What do you think?
Rate this book


297 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1984
And this is another constant highlighted by these [Japanese] gardens: in Japan antiquity does not have its ideal material as stone as in the West, where an object or building is considered ancient only if it is conserved in its substance. Here we are in the universe of wood: what is ancient here is that which perpetuates its design through the continual destruction and renovation of its perishable elements. This holds for gardens as it does for temples, palaces, villas, and pavilions, all of which are in wood, all destroyed many times by the flames of fire, many times covered in mould and rotten or reduced to dust by woodworm, but refashioned piece by piece every time. […]
During the visit to Kyoto’s centuries-old buildings the guide points out how often they take care to replace this or that piece of the construction: the fragility of its parts emphasises all the more the antiquity of the whole. Dynasties, human lives, the fibres of tree-trunks rise and fall, but what lasts is the ideal shape of the building, and it does not matter if every piece of its structural support has been removed and replaced countless times, and the most recent replacements smell of newly-planed wood. In the same way the garden remains the garden designed 500 years ago by a poet-architect, even though every plant follows the course of the seasons, rains, frosts, wind; similarly the lines of a poem are handed down over time while the paper of the pages on which the lines are systematically written disappears into dust.
The fact is that his entire oeuvre, I now realise, consists in forcing the impersonality of our linguistic and cognitive mechanisms to take account of the physicality of the living and mortal subject. Critical discussion of Barthes – which has begun already – will be polarised between the supporters of one Barthes or the other: the one who subordinated everything to a rigorous methodology and the one who had just one sure criterion, namely pleasure (the pleasure of intelligence and the intelligence of pleasure). The truth is that those two Barthes are just one: and in the constant and variously balanced co-presence of these two aspects in Barthes lies the secret behind the fascination his mind exercised on many of us.