Heavy on metaphors, light on citations. Much of it reads as a personal memoir of the author and their friends rather than a practical or scientific review.
The anecdotes and ostensibly cutting-edge research based on the author’s current (though unsubstantiated and not peer-reviewed) work is interesting.
The general thesis of the book (besides being a memoir) is that measuring/quantifying “biological age” is a robust way to study outcomes of aging-related clinical trials (and also in the individual). Overall, I find that idea compelling, but due to a lack of citations to the literature in this book, I’m not yet convinced of the precision/accuracy of our current models. Will need to do some follow-up research before delving into this myself. In particular, it’s not clear if any of these “biological age” estimates are actually a reasonable proxy for expected healthspan or, if they are, whether they respond correctly to interventions, i.e., maybe they are “correct” for an average human in the “default” case but decouple from observed healthspan given certain treatments. The reason this is such a big deal is because the proposal is to substitute short-term interventional trials for long-term lifespan trials.
The author promotes calorie restriction diets “independent of obesity”, but concedes that there appears to be a floor as to how much can be cut. At the end of the day, I’m unconvinced that this is any better than direct maintenance at a “healthy” weight, where that weight mostly depends on body composition.
Overall, this is a decent introduction to recent developments on aging. Most of the advice itself is well known and should it change much, but the main thing it opened my eyes to is the notion of quantifying biological age. If you trust the author’s biological age offering (or any other bio-age metric), then you can in principle use this to run some medium- to long-term tests on yourself to evaluate the efficacy of various interventions. I like the idea of this, but I’m not entirely convinced that these metrics are necessarily measuring the correct things in this case. I’ll be watching this space in the future.
EDIT:
Turns out only the first bit really felt autobiographical. Later chapters less so.
Overview of different dieting methods is hodgepodge and feels unguided and sometimes self-contradictory. I’m not aware of any fasting diet studies that demonstrate a benefit over plain old CR, but several claims in this chapter suggest that there’s something magic about fasting diets (without explicitly citing studies or methodologies). Take this section with a grain of salt.
Overall, the book was an interesting overview of the anti-aging options, but it did not go into a ton of technical detail or provide protocols for the suggested n=1 self-testing.
EDIT 2:
Turns out all of the citations live at the very end of the book, but are not linked to the core text itself. This makes it very inconvenient to cross-reference.