Hi there, this is not a review ... consider it to be author notes (a spoiler free version!) However I have included the very first 'hot off the shelf' trade review of GOLAN at the end of the notes, if you are looking for an impartial review.
AUTHOR NOTES
One of the aims of the Future War series is to show future wars and conflicts from the points of view of the soldiers, sailors and airmen who will fight them – on all sides of a conflict.
Nations will disagree, and the disagreements between the nations in this novel - Israel, Iran, Syria, Turkey - can in some cases be traced back thousands of years. Sadly, I believe war between Israel and Iran is a conflict waiting to happen, and it is not a question of if it happens this century, but when. Any book about a conflict between Iran and Israel is potentially controversial.
In GOLAN I have tried not to take sides, but rather let the ebb and flow of the events – which often take a life of their own while being written – come to a natural, unforced conclusion. Any writer of course brings their conscious and unconscious bias to their work and if yours differs from mine, then I hope we can agree to disagree. You are welcome to open a debate on my FB author page!
In each Future War novel I focus on the possible application of one of more emerging military technologies. In GOLAN that focus is primarily on the battlefield application of small armed drones. These are drones usually weighing under 20lb or 10kg, which can be carried by infantry squads, deployed from manned or unmanned ground vehicles, and even printed on demand using parts made by 3D printers.
If you need an example of how advanced this technology is, and where it is going, think about this: as I was writing GOLAN, NASA flew a tiny unmanned drone … on Mars!
Israel is a world leader in the research and development of this technology. Already in the Israeli inventory now, or in advanced stages of development, are: reconnaissance micro drones the size of large insects; high level reconnaissance drones almost invisible to radar and the naked eye and able to loiter over targets for hours; combat drones which can be launched by infantry to attack targets inside buildings or hiding behind cover, with anti-personnel or anti-armor grenades; unmanned remotely-operated weapons systems; aerial drones which can be used to either detect mines, or even to lay mines. At a larger scale, are unmanned aerial vehicles - both armed and unarmed - and unmanned ground vehicles.
Another application many military writers explore is the potential of AI to support both tactical and strategic decision making. In GOLAN I took that one further, asking myself what would happen if a nation combined AI with an autonomous underwater vehicle and – not least of all – atomic weapons. AI breakthroughs will offer the opportunity for the makers of naval vessels to reduce, or even eliminate, human crews on maritime platforms.
In GOLAN I chose a model by which a nuclear armed vessel was still crewed by officers who had the ultimate responsibility for using nuclear weapons – their commands cannot be overridden by the AI. But with the human crew much reduced in size, I wanted to explore how decisions between a limited number of individuals, prompted by an AI, might play out.
Finally, in GOLAN I explore the idea of an All Domain Kill Chain – a military strike which utilizes data from space, air forces, ground radars, ground and naval forces, to quickly and effectively destroy a target. Also taking that to its ultimate end, the All Domain Attack, which is how major wars in the future will be fought. A surprise attack – the future equivalent of a Pearl Harbor – can be executed with almost complete anonymity in the cyber and space domains. Economies can be crippled, and communications catastrophically disrupted, by nation states hiding in the shadows.
How then should a nation respond to such an attack? Against who should they direct their retaliation?
Imagine a Pearl Harbor in which the US could not prove it was Japan who had attacked them. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the allies of the US declared war on Japan within days, sometimes within hours. But if the attacking aircraft had been invisible, if the damage caused had been entirely deniable, would the allies of the US have rallied around it so quickly and completely?
Imagine now a Pearl Harbor where this invisible attacker went after Wall Street and the communications infrastructure of the USA first. Where the bombs they dropped didn’t hit battleships, but the economy, the internet, cellular, satellite and electricity networks, both military and civilian. Where kinetic air, sea and ground warfare was the second phase of the attack, not the first. How much pain would the US have been able or willing to suffer before it lashed out at its perceived adversary – with or without proof?
Now add nuclear weapons into that mix and imagine that one adversary had either a complete or partial nuclear weapons advantage over the other.
If you see parallels between events in GOLAN and the Cuban Missile Crisis, they are deliberate, right down to the element of ‘fog of war’ President Kennedy complains about in the opening quote. Oliver Henderson’s address to the nation in GOLAN was modelled on President Kennedy’s address at the onset of the Cuban Missile Crisis. But where President Kennedy managed a crisis that stretched over nearly two weeks, modern warfighting, intelligence gathering and dissemination, and speed of communications, will not give our future State leaders the same luxury. Hence the All Domain Attack described in GOLAN takes place over just four days.
I hope as the reader, similar to myself as the author, you find it very hard to pull a winner or a loser out of this conflict.
I don’t much like quoting failed leaders, but the thoughts of British pre-war PM, Neville Chamberlain, are apt here: In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.
FX Holden
Copenhagen, June 2021
READERS' FAVORITE REVIEW (UNEDITED)
Reviewed By K.C. Finn for Readers’ Favorite, 21 June 2021
Golan: This Is The Future Of War is a work of fiction in the military, action, and thriller sub-genres, and was penned by author F. X. Holden. The work is intended for the general adult reading audience and contains mild profanities and references to military conflict throughout. Set across the globe in various locations and told through the eyes of different participants on the front lines of both conflict and decision making, this novel asks important questions about the future of nuclear conflict and what could happen if restrictions were lifted on weaponry. What results is a very engrossing blockbuster military tale that is sure to keep readers turning the pages from cover to cover.
Author F. X. Holden has crafted a cinematically vivid work of fiction with plenty of twists, turns, and surprises to offer readers alongside its suitably complex plot. Having read some of the author’s work before, I knew I’d be in for a wild ride with plenty of action, varied characters, and interesting situations, but this particular novel had such a desperately exciting and realistic feel to it that it has swiftly become my new favorite. There is certainly something for every reader amongst the cast of well-developed characters, but for me personally, it was wayward pilot Bunny O’Hare who stole the show. Overall, I would highly recommend Golan: This Is The Future Of War to fans of immersive military fiction, original storytelling and plot ideas, and for readers of near-future action stories everywhere.