Some of us read historical fiction to be immersed in the cultural artifacts and surroundings of an earlier time. Others of us read historical fiction in an attempt to get our heads around how individuals might have reacted personally to the headline news of our awareness. Good historical fiction taps into the universal human emotions as expressed in different circumstances. Great historical fiction does so while fleshing out the outlines of those “headlines” we “know” from history with different perspectives and somewhat veiled analysis of the history from the perspective of the protagonists and those around them. Half in Shadow is a wonderful novel. It is good solid historical fiction in terms of cultural immersion (Belgium during the German occupation of World War I) and human emotion (reaction to loss, love, betrayal, fear, sacrifice, and courage). The only reason I don’t rate it five (5) stars on my arbitrary rating scale is because it doesn’t really flesh out the outline described above. Still, Half in Shadow is an impactful book in terms of emotion.
Half in Shadow is an excellent title for the story of a young Belgian female protagonist named Josephine Descharmes who is immediately faced with loss, guilt, and the challenge of survival. Her attitude toward the invading “Boche” moves from hatred through ambivalence to empathy and, to some extent, back again. Her sense of guilt for circumstances largely (if not completely) out of her control leads her into the shadows of resistance. And it is in those shadows that she must deal with her feelings. At first, she does not want to work in the restaurant which, for survival, serves a clientele almost exclusively of Germans. Because of what she has experienced, she needs the wise counsel of the restaurant manager: “You must draw a line between what was and what is. Only then can you leave the past in some context and allow yourself to make the best of what you have now.” (p. 100) Indeed, her conflicting emotions are well-summarized by a German officer who both clarifies and complicates her feelings. “Time does not change the past, but it allows us the opportunity to change our hearts.” This consideration enhanced a few lines later when he states: “I just don’t believe we should wish for the things we can’t undo. It stops us from building bridges, from healing, from living.” (p. 127) Eventually, Josephine’s thoughts express her confusion to a mysterious young noblewoman who has acquired a dubious reputation: ““But how does one know if they are doing right anymore? Whom to trust?”(p. 215)
If Half in Shadow were merely Josephine’s story, it would be emotional enough, but it is also the story of Arthur Shine—victim of tragedy and a gross miscarriage of justice (such a miscarriage inspired the writing of this novel itself). Arthur is an English soldier who enlists later in life after his son has been killed on those bloody fields of France and his wife, torn with grief, not only withdraws from him emotionally but elects to separate from him to find time for healing. In grief and guilt, feeling he really has nothing to lose, Arthur enlists and refuses the rank of non-commissioned officer he is offered to further identify with his lost son. So, we not only see the events transpiring from the perspective of one experiencing the occupation but of one involved on the battlefield. Admittedly, the balance of the book is on the former rather than the latter, but I believe the balance is just right.
Battlefield insights are not so much about the horrifying futility we know was present in some of these senseless actions brought about by the arrogance and ambition of the top brass. Rather, the insights bring the futility home to individuals. In a piece of correspondence from the front, Arthur writes: “Being this close to the enemy, my eyes had the chance to wander curiously over the faces of the men who had, till then, been seen as one giant beast to slay, not these pallid human scales that have fallen from its back.” (p. 63) More tellingly, we engage his thoughts after he becomes somewhat battle-hardened: “It is only after several days of rest that it grows hardest to go over. Those brief days of rest, of knowing they are going back, make one a little weaker. They have tasted an ounce of peace.” (p. 159)
I am trying to avoid the last third of the book where the most dramatic encounters occur. Yet, any reader knows that a book covering war is going to be filled with death and tragedy, so I want to share one particularly vivid (at least to me) line which occurs after one such tragic scene. After the seeming inevitable death, words of comfort and encouragement are offered. One of the main characters realizes that the actual words will quickly be forgotten because: “days. It’s how grief works to begin with. It suspends all rational thought. It waits insidiously behind the pretence of normalcy, then ambushes its prey when they least expect it, often at their weakest.” (pp. 268-269).
As with both novels by Gemma Liviero (I previously devoured In a Field of Blue as an Amazon Prime read.), the story is bittersweet. Protagonists struggle against incredible odds and the openings for proverbial happy endings are shaded by realism. Yes, there is some triumph and some resolution such as one might expect, but there are nuances and suggestions beyond expectation. In short, Half in Shadow is thoughtful, moving, and satisfying. It may not have everything one might desire in historical fiction, but it has more than enough to satisfy.