es totalmente realista al mismo tiempo. Auténtico realismo mágico de la nueva escuela y plenamente asentado en los años 90 en que se escribió.
Me ha enamorado cómo está narrando, deteniéndose en los personajes principales y secundarios, creando una atmósfera envolvente y totalmente mágica pero al mismo tiempo muy cotidiana.
También hay violencia de género, espíritus malignos, asesinato y muchas peleas de hermanas.
*************************************
Vaya por dios que ME HE ENAMORADO y no lo tenía previsto.
Y eso que este libro tiene demasiado de eso: romances apasionados y totalmente locos (e incluso algún terrible instalove), lo único que no he disfrutado tanto... pero bueno, en esta novela precisamente eso tiene todo el sentido xD
Practical Magic cuenta la historia de varias generaciones de hermanas (brujas) que viven en un pueblecillo, tratan el mal de amores y cuidan del jardín. Es un cuento de hadas y es totalmente realista al mismo tiempo. Auténtico realismo mágico de la nueva escuela y plenamente asentado en los años 90 en que se escribió.
Me ha enamorado cómo está narrando, deteniéndose en los personajes principales y secundarios, creando una atmósfera envolvente y totalmente mágica pero al mismo tiempo muy cotidiana.
También hay violencia de género, espíritus malignos, asesinato y muchas peleas de hermanas.
October 20, 2023
Practical Magic by Alice Hoffman is the First Book Written in the Practical Magic Series!
I've been itching to test the water's of Alice Hoffman's writing and with the Practical Magic Series being synonymous with this author's name, it seems like the perfect place to begin.
If you're thinking about reading this series, there are two options to consider before you begin. Do you read the books in the order written? OR in chronological order?
My choice was to begin where Alice Hoffman began writing...
Practical Magic is the story of Owens sisters Sally and Gillian who grew up in Massachusetts with their two elderly aunts. As children, they were viewed as outcasts, ridiculed, and treated like oddities to avoid and blame for anything awry in their small town. Although they look and act entirely different from one another, they share a dream of one day escaping to a place where no one knows who they are.
To tell you anything more would spoil your experience of reading Practical Magic...
I will tell you that Hoffman's writing style is, shall we say, unique. She packs a ton of information about the story and characters into one thought after another, in a rambling fashion that at first feels overwhelming, then addictive, and strangely enough, it all works. All the pieces and parts connect and flow together seamlessly. It's magical!
The characters are all a delightful surprise and even the most unlikable ones are interesting and creatively drawn. There are abundant deep emotions that swirl around the Owens sisters, sometimes it gets a little darker than expected, but the magic within the story is what's most memorable.
One small issue I experienced was the design of the book with four overly long sections that were between 56 - 95 pages. I enjoy a read with short chapters or, in this case, frequent section breaks that make a book feel like a faster read. It's a personal preference but I do know I'm not alone in this opinion.
Practical Magic was the perfect read to begin my October reading month and I enjoyed the heck out of it from beginning to end. I highly recommend it and I'm excited for the remainder of this four book series!
4⭐
On to the next book in this series, The Rules of Magic, that gives details about the Owens Family curse that began in 1620...
I've been itching to test the water's of Alice Hoffman's writing and with the Practical Magic Series being synonymous with this author's name, it seems like the perfect place to begin.
If you're thinking about reading this series, there are two options to consider before you begin. Do you read the books in the order written? OR in chronological order?
My choice was to begin where Alice Hoffman began writing...
Practical Magic is the story of Owens sisters Sally and Gillian who grew up in Massachusetts with their two elderly aunts. As children, they were viewed as outcasts, ridiculed, and treated like oddities to avoid and blame for anything awry in their small town. Although they look and act entirely different from one another, they share a dream of one day escaping to a place where no one knows who they are.
To tell you anything more would spoil your experience of reading Practical Magic...
I will tell you that Hoffman's writing style is, shall we say, unique. She packs a ton of information about the story and characters into one thought after another, in a rambling fashion that at first feels overwhelming, then addictive, and strangely enough, it all works. All the pieces and parts connect and flow together seamlessly. It's magical!
The characters are all a delightful surprise and even the most unlikable ones are interesting and creatively drawn. There are abundant deep emotions that swirl around the Owens sisters, sometimes it gets a little darker than expected, but the magic within the story is what's most memorable.
