Review of Where the Bones Lie by Steve Haberman
One of the best things books do for their readers is to carry them to places and times remote from their own. This is the most enjoyable aspect of Where the Bones Lie by Steve Haberman.
Set in immediate post-WWII Berlin, Haberman allows the city and its remaining survivors to become almost an additional protagonist in his story. Physically, it challenges his heroes, Jonas Shaw and Charly Lawrence, with broken streets, shattered buildings, unreliable utilities, and collapsed infrastructure. Politically it befuddles them with four separate sets of authority and language. Socially, it endangers them through lawlessness, predation, and rape culture that hangs over the city’s women, including Charly, like an oppressive fog.
But it also charms and encourages them through its people, their sources, who demonstrate some of the most profound survival instincts even when they, at that moment in the story, appear to be on an opposite side:
QUOTE:"Frau Charly has been in the countryside with us the last few days," Oskar said, "getting some fresh air and doing some most interesting sightseeing as well, Herr Shaw. She has quite a story to tell. Isn't that right, Frau Charly? But first," he continued, not caring to hear any response from her, "as your host, Herr Shaw, Willkommen to what's left of our once proud and mighty city. I apologize for this stupid quarters," he noted, gesturing with a showman's flair to the water dripping from the ceiling down a wall. "The Hotel Adlon isn’t available. Neither is any other luxury palace. We are left with this filthy war relic.” ENDQUOTE
Unfortunately, the rest of the novel is not quite as strong. It has echoes of John le’Carré’s Smiley’s People, in that sense of professionals trying to work in a world where nothing else appears to function. But the work lack’s le Carré’s smooth delivery and his tight storyline.
Part of the problem rests with the novel’s two somewhat dueling protagonists. The book is marketed as a Jonas Shaw and Charly Lawrence novel. Still, this reader wondered if it wouldn’t have been better to have given the protagonist role to one of them and let the other remain a critical secondary character. There is a romantic storyline between the two. Still, it often gets subsumed beneath other, more compelling narratives and leaves the reader wondering if the novel is Jonas’ story or Charly’s.
The novel also has an unfortunate propensity to get lost in the detail of disputes. Where le Carré used a sentence or two and an atmosphere of frustration to convey bureaucratic arguments and distrust to a reader, Haberman devoted two chapters to one dispute-filled meeting that this reader found discouraging and didn’t add to his understanding of the story at all.
Finally, except for the two chapters mentioned above, the novel does an excellent job of keeping the reader’s interest. As the story progresses, Haberman keeps raising the stakes (as he should). Something terrible is going to happen if our heroes fail. Something that will kill and wound many people. But then, it’s not that big a deal when it happens, so the reader is left feeling somewhat cheated and bewildered.
On the one hand, this reader understands Haberman’s dilemma. Since he’s writing about a real-time place with actual history, he can’t just introduce disasters even if they would make a good story. But he could have taught near-disasters that might have threatened but which we would never have known because our heroes prevented their taking place.
Overall, the book’s strengths outweigh the weaknesses, so I feel good giving four stars out of five.