Through a historical reading, Ruggiero examines how The Decameron would have been understood by a broader public and how it reflects a Florence that is promising ‘a new age of love’ in a climate of ‘death’ and ‘dissolution’ (11).
The introduction is a great background to Florence's shifting class system and the contemporary prophecies promising a new age ‘of the Spirit’ (10). With the ‘popolo grosso’ replacing nobles, new ‘cultural markers’ for the elite were created, the most important being ‘virtù’ (18). Moving away from its previous links to violence and honour, virtù came to emphasise refined manners and ‘reason over emotion’ within the commercial empire of Florence. Virtù was particularly connected to love and Boccaccio presents virtù and marriage as ways to ‘civilise’ violent passions (26).
Ruggiero’s discussions are original, particularly his analysis of the tales of Nastagio, Lisabetta and Alibech, where he diverts from commonly explored themes, such as the allusions to Dante’s Inferno in the tale of Nastagio.
The main strength of this text is its accessibility - its entertaining writing style, broad index, paraphrasing of each relevant novella and delicate breakdown of context and ‘virtù’, allow anyone, even those completely unfamiliar with The Decameron, to read this book and understand its points.
There are some ideas that could benefit from further development. Although ‘Boccaccio-writer’ is brought up throughout the text and adequately explored, ‘Boccaccio-character’ is never again addressed after the introduction, leaving readers confused as to its function and importance. Another concept that could be explored further is Ruggiero’s argument that Boccaccio’s text relates to us in contemporary times. Ruggiero states that what we learn about love may help us ‘respond to the dislocations and traumas’ of our own (4). Besides occasional broad comments about the nature of love today, such as it being a ‘number one google search’ (35), Ruggiero does not prove much relevance. His desire that we see how the tales ‘contributed in a foundational way… to visions of marriage, love, and sexuality that… underpin Western notions… today.’ (185) is not directly fulfilled, although as readers we may make our own comparisons without authorial prompting. This concept requires more research, particularly the point that in modern times love has been ‘pared down’ through ‘a complex process of adapting emotions to different societies and cultures’ (29).
Finally, there was a missed opportunity to explore violent masculinity, specifically within the tale of Guiglielmo. Although Ruggiero examined the violence of Tancredi, Rinieri and the knight in the story of Nastagio, Guiglielmo, who feeds his wife her lover’s heart, a deed which ‘reflected a particularly troubling form of virtù.’, lacked analysis (63). I want to know more about this ‘troubling form of virtù’ and how it encouraged violence in men in response to their consensus realities as successful, masculine lovers being threatened. Perhaps a comparison could also be made between Nastagio and Guiglielmo who both commit acts of violence (Nastagio’s being self-inflicted) in response to this threat.