One small issue I experienced was the design of the book with four overly long sections that were between 56 - 95 pages. I enjoy a read with short chapters or, in this case, frequent section breaks that make a book feel like a faster read. It's a personal preference but I do know I'm not alone in this opinion.
Practical Magic was the perfect read to begin my October reading month and I enjoyed the heck out of it from beginning to end. I highly recommend it and I'm excited for the remainder of this four book series!
4⭐
On to the next book in this series, The Rules of Magic, that gives details about the Owens Family curse that began in 1620...
July 3, 2008
[Review written by my high school self]
I used to love the movie for this book, and I didn’t even know until after I had seen it that it was originally in book form. After finally getting a copy of the book and reading it, something magical happened: I didn’t know which one I liked better. Usually, having to decide favorites between the book and the movie is very easy. Except in the case of Grisham's The Pelican Brief, I almost always prefer the book versions. In some cases (as with Gone with the Wind and Scarlett), I simply refuse to see the movie, while in other cases (like The Great Gatsby and Jurassic Park) I prefer the book hands-down though the movie versions are certainly more than tolerable. With Hoffman’s Practical Magic, I just don’t know.
Part of the reason for this anomaly in my reading life may be the fact that the movie and book bear little resemblance to each other. Here is what is in the book that is also in the movie: the names of the characters (which in itself is a bit skewered), and the fact that this all has to do with witches, family, and magic. That’s about it. Other than that, even the basic plotline is very different. I can understand how the movie might need to condense the plotline to fit its regular two hours, but this plotline has been almost completely altered.
Unlike the movie, the book gives more equal attention to each of the sister protagonists, Sally and Gillian. This was both a good and a bad thing for me, due to my fascination with the characters and my partiality towards actress Sandra Bullock, who plays Sally in the movie version. The aunts, who are prominently figured in the movie as well, appear only as absent characters throughout most of the book. The children, Antonia and Kylie (their names are switched in the movie), are much older than their elementary school-age movie counterparts, and have very deep and intriguing characterizations that are lacking from the movie. Overall, the book does a better job of observing and presenting the importance, history, and closeness of sisterly relationships.
Hoffman’s writing has an utterly absorbing lyrical and poetic quality to it that I greatly admire. I ate this book up, partly because I was pushing for the protagonist Sally’s vindication (a point made in such a focused and concentrated manner in the movie), and partly because Hoffman’s writing is just superb and catching. I swallowed down pieces of this book for hours at a time, and would have to literally shake myself out of the mood of it all if I were so RUDELY interrupted. =)
The “magic” is of a different kind in the book, less magical in some senses, and focusing more on clairvoyance and intuition, a point much easier made and mystified in book form. Hoffman takes full charge of this, infusing this in every sentence of her text, and making the readers literary clairvoyants in their own sense. The predictability and unpredictability of this story makes it a book that can be read as I did in one gulp as I did or in a strolling leisurely fashion without losing anything of the book’s power or meaning.
Without a doubt, the movie has tainted, and at the same time, enhanced my reading of the book, so much so that I don’t even have a suggestion as to which medium persons should expose themselves to first. Should you read the book after seeing the movie, though, there are some things you should keep in mind. Certainly, one of the main things to remember is that Hoffman’s Gillian is no Nicole Kidman. Another thing to remember is that the movie, because of its required brevity, only touches upon the deep psychological implications and character insight of the book. Most importantly, the book characters don’t get wasted on midnight margaritas and dance around the dinner table to Harry Nillson’s “Coconut” song.
I used to love the movie for this book, and I didn’t even know until after I had seen it that it was originally in book form. After finally getting a copy of the book and reading it, something magical happened: I didn’t know which one I liked better. Usually, having to decide favorites between the book and the movie is very easy. Except in the case of Grisham's The Pelican Brief, I almost always prefer the book versions. In some cases (as with Gone with the Wind and Scarlett), I simply refuse to see the movie, while in other cases (like The Great Gatsby and Jurassic Park) I prefer the book hands-down though the movie versions are certainly more than tolerable. With Hoffman’s Practical Magic, I just don’t know.
