I'm frustrated. I picked up this book because I like the concept; I do not think it lives up to its promise that it covers women of all races and ethnicities fairly. Plainly put, it's Euro-centric, just as most history books are, with a nominal respect to Africa and Asia. It also largely ignores LGBTQ people throughout the history--and this is a problem if we are serious about discussing patriarchy. Patriarchy is a system that authorizes men, and specifically cis-hetero men, to be in power, so in order to have a proper perspective over it, sectionalizing women and implying they are the sole victims is no good.
Regarding the selection and description of women featured: let's take, as an example, Wu Zetian, the only female emperor of China. Needless to say, this is huge. But her description is misleading: yes, she was the concubine of Emperor Taizong, but her access to power was made more by her remarriage--to her stepson (who was the next emperor). I wonder why this book ignores this dirty but important part of history?
To be fair, let's take a look of Eleanor of Aquitaine. The book says her first marriage was annulled in 1152 and she remarried two years later--to the best of my knowledge, this is wrong. She remarried very quickly, so hastily without the proper pomp that is appropriate for her, eight weeks after her annulment. Two years later, she became the queen of England because that's when Henry became the king.
When even the part about European history has errors, I guess it's too much to expect accuracy about non-European parts.
I like that this book's focus is the more recent history, although I only skimmed through the majority of the book. (I just don't have the time to double check the accuracy of every information.) I also enjoyed the many beautiful pictures.