Do you want to improve your brain power by thinking critically in your daily life? Do you want to practice logical exercises to better your decision- making skills? Are you seeking confidence in your arguments and wish to think more efficiently? If you find yourself wanting to know more about critical thinking strategies, you've found the perfect solution. This workbook is for the individual who wants to think clearly and organized - for the person who wants to make the best decisions for themselves. Critical thinking is a mindset more than a technique. It allows us to unlock our intellectual independence and gives us wisdom and authority. Critical thinking involves a slow thought-out experience of deciding whether you agree or disagree. Instead of feeling trapped in that "grey-area" of decision-making, you'll learn how to solve problems with accuracy and efficiency. The Foundation for Critical Thinking, a non-profit dedicated to promoting education for critical thinking, wrote a 2019 article titled, Our Conception of Critical Thinking . They state, "Critical thinking is that mode of thinking -- about any subject, content, or problem -- in which the thinker improves the quality of his or her thinking by skillfully analyzing, assessing, and reconstructing it. The result? A well-cultivated critical thinker who raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely." This workbook In this guide, you'll ... and much, much more! There's no need to second-guess your decisions anymore. Critical thinking provides ownership in our beliefs which gives us true freedom of thought. Click "Add to Cart" now to start taking personal responsibility for your thinking and confidently support what you believe in.
Poorly Done Basics of Critical Thinking and Its Processes
I didn't see this supposed two-in-one collection as critical thinking hacks at all. In it, the author describes the basics and processes of critical thinking—in very poor terms—but I didn't really see any things I would particularly call a *hack*. I didn't see where the clear division of the supposed two books was. The writing felt amateurish and weak, with a strong reliance on false subjects ("there" expressions) and impassive personal expressions ("it" expressions where the *it* does not refer to any specific noun). The topic of the subtitle wasn't explored at all. Much of the book read like a badly done term paper, pulling from multiple sources without much analysis. All in all, I think you could find much better books about critical thinking.
I received a free copy of this book, but that did not affect my review.