Part of the reason for this anomaly in my reading life may be the fact that the movie and book bear little resemblance to each other. Here is what is in the book that is also in the movie: the names of the characters (which in itself is a bit skewered), and the fact that this all has to do with witches, family, and magic. That’s about it. Other than that, even the basic plotline is very different. I can understand how the movie might need to condense the plotline to fit its regular two hours, but this plotline has been almost completely altered.
Unlike the movie, the book gives more equal attention to each of the sister protagonists, Sally and Gillian. This was both a good and a bad thing for me, due to my fascination with the characters and my partiality towards actress Sandra Bullock, who plays Sally in the movie version. The aunts, who are prominently figured in the movie as well, appear only as absent characters throughout most of the book. The children, Antonia and Kylie (their names are switched in the movie), are much older than their elementary school-age movie counterparts, and have very deep and intriguing characterizations that are lacking from the movie. Overall, the book does a better job of observing and presenting the importance, history, and closeness of sisterly relationships.
Hoffman’s writing has an utterly absorbing lyrical and poetic quality to it that I greatly admire. I ate this book up, partly because I was pushing for the protagonist Sally’s vindication (a point made in such a focused and concentrated manner in the movie), and partly because Hoffman’s writing is just superb and catching. I swallowed down pieces of this book for hours at a time, and would have to literally shake myself out of the mood of it all if I were so RUDELY interrupted. =)
The “magic” is of a different kind in the book, less magical in some senses, and focusing more on clairvoyance and intuition, a point much easier made and mystified in book form. Hoffman takes full charge of this, infusing this in every sentence of her text, and making the readers literary clairvoyants in their own sense. The predictability and unpredictability of this story makes it a book that can be read as I did in one gulp as I did or in a strolling leisurely fashion without losing anything of the book’s power or meaning.
Without a doubt, the movie has tainted, and at the same time, enhanced my reading of the book, so much so that I don’t even have a suggestion as to which medium persons should expose themselves to first. Should you read the book after seeing the movie, though, there are some things you should keep in mind. Certainly, one of the main things to remember is that Hoffman’s Gillian is no Nicole Kidman. Another thing to remember is that the movie, because of its required brevity, only touches upon the deep psychological implications and character insight of the book. Most importantly, the book characters don’t get wasted on midnight margaritas and dance around the dinner table to Harry Nillson’s “Coconut” song.
October 21, 2017
I always like a bit of magic so I enjoyed this book very much, my only disappointment being that Sally and Gillian did not embrace their powers and use them! At least the aunts knew how to mix up a really good potion and cast an appropriate spell when necessary.
I enjoy the way Hoffman writes. Her characters are well rounded and likable, and her descriptions of things like the rampant lilac and hordes of toads in the garden are gorgeous.
Altogether a very readable, entertaining piece of nonsense. If you like witches you must read it:)
I enjoy the way Hoffman writes. Her characters are well rounded and likable, and her descriptions of things like the rampant lilac and hordes of toads in the garden are gorgeous.
Altogether a very readable, entertaining piece of nonsense. If you like witches you must read it:)
August 16, 2021
Very different from the movie!
The following ratings are out of 5:
Narration: 🎧🎧🎧🎧
Romance: 🖤💜💚🤎💙
Heat/Steam: 🔥🔥🔥
Story/Plot: 📙📕📗📘
World building: 🌎🌏🌍🌎🌍
Character development: 🤕🤬🤯😲
If you have seen the movie, you know it is about the curse on the Owen’s family with the main romance between Sally (Sandra Bullock) and Gary (Aiden Quinn) with Gillian (Nicole Kidman) being a main character but not in a romance, only getting out of a bad relationship in a magical way. The book was that and so much more.
For the most part, we can expect the book to be better than the movie or at the very least some parts cut out, but this was extremely different in my eyes. I loved the movie and I will continue to love it despite the book being so different. I just think they could have made a sequel and included more of the book into this.
Though after reading Magic Lessons and The Rules of Magic I think I would rather see either of those as a movie. Especially The Rules of Magic. Though they would need to make it a long movie because I can’t imagine parts of that cut out.
