This was an exhaustive, complicated study wherein the author tries to show that Trump is tied in with Russian cash - as well as possibly beholden to one power or another, probably Russia again, because of Kompromat, or compromising information - as well as bringing into government via appointments to administration positions, a number conservative Catholic lawyers who all belong to a shadowy right-wing religious society called Opus Dei - as well as possibly being tied in to numerous shady figures via his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, who is now of course dead.
One clue leads to another revelation, seemingly. The purchase of television sets from an electronics store near Madison Square may have been some sort of favor to a Russian KGB agent - or associate - who owned the store. Although the author simply offers conjectures or assumptions from the major source of his information about this section of the book, a former KGB agent who defected to the West. It is assumed the electronics store owner was with the KGB somehow because he owned a grocery store in his native Odessa, Ukraine. The story of how Russia basically fell to Russian Mafia, and then Russian oligarch, control is recounted - the reader is informed that many of the current oligarchs were once crime figures in the Russian mafia. The electronics store was said to be the go-to electronics store for Russian diplomats and spooks, who would buy the latest home entertainment systems there before returning to Russia. And so because Trump bought TV sets there for the renovated Grand Hyatt Hotel, he was somehow in with Russians in NYC. Well, that may or may not be true - but drawing that conclusion from a purchase of TV sets is circumstantial, rather far-fetched.
The more compelling theory is that Trump following his multiple business bankruptcies, could not obtain credit to stay in business since he was a poor credit risk. Instead he turned to shady sources of financing, and that included Russian mafia figures. The Russian mafia figures by now were oligarchs, but all were tied in with Putin, a former KGB man, and the KGB had previously ¨recruited¨ Trump when Trump visited Russia to obtain permission to build a hotel in Moscow. The hotel was the ¨dangle¨ that the KGB used to entice Trump, possibly fill his head with KGB talking points, regarding objectives of Russia foreign policy with respect to the US, NATO, etc. - and then, when Trump began suffering business difficulties, the Russians saw the ideal opportunity to swoop in and rescue Trump financially, thus binding him more closely to them. This all supposedly happened before the fall of communism in Russia - but Trump was never a left-wing sort of person. So why would he play ball with the KGB? It is true that by the time Trump was on the ropes financially, Gorbachev was trying to reform Russian communism and was inviting foreign investments - analogous to the reforms then underway in China with joint ventures etc. So it isn´t that far-fetched that Trump might have seen a hotel in Moscow as his next flashy, spectacular move to grab global attention and push his brand - even into the heart of the communist East. Was playing ball with the KGB - adopting their talking points - part of the deal? The author seems to think Trump adopted certain KGB talking points, because he purchased full-page ads in three prominent US newspapers calling for NATO allies to pay their fair share of costs, and driving a wedge between the US and NATO was an objective of the Russian gov, so it would have been one of the talking points the KGB might have fed into Trump. The author thinks Trump was in fact fed talking points and then regurgitated them in the three ads. It is also possible Trump came to his own conclusions, and perhaps was trying to once again grab headlines by publicizing views that were (and still are) considered outlandish, or anti-establishment. There is no proof of KGB conversations or any sort of KGB contract or deal with Trump, in exchange for the Russian financing of his businesses, presented. The author states that Putin provided $2 billion to Trump at that time, but there is no proof presented. Now that Trump´s financial records are available to the NY attorney general, however, there may be some new information about loans from Russian entities (and if to the tune of multi million or billion dollar loans, there´s no question but that they were in effect payments, perhaps purchases even of a stake in his business). The author draws a number of conclusions from rather flimsy information - the gist of his investigation is that Trump was turned into a Russian asset (or some level of Russian intelligence cooperator) because he needed the money, because no-one else would loan him money to continue his business. Meanwhile, the Russians had already identified Trump as a businessman they could possibly cultivate at some point, even before he started having problems with his businesses. They analyzed his personality and concluded he might be suitable - high-profile, many high-level connections etc. - perhaps even as a replacement for the aging Armand Hammer. However, Hammer was wildly different than Trump; smarter and more tactful. Trump was no replacement for Hammer. But Trump might be useful in other ways at some future time the KGB thought, so says the author. So they kept an eye on him, and when he needed money, they were there to help him. We shall never know if any of this is actually true unless bank records show transfers of large sums of money from Russia probably laundered through Deutsche Bank or Alfa Bank to Trump. Such records if they do exist, have not yet come to light.
