I was given this book to read because of my familiarity with the region. I knew this town from the distant past, and had stayed in the hotel on many occasions.
I returned to live there in 2020 after staying again in the hotel, which I know well. I was resident in the town throughout the period covered by this book.
I became familiar with this 'story' through local press and multiple images and footage put out on social media by the hotel owner. Nothing went unpublicized, despite there being other venues in the town and throughout the UK involved in the 'everyone in' move.
I have both a personal and professional experience of homelessness, and became interested in these copious stories, particularly when statements were made that were at the very least, questionable. Because of this I chose on more than one occasion to speak to the guests resident at the hotel. What was notable was the almost cult like nervousness. It was difficult to get these folks to speak openly because they feared perhaps erroneously, being evicted from the hotel.
It was almost a joke with many in the town, that the next thing that would happen would be writing a book! That this occurred did not come as a surprise to many there.
But given the work of this author as a journalist, and the calibre of her previous books; this book is almost bizarre in its difference. We all know the scourge of C19, but the book starts in the manner of a disaster movie; I almost expected to hear the music from 'Jaws'! This build up I believe, was designed to show sacrifice and dedication. To be blunt; altruism was not the focus.
I was most certainly not alone in being concerned about some matters, and know that there has been quite considerable poetic licence in some statements to print and electronic media throughout the year. Even social media video footage was altered to show a building that is simply not where it was filmed! It would not be wise to expand, though there is/was a fair degree of frustration in being made aware through media, and this book, that a 'story' was being publicized, rather than a true situation. The town IS lovely, but there is a very prominent hierarchy there where the owner of the hotel is chairman of a Council business group.
I left the town in part because of this hierarchy, after 15 months.
The book really does speak for itself. If this book was about homeless people, then why does it need to refer to mattress types, and toiletry brands? This is almost text book publicity put out by the hotel itself! Why is it necessary to write what time the lovely co owner of the hotel, goes up to bed, or the appearance of the accountant, or even the shape of the face of the manager? That has little to do with homeless guests. Should they be grateful for that, perhaps?
There are/were not 100 homeless people in Shrewsbury. (A figure claimed by the hotel owner). Had there been, they would have been lined up shoulder to shoulder on the main thoroughfare where they are generally to be found. It was one of many spurious claims made to elevate the hotel above other venues doing the same thing.
Books that do actually deal with homelessness; the experience; the causes are available. I have just read one which is sad and funny and poignant. This is NOT a book about homelessness. This is a book about the people in a 'four star hotel sacrificing life as we know it to dedicate themselves' etc. Hospitality sites lay bare the vagaries of the starring system, particularly in relation to this hotel. It was however, a palace to those guests, and without question, they were sheltered and fed well.
What I find so objectionable, is the interviewing of these souls almost as an adjunct to show three people as heroes, though specifically two. And it of course, involved more than just two/three people. There has been little to no acknowlegement of that.
One homeless guest who featured strongly in video footage, and this book, was searingly, rawly vulnerable, fearing going back to the streets, and was in revere of the owner; (who was always to be addressed as 'Mr'). He returned to what he most feared. He is now in prison. When there was no successful outcome in the residents being housed etc, both the author and the co owner of the hotel have laid the blame for that at the feet of the homeless person; it was subtle; but it was there. Frankly that angers me.
-----------------------------------
I am immensely saddened and frustrated that sometimes it is the 'celebrity of author' which elevates the profile of a book rather than the merits of the book itself. Press reviews for this book seem to bear this out. I am astonished that there appears to have been no checks to assess veracity. Everything was taken at face value.
I have donated the other excellent books of this author to a charity shop. They at least, are very good.
This book tells a story. My issue is with the word ''true''.