"ALWAYS CHANGING AND ALWAYS THE SAME"
Ironically, I had just started reading this history when Elizabeth II passed into it. A retired history teacher who has taught a lot of world history survey courses, I never really grasped all the complexities within the line of succession in the British monarchy and have always wanted to understand it better. In about 500 pages, Borman gives us, perhaps, the most succinct accounting of more than one thousand years of British history to date.
Do I now have a thorough understanding of the line of succession? Certainly not. That would take a concentrated study, not a casual reading of this book, but if I cared to put forth the effort, Borman gives me an easy to comprehend resource by which to do it.
If you're not a history geek like me, you will probably find this book a bit laborious. It does, at times, read like your textbook from a dull history class. Mostly, however, it does an excellent job at explaining the twists and turns in British monarchial rule down to the present day putting the monarchy now (and really since the nineteenth century) at figurehead status. Borman's scholarship is evident and well documented and again, you would be hard pressed to digest this amount of historical information in proper context in one single source.
Throughout most of the narrative Borman remains appropriately neutral on the question of the relevancy of the British crown in the modern era. However, as she moves through the twentieth century, she begins to increasingly bring it up. It has become a frequent subject for debate in British society. There's an economic term (I taught economics as well, lol) called "creative destruction." It means that sometimes to achieve progress, old processes, dare I say institutions, must be abandoned or destroyed to make room for the new, even if they hold sentimental attachment to the many or the few. Borman cites polls over the decades that show the popularity of the monarchy has clearly waxed and waned over time, usually effected negatively by royal scandals. Clearly that's at the heart of the question posed here. Especially during the reign of Elizabeth II, the cost to British taxpayers of maintaining this highly symbolic, but marginally utilitarian institution has been significantly reduced and streamlined. "At the end of the day" (a favorite British colloquialism) however, the monarchy remains with significant cost to the British citizenry and shows no signs of going way any time soon.
Borman's book was published this past February (2022) and she predicts that when Elizabeth II passes, there will be renewed debate on the relevancy of the monarchy in modern day Britain. With the accession of her oldest son, King Charles III, we see that conversation has not (yet) really begun. Clearly, Borman sees no conflict of interest in the advancement of progress for the British Commonwealth, while at the same time, maintaining and protecting the very institution that defines it.