Full disclosure, I do listen to Ben Shapiro with some regularity and generally consider myself, to some extent, a libertarian, although I'm aware there are all sorts of stereotypes and nasty connotations that label provides, so I'm going to do my very best at giving a perspective on this short book from my own frame of mind.
The premise of The Authoritarian Moment is that modern day leftists, clearly distinguishable from liberals, are using authoritarian tactics to push specific political agendas that are in overt opposition to the principles which America was founded on. The argument seems to open with an open acknowledgement that any political party can be driven to authoritarianism when left unchecked, but that the present state of affairs seems to learn toward radical leftism as the primary threat in the modern American age. These authoritarian tactics are shown by Shapiro to be present America's educational institutions, scientific communities, large corporations, sports and entertainment institutions, media institutions, and so-called Big Tech, with a focus on the role social media plays in pushing authoritarian goals.
Given the extreme polarity of our political environment, the immediate impression is that readers of this book who intentionally sought the book out because they agree with Shapiro (and like to be angry) are going to generally nod in agreement that, yes, indeed, there are concerning trends toward leftist authoritarianism. Conversely, those who read the book because they are leftists and for whatever reason want to seek out an opposition opinion (and like to be angry), I'm somewhat certain they'll rebuff at the exaggerations of agenda-pushing by all of their favorite institutions. So it goes.
The fundamental conceit, then, is whether or not Shapiro's argument is convincing enough to support his thesis. For the sake of simplicity, that thesis is that the left is using authoritarian tactics to weaponize institutions against conservatives and moderates. I include moderates because there is some brief discussion in the book over this topic. Again, as a biased observer and regular listener of Shapiro (meaning none of his arguments are particularly new to me), I can't help but feel like the argument is sound. There is plenty enough evidence (to me) that the absurdity of institutional agenda-pushing has reached new heights in the last decade, enough even to refute the general tendency toward whataboutism, that being but what about Fox News? What about Rush Limbaugh? What about...Ben Shapiro?. Blatant and unapologetic political bias in a media forum is not enough for me to drop consideration for the overt institutionalized adoption of leftism's ideals, although, at heart, it should be noted that there isn't much discussion in the book on why these ideals are inherently bad unless they directly contradict with some founding principle of the United States.
Shapiro's arguments occasionally falter, however, when he lapses into occasional hyperbole, like insinuating that the left wants us all to "walk around with Robin DiAngelo's book in hand proclaiming our racism" and similar attitudes. I've never been a fan of this exaggerated prose as it tends to sound juvenile and does Ben no favors in his image as a fast-talking conservative poster-boy over that of a qualified intellectual media personality.
I find it a very unfortunate mistake that Shapiro incorrectly credited Heather Heying, formerly of Evergreen State College and involved in a race controversy with her husband Bret Weinstein, as Heather Heyer, who was killed in the 2017 Unite-the-Right rally in Charlottesville. I hope this gets corrected in later printings.
Lastly, I found no real inspiration in his final call to action, which was disappointing, in that it was essentially "don't accept cancel culture" and "don't give your money to institutions that embrace this leftist authoritarianism." That's all fine and good I suppose, but it left me feeling no better in echoing Ben's sentiments that I worry for our future generations and their potential embrace for an America with fewer freedoms than those the country was founded upon.
All in all, I think this was a serious attempt in at the very least providing a digestible overview into the absurdity at which our political system exists from a conservative perspective, and I certainly think Shapiro is a serious voice in that discussion, whether or not I agree with everything he says. Indeed, that's the great tribal problem, isn't it? We have so forcefully placed ourselves in myriad identity groups that it seems to be nearly impossible to communicate these days that individuals within those groups are able to hold conflicting beliefs. Of course, that is not the reality of our political climate, but then so it goes with any political book.
No one who needs to read this is going to agree with it. Everyone who already agrees with it doesn't really need to read it.