“… it is no art (keine Kunst) to say something brief if, like Tacitus, one has something (etwas) to say. Only when one has nothing (nichts) to say, and writes a book anyway, does one upend the truth that from nothing comes nothing: ex nihilo nihil fit. That, Lichtenberg concluded, I call
a service (Verdienst): a result.”
With this work Goehr composed a symbolic opus detailing programmatic material concerning the history and interpretation of an anecdote, itself being an entity, symbolic in nature. These recursive structures reflect the significance of what Wittgenstein called the “puzzle [conundrum] about what we mean by saying that we understand a phrase or symbol”, which, incidentally, was not mentioned by Goehr. Nonetheless, asemicity and nothingness synergised into a conglomerate of wit and vie de Bohème, the relevance of which becomes clear by comparison to the acceptance of Einsteins relativity theory as described by E. Du Perron: “De relativiteitsteorie was menig jong-intellektueel, die zijn gevoelens semi-wetenschappelik zocht te rechtvaardigen, een soort vademecum”. Or by the Polish-Italian author Helena Janeczek: “Le coppie si lasciano o restano insieme per motivi imperscrutabili, magari anche perché lo stesso uomo che così spesso ti esaspera, riesce comunque a farti ridere.” In short, both colour and background (negative colour) have moved dynamically into the kaleidoscopic fabric of thought.