Let me tell you how “Playmakers” is structured. You know how Florio writes his snarky opinion pieces on ProFootballTalk? Every chapter of this book is one of those columns. They’re all style with very little substance, colored with Florio’s traditional holier-than-thou judgment passed towards the NFL, its players, its owners, and its fans. What I’ve come to realize is that Florio is a sportswriter in the sense that he writes about the NFL. He is not in any sense of the word a sports journalist. He does not investigate, he does not inquire, he does not research. He wonders, writes about his thoughts, and presses publish.
The tagline to the book, “How the NFL Really Works (And Doesn’t)” is intentionally misleading. How Florio marketed the book on his website and elsewhere was that of a hidden treasure trove of previously unknown league secrets. This was going to be big, I thought. Even if it didn’t shake the foundations of the league as we know it, could there be some hidden facts and details about the league’s most scandalous stories that were just waiting to be brought to light? Was there a reason that, in Florio’s own words, the league didn’t want this book published? Well, no, at least, not in this text. It’s basically a historical retelling of some recent events in NFL history broken up into different categories. As a football fan, you most likely already know the stories. Remember how Terrell Owens was behaving badly to get out of his Eagles contract? Well, that happened, and guess what? He was JUSTIFIED because he KNEW HIS WORTH. Real brave statement there, player with talent deserves more money. You know how teams apply the franchise tag to prevent star players from leaving in free agency? That’s a BAD THING for the PLAYERS and FANS SHOULD KNOW THAT. Hoo boy, try to cool yourself off after a take that scorching hot. There is, I kid you not, an entire chapter dedicated to the simple notion that, when assistant coaches and coordinators don’t succeed as head coaches, they have to become assistant coaches and coordinators once again. Even the factual recollections of historical NFL events contain nothing in the way of new details and revelations. There’s nothing new to say about why Andrew Luck retired, although Florio remembers turning on his phone during an outing at a Broadway show with his wife to learn of it at the time. (Real football fans would have spurned Broadway and the wife and would already be tuned in to NFL Network to watch the preseason game that was on when the news broke.)
What gets me about this format and structure is that Florio already does this on an everyday basis for his ProFootballTalk website. His column is chock-full of ‘revelations’ like these. Citing his prior career as an attorney, Florio passes judgment upon the league and the events surrounding it. Florio’s knowledge of legalese can be genuinely helpful here because much of the NFL’s problems wind up being resolved in the courtroom or settled before they can reach the courtroom. Florio can break down the complexities to those without law degrees and explain the implications. He’s free to do so without much league oversight because compared to most other NFL news-breakers, he is relatively isolated from a television perspective. Unlike the much-maligned Adam Schefter and his entanglements with Mr. Editor, Florio’s employer is secure in its television contract with the NFL and not in danger of any backlash should one of his scalding hot takes reflect poorly on the league. The title of the book isn’t even original, and Florio admits this: He lifted it from a television drama ESPN produced about a fictional football league that the NFL used its influence to cancel. Florio is not the kind of writer that breaks news and makes headlines, he’s not an ‘NFL Insider’ with sources around the league’s many front offices. So what’s the problem?
The problem lies in Florio’s tone. From a literary perspective, a writer’s tone establishes the writer’s attitude towards a specific topic. For Florio, this topic would be the NFL and everything surrounding it. The tone Florio utilizes is that of a standoffish know-it-all, a sarcastic seer sitting in front of a cloudy crystal ball. This results in a narrative voice that supposes Florio somehow knows all the possible answers, considers all the outcomes, and holds all the cards, even regarding topics he cannot possibly have any insight on. The only certainty is that there is no certainty, just the endless realm of possibility from which any story’s ultimate outcome is defensible. Despite numerous instances in which he has been dead wrong on such topics, the tone and narrative voice remains the same. There’s no humility, no accountability, no rectifying mistakes. Let’s take a recent PFT column written by Florio as an example.
“Could Colts make a trade for Kirk Cousins?” is the clickbait headline Florio utilizes to start things off. What follows are several spaced-out sentences of supposition. There aren’t many great options for the Colts to upgrade at quarterback. Washington overpaid for the Colts’ old starter Carson Wentz out of desperation. Kirk Cousins would provide stability at the position, albeit with receivers that aren’t as good as what he has in Minnesota. All ‘stating the obvious’-type observations.
Then comes the Florio signature, in a brief, four-sentence paragraph: “Cousins has shown no inclination to extend his deal with Minnesota. Nor should he. Maybe he would do so for the Colts. That would make him more attractive, and more valuable in a trade.” Ah, Cousins shouldn’t extend his existing Minnesota deal. Why shouldn’t he? No reason or justification is given, it’s just an unsupported opinion. Maybe he would change his mind with Indianapolis. Okay, what evidence is there to support this? Are there any connections or relationships that exist that would suggest Cousins would do this? If there are, Florio didn’t put them in his column. Later on, Florio goes off-topic to again state the obvious by revealing, shock of shocks here, that if Cousins were to go to the Colts, then, gasp! The VIKINGS would need a starting quarterback! Good golly gosh, who could THAT mystery player be? Deshaun Watson, perhaps? “For the same reason the Colts may be willing to go all in with Cousins for a year, the Vikings may be, too.” More maybes, no facts. No evidence. Just…mights. Perhapses. Possiblys. So, could the Colts make a trade for Kirk Cousins? The top comment on the article sums it up best: “Yes they could!”