Anyway, the movie is about a few of the scenes from the book and isn’t really representative of the book as a whole. For example, both the book and the movie start with Sally and Gillian as children, but there are only a few short scenes of their childhood in the movie. Most of the book takes place when the two are in their late 20’s or early 30’s while Sally’s children are young.
The book delves deeper into the childhood of Sally and Gillian from the time they were with their parents and especially growing up with the aunts. It also goes past the ending of the movie and quite a bit of the book is Sally’s daughters growing up and the magic they have within them as well. Also there were some scenes where I really disliked Sally and Gillian, though I understood the scenes based on their personalities.
I really like Alice Hoffman’s writing style. She describes so much without making it look like offhand world-building as some authors seem to do. She does whimsy so well and I love how the magic is not always big and flashy, but is often little things like feelings, thoughts and things that seem to happen to them. It isn’t always good or things that they mean to do.
In the movie, Gillian doesn’t have nearly as big of a role as she does in the book. We see her run wild and come home with an abusive husband Jimmy. She and Sally get rid of him using magic, but he reappears and Gillian is possessed by him. Sally and the aunts with some help from the local women who had snubbed them in the past, get together to get rid of Jimmy and it pretty much ends soon after.
In the book, Gillian has a love interest, and gets quite steamy with him. Sally’s kids also have their own suitors. Sally has Gary Hallet (played in the movie by Aiden Quinn). We get to see what Gary is thinking and what drives him unlike the movie, he is much more of a romantic figure in the book.
I also really liked hearing about Sally’s girls, Kylie and Antonia. Kylie could see the man in their garden (Jimmy) when nobody else could. She sees that bees seem to like him and he appears more when it rains. He stares back at her when she watches him. Very spooky stuff.
Overall, I did like the book quite a bit. I liked Magic Lessons and The Rules of Magic better than this but I do think this is definitely worth the read. I will definitely be reading The Book of Magic, I loved Vincent in The Rules of Magic, he is brother to the aunts and grandfather to Gillian and Sally, though they never met him.
Blog|Goodreads|Facebook|Instagram|Twitter|BookBub
The following ratings are out of 5:
Narration: 🎧🎧🎧🎧
Romance: 🖤💜💚🤎💙
Heat/Steam: 🔥🔥🔥
Story/Plot: 📙📕📗📘
World building: 🌎🌏🌍🌎🌍
Character development: 🤕🤬🤯😲
If you have seen the movie, you know it is about the curse on the Owen’s family with the main romance between Sally (Sandra Bullock) and Gary (Aiden Quinn) with Gillian (Nicole Kidman) being a main character but not in a romance, only getting out of a bad relationship in a magical way. The book was that and so much more.
For the most part, we can expect the book to be better than the movie or at the very least some parts cut out, but this was extremely different in my eyes. I loved the movie and I will continue to love it despite the book being so different. I just think they could have made a sequel and included more of the book into this.
Though after reading Magic Lessons and The Rules of Magic I think I would rather see either of those as a movie. Especially The Rules of Magic. Though they would need to make it a long movie because I can’t imagine parts of that cut out.
Anyway, the movie is about a few of the scenes from the book and isn’t really representative of the book as a whole. For example, both the book and the movie start with Sally and Gillian as children, but there are only a few short scenes of their childhood in the movie. Most of the book takes place when the two are in their late 20’s or early 30’s while Sally’s children are young.
The book delves deeper into the childhood of Sally and Gillian from the time they were with their parents and especially growing up with the aunts. It also goes past the ending of the movie and quite a bit of the book is Sally’s daughters growing up and the magic they have within them as well. Also there were some scenes where I really disliked Sally and Gillian, though I understood the scenes based on their personalities.
I really like Alice Hoffman’s writing style. She describes so much without making it look like offhand world-building as some authors seem to do. She does whimsy so well and I love how the magic is not always big and flashy, but is often little things like feelings, thoughts and things that seem to happen to them. It isn’t always good or things that they mean to do.
In the movie, Gillian doesn’t have nearly as big of a role as she does in the book. We see her run wild and come home with an abusive husband Jimmy. She and Sally get rid of him using magic, but he reappears and Gillian is possessed by him. Sally and the aunts with some help from the local women who had snubbed them in the past, get together to get rid of Jimmy and it pretty much ends soon after.