There is an extensive section on Epstein - interesting in that it explains how Epstein rose to great wealth, was helped socially by his association with Ghislaine Maxwell, why Maxwell might gravitate to Epstein, etc. It´s all quite interesting and the point of this section of the book is to show that Trump, who was friends with Epstein for a number of years, might have unwittingly been recorded or photographed in compromising situations, such as with underage girls, at Epstein´s island property, or his Upper East side mansion etc. Ms. Maxwell´s father supposedly worked with the KGB, but also helped British and Israeli intelligence. Is it possible that Epstein was selling the compromising information to various intelligence services? Or was it all simply seized by the FBI when Epstein was arrested? Epstein cannot flip and confess because he died in jail - a death that that the author states may not have been suicide. The author reviews the chain of events that led up to the suicide, and it seems there were a lot of odd occurrences that evening, such as the guards not looking in on him every half hour as they were supposed to, and other strange things, such as his body being removed from the premises immediately to a hospital, and the scene of the suicide never being photographed.
There is also the section on Trump´s final year in office - with the election seemingly slipping away from him as covid spread and the economy crashed. At the time the book was written, the Capitol riot had not yet occurred - of course neither had Trump´s second impeachment. The author repeatedly condemns Trump for his incessant lying, ridiculous Tweets, and so forth but does note that he received more votes in 2020 than any other candidate in history except of course Biden.
To conclude: I have always figured Trump probably accepted money at some point from Russia, at least looked the other way when Russian oligarchs laundered money through the purchase of Trump properties. The author claims that Putin re-floated the Trump business empire to the tune of two billion dollars, but offers no proof, other than the fact that Trump was suddenly back in business despite not being able to obtain credit from any US bank. He then went into a business partnership with two Russians who were former Russian Mafia figures, who provided funding for the Trump Soho development. As stated above, I figured Trump made a deal with Russia to get funding once his businesses were kaput in the bankruptcies - but we shall never really know for certain unless there is an audit going back 20 years or so, that could prove that money was transferred to Trump from Putin. If Russia has kompromat on Trump that the KGB either directly obtained when Trump stayed in Russia, or that they may have purchased from Epstein - there is no way of knowing. As for Trump the politician, the author gives him credit for nothing, since he sees Trump as a divisive, bombastic, lying wannabe dictator and that severely negative assessment doesn´t permit allowing that Trump may have actually accomplished some positive things in the four years he served as president, such as advancing criminal justice reform, commuting the sentences of a number of nonviolent offenders who had been sentenced under extremely unjust sentencing guidelines, reforming the VA, and many other initiatives. Rather the many negatives of Trump´s term in office are highlighted: The cronyism, the appointment of unqualified loyalists to fill intelligence spots in the administration, and so forth. The veil of partisan rage because Trump violated so many norms, and effectively tore the country apart, prevents Mr. Unger, as it has prevented many journalists, from objectively considering Trump - the rage blinds these writers to anything Trump may have done that was actually positive. The author says the election of Trump represented the most serious failure of US national security ever - since it put a Russian asset into the office of POTUS. However, we have to believe that Trump really is a Russian asset in order to accept that statement. And we need more proof - more than the purchase of TV sets, or ads in newspapers. That Trump´s campaign coordinated with Russia to win the ´16 election, or at least accepted the help, and didn´t decline or report it - is I think a fact, although the Mueller report said there was no collusion or coordination, it did say there was obstruction of justice. If there was obstruction of justice - there must have been a reason to hide certain things. So that aspect of Trump´s relationship with Russia remains murky and is quite suspicious. I agree with Mr. Unger that Trump ally former US AG Barr no doubt shaped the report so as to make it look that it exonerated Trump´s campaign. However, I think Trump would have won in ´16 even without the Russian ¨help" because people obviously wanted a radical change. The popularity of Sanders and Trump proved that.
Anyway, I would recommend the book to anyone who wishes to read about some new information that may shed some light on the complicated Trump relationship with Russia, along with an interesting narrative on Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine´s once wealthy but finally broke father, and the story of how Epstein got to be so rich, and conjectures about the source of his money etc. This is one of the better of the Trump exposes (although I have not read them all) since it is carefully researched and also compiled new information from the aforementioned ex-KGB agent about how Russian intelligence has operated in the USA, their objectives both before and after the fall of communism in Russia, and so forth. It certainly riveted my attention - more so because it is so topical.
Here are a few quotes from the book:
¨...how deeply Trump was indebted to the Russian Mafia, because he had made a fortune laundering millions of dollars from former Soviets through his real estate.¨
¨Deeply insecure intellectually, highly suggestible, exceedingly susceptible to flattery, Trump was anxious to acquire some real intellectual validation. In that regard, the KGB would be more than happy to humor him."
¨In [Robert] Maxwell´s case, as in Trump´s, money laundering was a major part of the game."
¨In Washington, K Street lobbyists had created a lucrative cottage industry by fashioning ingenious loopholes in legislation that served powerful corporate interests --Big Oil, Big Pharma, and the like.¨
¨In October 2019, Barr told students at Notre Dame Law School....:¨This is not decay,¨ Barr said.... ¨This is organized destruction. Secularists and their allies among the ´progressives´ have marshaled all the forces of mass communications, popular culture, the entertainment industry, and academia in an unremitting assault on religion and traditional values.¨