Carl Schmitt, renowned as the ‘Crown Jurist’ of the Third Reich, the architect of the concept of the state of emergency, and primarily, the underminer of liberalism.
Liberalism, touted as an ideology transcending others, is a school of thought where political conflicts find resolution through parliamentary discussions and consensus-building. For Schmitt, this notion is untenable. He posits that politics solely revolves around the concept of enmity, where political identity is defined by its negation. Schmitt argues that unchecked liberalism not only leads to ambiguity regarding our desires but also to a confusion about our fundamental identity. Moreover, liberalism fails to adhere to its own principles, as the sovereign intervenes when necessary, disregarding legal provisions and imposing a state of emergency. Much of Schmitt's criticism of liberalism finds resonance in contemporary right-wing populist movements. By comprehending Schmitt's work better, contemporary liberals can gain insights into the challenges they face.
However, one may question Schmitt's legacy due to his association with Nazism, tarnishing his work permanently with the stain of the Holocaust. Reinhard Mehring’s research presents a nuanced portrait of a troubled individual who, after the Nazi Party's ascent to power, was primarily driven by his intellectual ambitions. Feeling neglected during the Weimar years, he emerged resentful, becoming a fervent supporter of the regime, only to become entangled in Nazi bureaucracy by 1936.
In this context, Schmitt followed the same trajectory of other "revolutionary conservatives," intellectuals embittered by the Treaty of Versailles, eager to dismantle what they saw as a corrupt liberal democracy. Many hoped for advisory roles within the regime, only to realize their futility in the upcoming Führer state. In this regard, Schmitt's narrative aligns with his peers', somewhat excusing his intellectual pursuits during the Weimar era. His work lacks overt National Socialist ideology, with Völkisch and social Darwinist elements of eternal struggle and Lebensraum absent. Schmitt's notorious anti-Semitism primarily manifests as personal attacks rather than forming a part of a coherent Nazi Weltanschauung.
Mehring’s biography is essential for historians seeking a comprehensive understanding of Schmitt. Through impressive archival research, a significant portion of Schmitt's academic life is documented, shedding light on his lectures and impact on his students. However, readers interested solely in Schmitt's intellectual contributions may find this biography a tough read.