In the book, Gillian has a love interest, and gets quite steamy with him. Sally’s kids also have their own suitors. Sally has Gary Hallet (played in the movie by Aiden Quinn). We get to see what Gary is thinking and what drives him unlike the movie, he is much more of a romantic figure in the book.
“At this moment, Gary wishes he could grab her and force her, at least until she gave in. He’d like to make love to her right here, he’d like to do it all night and not give a damn about anything else, and not listen if she told him no. But he’s not that kind of man, and he never will be. He’s seen too many lives go wrong when a man allows himself to be led around by his dick.”
I also really liked hearing about Sally’s girls, Kylie and Antonia. Kylie could see the man in their garden (Jimmy) when nobody else could. She sees that bees seem to like him and he appears more when it rains. He stares back at her when she watches him. Very spooky stuff.
Overall, I did like the book quite a bit. I liked Magic Lessons and The Rules of Magic better than this but I do think this is definitely worth the read. I will definitely be reading The Book of Magic, I loved Vincent in The Rules of Magic, he is brother to the aunts and grandfather to Gillian and Sally, though they never met him.
Blog|Goodreads|Facebook|Instagram|Twitter|BookBub
July 31, 2018
Charming, wicked. But also superficial and almost too flighty to take seriously or to dismiss as a prolonged adult fairy tale outright. The characters are all indisputably unique, so why do they sound exactly the same, with that similar tone of... Dullness? Being a witch is just SOO normal! Er, practical! The story jumps around like some impatient child, from characters to images (the aura of plants, the craziness of toads and cats, the thunderbolts of love) with little consideration for a reader who just wants a solid good story: the practical magic of a well-told novel.
April 21, 2026
I saw the film “Practical Magic” when it first came out decades ago and, after reading Alice Hoffman’s book, rewatched it. Right away, I could quickly see a huge disconnect between the novel and the film. I believe that disconnect occurred because of how this book was written.
Hoffman is absolutely brilliant; she’s a tremendously gifted writer and extremely descriptive, poetic even. The problem, from what I can see, is not just in her lack of chapters (the book was comprised of only a few sparse but very long so-called chapters) and the low amount of dialogue, but rather with how her book was arranged. Hoffman took deep dives into the lives of even Sally’s children. And, although these parts were extremely interesting, they almost detracted from the story.
The time periods for this book took place over several lifetimes, from Maria to Sally’s children. While Hoffman buried Jimmy under a lilac bush, for some strange reason, the filmmakers chose to have him buried beneath a rose bush. But it wasn’t just the lilac bush that changed. Nearly everything found in the novel is so different from the movie.
Even with Hoffman’s hyper-reliance on narration rather than dialogue, she’s such an engaging writer that I found it difficult to put the book down. The writer’s skill kept me engaged from the time the lilac bush was cut down to when the frog burped up the ring, but at times I felt like the story was dragging along.
Hoffman is absolutely brilliant; she’s a tremendously gifted writer and extremely descriptive, poetic even. The problem, from what I can see, is not just in her lack of chapters (the book was comprised of only a few sparse but very long so-called chapters) and the low amount of dialogue, but rather with how her book was arranged. Hoffman took deep dives into the lives of even Sally’s children. And, although these parts were extremely interesting, they almost detracted from the story.
The time periods for this book took place over several lifetimes, from Maria to Sally’s children. While Hoffman buried Jimmy under a lilac bush, for some strange reason, the filmmakers chose to have him buried beneath a rose bush. But it wasn’t just the lilac bush that changed. Nearly everything found in the novel is so different from the movie.
Even with Hoffman’s hyper-reliance on narration rather than dialogue, she’s such an engaging writer that I found it difficult to put the book down. The writer’s skill kept me engaged from the time the lilac bush was cut down to when the frog burped up the ring, but at times I felt like the story was dragging along.
July 12, 2022
A lifetime favorite type of book. My heart is bursting at the seams!!!!
CW: bullying, animal abuse, abortion, death of a loved one, domestic abuse, food shaming, sexual assault, suicide
CW: bullying, animal abuse, abortion, death of a loved one, domestic abuse, food shaming, sexual assault, suicide
November 17, 2021
I read Practical Magic many years ago and re-read very quickly just to reacquaint myself with the characters, and themes at play because I have started reading Rules of Magic, the prequel. However, I have been asked what I thought of Practical Magic, so here are some thoughts and I will review the Rules of Magic properly when I finish reading.
