**144th Climate Book**
The book's real strength, and why I gave it four stars, is the acknowledgement of the value and role of the full range of human emotions in the face of the climate crisis. I've tried for years(/decades) to walk the line demanded of climate communicators: don't scare people! emphasize hope! inspire people! talk about the utopian future we can build! avoid moralizing! if you slip up and cause fear or shame in your audience you are directly responsible for our imminent collapse (not the fossil fuel companies, perish the thought)!
Do you know, the only way to do this is to lie? I don't like lying. I think our current situation is terrifying and that fear (and shame) are reasonable responses.
Britt Wray is very supportive of feeling the dark stuff and being willing to face it, and that is fully deserving of four stars on its own. Also she is a clear writer with a good style.
Much of the background information was repetitive for me (caveat: this is my 144th climate book; I wasn't expecting to learn much new about climate change itself, or the socioeconomic issues surrounding it). It all seemed reasonably accurate and a good summary to me.
My one frustration is the treatment of government, but that's a pretty significant frustration. I've worked for many government agencies in my career, as well as the private sector, and I've volunteered and worked with non-profits, and humans are the same everywhere. People don't go into environmental careers in the government because they hate people and want to block progress and kill people. Yet that is the general tone here (to be fair Wray's book is not alone in this). Actions are focused on "internal activism" (i.e. therapy, which is a great thing to do, but not effective, and my own experience shows I think that you can do a lot of good work even if you feel like shit) and small group actions on a neighbourhood or household level.
Aiming activism at the policy/legislative work that would make the large-scale changes we need is not given the treatment it needs; instead, her view of this is pessimistic ("no one is coming to save us," etc.). Particularly after working in a government agency for 2 1/2 years of a pandemic where I saw my colleagues bust their asses and burn out responding to crises and doing their best to support people, it just pisses me off.
I recommend the book, but not on its own, and not for policy solutions. It's a solid guide to climate feelings, but for the "what to do" conversation, look elsewhere.