This column was published on March 10, 2022. It’s still there, you can read it if you want. On March 13, Kirk Cousins extended his existing contract with the Minnesota Vikings through 2023. Hmm, he did exactly what Florio supposed he wouldn’t do, nor should he have done, in Mike’s opinion. There was no inside information contained in Florio’s March 10 column. There was no hidden detail or concealed truth within the Vikings organization that would have pointed to a willingness to re-up with Cousins, nor was there a dissenting opinion within the team that may have indicated otherwise. A similar column with similar results appears in Playmakers, specifically pertaining to the upcoming breakup between Aaron Rodgers and the Packers, slated to happen on the book’s publication date according to Florio. Rodgers has since signed a four-year contract with Green Bay, and he is on the best terms he has been in many years with the Packers organization. Florio doesn’t have sources, he has himself, and that’s it.
Now there’s nothing wrong with that! You’re allowed to have opinions about football, and you can write about them on the Internet. Just don’t think there’s anything more to those opinions, because that’s all they are. They’re just opinions, suppositions, musings, you might say. Accordingly, that’s all Playmakers is: Opinions interwoven with Wikipedia articles about recent events in the NFL. Each ‘chapter’ is two to three pages long, tops, and chapters themselves are organized into subcategories like “Quarterbacks” and “Coaches”. I haven’t been a PFT reader for very long, but the urge I kept getting while reading was to log on and check the ProFootballTalk archives to see if these ‘chapters’ had been published before in years past on the site, and for some of the chapters that covered older historical material, it felt like Florio asked himself “What if I had my site during the days when Mike Tice coached the Vikings, what would I have said in a column about them then?” And then he wrote exactly that.
What would really improve this book in my view is if some of the many maybes and perhapses Florio serves up could be defined in some way. I find myself yearning for a solid yes or no when faced with the inter-league drama that Florio recalls. In the Coaches section, Florio brings up how the Buccaneers traded for Jon Gruden. Trades involving coaches are exceedingly rare, and Florio speculates on why that is. He wonders if it’s a gentleman’s agreement between clubs or if Roger Goodell is exercising his Commissioner’s authority. Yet there isn’t a resolution to these suggestions; if anything, Florio worsens the uncertainty by stating, “The fact that it happens so rarely and is mentioned so infrequently invites speculation that something deeper is happening.” I’m like the guy in the meme going, “Well? We’re waiting!” It’s obvious something deeper is happening, I purchased the book to get an inkling of this something deeper, but instead the book tells me what I already know: Something deeper is indeed happening, and here’s Mike Florio to remind you of this fact.
This is especially disappointing when encountering chapters that cover litigation, which is where I was expecting Florio’s legal background to truly shine forth. Yet the Rooney Rule chapter was more of the same. Aside from an introductory legal explanation of management rights as they pertain to the rule (which I appreciated), the chapter is henceforth a history of how NFL teams have skirted or dodged the requirements of the Rooney Rule, and what actions the league has taken in subsequent years to prevent such abuses from happening again. With the Brian Flores lawsuit still on the table as of now, I was hoping this chapter would shed some light on what might wind up happening as a result, but all Florio says is that it may take another lawsuit to enact more change, and not even that another lawsuit would enact change, that it may. A Florio column till the end. Even chapters about the future of professional football don’t go into all that much depth and are filled with more maybes and perhapses. I expected this to be the part of the book with the most support after I grasped Florio’s writing style, but even here, entire chapters can be summarized in a sentence. The NFL might expand again, perhaps even as far as London. The NFL should be careful about legalized gambling or the government could get involved. We might see a corrupt official one day. Etcetera. Etcetera. Etcetera.
None of this is to say there isn’t a place for this book. It could serve as a historical primer, specifically catered to new NFL fans, as a way to catch them up on the recent history of the game of professional football and it’s surroundings. This is particularly pertinent to the book’s treatment of tragedy in the NFL. While one could argue why they were included in the book to begin with since no new details were revealed, retellings of the death of Korey Stringer and the severe on-field injuries suffered by Chris Simms don’t have much more to offer than the paraphrasing treatment Florio gives them. What’s ultimately disappointing about Playmakers is, when sportswriters publish a book, it’s often as a way for them to think outside the box their employer places upon them and do something a little different, or sometimes a lot different. Bill Simmons’ Book of Basketball is a perfect example. Back then, Simmons wrote for ESPN’s Page 2, cranking out up to three columns a week about the latest sporting news and events. Topics ranged from the NFL to the NBA to individual athletes and the occasional mailbag column, in which Simmons answered directly to his reading audience. The Book of Basketball was an opportunity for Simmons to concentrate his, at the time, boundless writing energy on the sport he loves most, addressing every individual detail of professional basketball in exhaustive fashion. While in some cases similar to his usual work in the sense that writing by the same person tends to be, it was ultimately a creative divergence for Simmons, and one that produced an exceptional result. It doesn’t have to be done this way either, Ian O’Connor of ESPN has penned biographies of Bill Belichick and Derek Jeter, while Mike Lupica of the New York Daily News has written several sports-centric works of fiction for both adults and children. These efforts were fundamentally and creatively different from their everyday work, even if they weren’t universally praised or well-received.
Mike Florio had the opportunity to do something different with Playmakers. He could have challenged the box he writes in, instead, he reinforces and insulates the box with airtight doors. Even if it didn’t succeed in the way that other titles have, I purchased this book because I wanted to support Florio in trying something different, and I hoped this would be the result, but it isn’t. From reading ProFootballTalk, you only see Florio from one lens, as that of a person who knows nothing for certain but thinks he knows everything. Playmakers could have become an additional dimension for Mike Florio’s readers, one that contextualized the lens through which Florio views the NFL. Is there a reason for the snark? Why does he sound like he knows all there is to know? What insights does he have? We’ll never know, because unfortunately, Playmakers is a disappointing case of more of the same.