In summary, I don’t think you will be missing much if you pass on this one. Having now started the Rules of Magic, I can say that already the character and the storylines are much better developed in the prequel, and it will not spoil your reading experience if you go for the Rules of Magic first.
A little bit of the plot, Gillian and Sally go to live with their aunts in a small town in New England. The story unfolds with the girls realising they possess mystical powers but don’t have the maturity and awareness to know what to do with it or how to use it properly. However, as they are learning to cope with their newfound powers, they are rejected and feared by this small community and blamed for every misfortune that befalls the town. Obviously for the sins of the aunts. What is set up nicely for the prequel are the hints that the aunts are mischievous, dangerous and have a past, but as guardians the magic, the spells and the curses are suppressed in favour of the young witches learning a normal life.
Some things worth noting
- The film is missing a number of the plots from the book but equally the film has done its bit in raising the profile of the book from a bit of nothingness really. I don't mind saying this because the author has written some great books since and even the prequel is better.
- Perhaps combine the film with reading the book on Practical Magic for a better all rounded experience
- Best quotes
"For every evil under the sun, There is a remedy, or there is none. If there be one, seek till you find it, if there be none, never mind it."
"For the aunts tried to encourage her not to be so good. Goodness, in their opinion, was not a virtue but merely spinelessness and fear disguised as humility."
"She knows now that when you don’t lose yourself in the bargain, you find you have double the love you started with, and that’s one recipe that can’t be tampered with. "
"Always throw spilled salt over your left shoulder. Keep rosemary by your garden gate. Add pepper to your mashed potatoes. Plant roses and lavender, for luck. Fall in love whenever you can. "
If only life could be that easy.
2.5 stars rounded up to 3. Ok but not the best witchcraft, sorcery or spell binding book I have read.
In summary, I don’t think you will be missing much if you pass on this one. Having now started the Rules of Magic, I can say that already the character and the storylines are much better developed in the prequel, and it will not spoil your reading experience if you go for the Rules of Magic first.
A little bit of the plot, Gillian and Sally go to live with their aunts in a small town in New England. The story unfolds with the girls realising they possess mystical powers but don’t have the maturity and awareness to know what to do with it or how to use it properly. However, as they are learning to cope with their newfound powers, they are rejected and feared by this small community and blamed for every misfortune that befalls the town. Obviously for the sins of the aunts. What is set up nicely for the prequel are the hints that the aunts are mischievous, dangerous and have a past, but as guardians the magic, the spells and the curses are suppressed in favour of the young witches learning a normal life.
Some things worth noting
- The film is missing a number of the plots from the book but equally the film has done its bit in raising the profile of the book from a bit of nothingness really. I don't mind saying this because the author has written some great books since and even the prequel is better.
- Perhaps combine the film with reading the book on Practical Magic for a better all rounded experience
- Best quotes
"For every evil under the sun, There is a remedy, or there is none. If there be one, seek till you find it, if there be none, never mind it."
"For the aunts tried to encourage her not to be so good. Goodness, in their opinion, was not a virtue but merely spinelessness and fear disguised as humility."
"She knows now that when you don’t lose yourself in the bargain, you find you have double the love you started with, and that’s one recipe that can’t be tampered with. "
"Always throw spilled salt over your left shoulder. Keep rosemary by your garden gate. Add pepper to your mashed potatoes. Plant roses and lavender, for luck. Fall in love whenever you can. "
If only life could be that easy.
2.5 stars rounded up to 3. Ok but not the best witchcraft, sorcery or spell binding book I have read.
July 29, 2024
4.75 out of 5 stars!
I think I loved this as much as I loved the film.
——————————
Ever since I was little I always loved watching movies and tv series about witches that are set in the modern world. It used to be one of my most favoured genre to watch.
'Practical Magic' movie is so dear to me, and not because its cast includes some of my favorite actresses, but because it was a comforting movie for me. (It's not entirely cute and sunshine movie, and definitely do not recommend it to little kiddies to watch it often). 😅
The oddest part is that I didn't know the movie was based on the book. I actually found out about it when it was revealed that a sequel is coming out.
I think I loved this as much as I loved the film.
——————————
Ever since I was little I always loved watching movies and tv series about witches that are set in the modern world. It used to be one of my most favoured genre to watch.
'Practical Magic' movie is so dear to me, and not because its cast includes some of my favorite actresses, but because it was a comforting movie for me. (It's not entirely cute and sunshine movie, and definitely do not recommend it to little kiddies to watch it often). 😅
The oddest part is that I didn't know the movie was based on the book. I actually found out about it when it was revealed that a sequel is coming out.
August 30, 2020
Enjoyable, magical and made me feel very nostalgic.
June 2, 2010
I was a little hesitant about the rating to give this book. There are what I would call, good moments. Mostly I don't care for it. There is an odd streak of amorality underlying it (I can just hear someone asking "who's morals are you talking about"). You have the two old ladies referred to as "the aunts" who raise a young girl to be selfish, obstinate, and rebellious (treating these as the best of good desirable traits) and then wondering that tragedy follows. There are shifting personalities in the characters and twisting attitudes about right and wrong.
As always I felt it incumbent on me to mention that some love this book, but I find it terribly flawed and almost went all the way down to 1 star. It is saved by a few odd plot points and it's readability. In my "chauvinistic" way, I'd say this book will be far more popular with women than with men, but I found it readable. The author is known for writing YA books...which gave me some concern for a while.
The book is somewhat like a romantic ghost story, with a sort of mystery tacked on at the end. This was needed to give the romance finality.
I could go into a lot of problems in the book...even the understanding of love it puts forth. It's basically the common view confusing infatuation/desire with actual love. This view partially accounts for the high divorce rate. The type of love that makes a relationship last requires more than the "wow he/she's hot and I want him/her" we find here. The book also drops the "F" bomb now and again for no real apparent reason other than to impress us with the teenage rebellion it signals and possibly the book's daring.
Well, (I'd say "in short" here, but it's too late) I didn't hate the book, but I didn't like it ether. 1.5 stars I suppose, rounded up to 2.
As always I felt it incumbent on me to mention that some love this book, but I find it terribly flawed and almost went all the way down to 1 star. It is saved by a few odd plot points and it's readability. In my "chauvinistic" way, I'd say this book will be far more popular with women than with men, but I found it readable. The author is known for writing YA books...which gave me some concern for a while.
The book is somewhat like a romantic ghost story, with a sort of mystery tacked on at the end. This was needed to give the romance finality.
I could go into a lot of problems in the book...even the understanding of love it puts forth. It's basically the common view confusing infatuation/desire with actual love. This view partially accounts for the high divorce rate. The type of love that makes a relationship last requires more than the "wow he/she's hot and I want him/her" we find here. The book also drops the "F" bomb now and again for no real apparent reason other than to impress us with the teenage rebellion it signals and possibly the book's daring.
Well, (I'd say "in short" here, but it's too late) I didn't hate the book, but I didn't like it ether. 1.5 stars I suppose, rounded up to 2.
October 3, 2019
★★ /5
This was fine… I guess?!?
I defiantly see the appeal of this book, the premise is interesting, but execution let me down. I as a lot of people had seen the movie based on this book, so I had some sort of understanding of what should happen in this book, but sadly my hopes didn’t come true. Sadly, this book was really boring and full of filler content, literally, you can skip 70 percent of this book and you will not miss anything. The structure of this book was all over the place, and even the climax of the story wasn’t rewarding at all.
On the other hand, I really enjoyed the writing style, it’s one of the reasons why I kept reading it. In addition, I liked the characters, I found their relationships pretty interesting.
This was fine… I guess?!?
I defiantly see the appeal of this book, the premise is interesting, but execution let me down. I as a lot of people had seen the movie based on this book, so I had some sort of understanding of what should happen in this book, but sadly my hopes didn’t come true. Sadly, this book was really boring and full of filler content, literally, you can skip 70 percent of this book and you will not miss anything. The structure of this book was all over the place, and even the climax of the story wasn’t rewarding at all.
On the other hand, I really enjoyed the writing style, it’s one of the reasons why I kept reading it. In addition, I liked the characters, I found their relationships pretty interesting.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 19,162 reviews