Joe Biden is many things to many people: saviour, traitor, fool, political genius, revolutionary, reactionary... to Evan Osnos, he is simply "an accidental area of expertise". Osnos, you see, had at the time of writing this book, through no fault of his own, met and spoken to the now-President now fewer than four times. With that level of unique subject knowledge, rare among modern journalists, it was perhaps inevitable that he'd write a book on the topic.
And yet, as a reader, I found myself wishing that the 'accidental' part of the book's creation were a little less obvious. The questions haunted me throughout the book: why is this guy writing this? Who is he writing it for? I'm not sure there an answer, beyond "for the cash" and "for whomever will offer him cash".
Osnos does know about Biden. He may only have had four interviews with the man, but he's also interviewed many people in his professional and personal orbit. It's clear he's got the facts about Biden more or less straight in his head, and that's admirable, of course. Throughout, he appears informed and in command of his subject matter, and he's able to bring in a number of informative or amusing anecdotes.
But what are we meant to get out of this? Because if you want more than a superficial introduction, you're likely to be disappointed.
There's a lot of ways you can go about political biography. You can be the impartial, objective chronicler, giving all the detailed facts but leaving conclusions to the reader; but not only is this account much too short and cursory for that (it's the kind of biography that will happily skip a decade or two), Osnos also can't quite master that tone. There's an air of snark, or plain bitterness, about a lot of it: he lambasts Trump as "rat poison", flays Congress as a nest of lying "windbags", and repeatedly mocks Biden's longwindedness and lack of refined sophistication. That's OK, you might think: it's entirely valid to approach political journalism from the position of a debunker, with a caustic cynicism. That's politically valid, and it can be fun to read. But Osnos never lets himself go: I don't know if he retains a genuine respect for politics and at least some politicians, or if he's simply afraid to let his feelings be known. Of course, it's not wrong to write about politics as a partisan, and attack some politicians while defending others. But if that's what Osnos is doing, I don't understand it. You can be a true supporter of Biden, or you can attack him from the right, or from the left... but while Osnos is clearly anxious to be known to be a Democrat, his position on Biden himself is ambiguous, neither supporting nor attacking. The result is a rather bland book: not praising its subject nor damning him, yet not appearing really impartial either. And if you're hoping for a complex and nuanced assessment of Joe Biden, psychologically or morally, you're out of luck - Osnos has neither the time nor the interest to provide that. He does, to be fair, try to list the talking points on both sides of the Democratic Party regarding its President - but he doesn't go into them in any detail, or come to his own conclusions. He doesn't really even give any suggestions as to how a conclusion might be reached.
[often it feels rather as though his chief interest is in saying the right thing, without having any conviction about what that might be. He repeatedly mentions the outdated "myths" of Biden's "politics of responsibility", for example, but doesn't actually explain what those myths are, or why he's certain that they're mythical. It's simply that some things (myths) are what Democrats believed in the 1990s, and some (unarguable facts) are what Democrats believe in 2020, and anyone who believes the 1990s things in 2020 is not so much wrong as simply out of date, as though politics and morality were essentially matters of fashion...]
Ultimately, Biden is both a fitting and a frustrating subject for a biography, because of his chameleonic nature. It's clear throughout the book that Biden is a pathological liar - he lies continuously, often so brazenly and absurdly that people are reluctant to call him out on it, and even when there's no apparent advantage to be gained from lying. Osnos points tacitly to some possible reasons for this: his need for attention and praise, the young stammerer's need to keep the talk rolling without pause, the orator's instinct to change his content to match the mood of the crowd. Probably not unrelated to this is Biden's willingness and ability to continually reinvent his "beliefs" to suit the moment. But the fundamental question of Biden remains: is he an amoral, unprincipled huckster who simply tells every crowd what he thinks it wants to hear (albeit usually at much too great a length), or is he a good man plagued by psychological liabilities - or then again, has he changed, so that the callow 29-year-old who became Senator (it seems telling that Osnos isn't even able to present any compelling reason why Biden, some random guy too young to hold office, even wanted to run, let alone how he was possibly able to win) was not the same as the bereaved old man now in the White House?
Osnos tells us enough about the man to make the paradoxes clear, but not enough to resolve them.
This book is clearly pulled together from a series of magazine articles, fluffed out a bit with some other magazine articles Osnos has read (and, for some reason, a Michael Sandel book). It's useful to have it all together, and it mostly holds together, with the edges between articles smoothed out and the gaps partially filled in - though I suspect that some of its weak grasp of time (a tendency to skip forward or back for a tangential anecdote, even to time periods covered by other chapters) derives at least in part from the fact that it was not originally intended as a single, mostly chronological work.
Unfortunately, it reads less like a biography, and more like a series of notes for a biography: some things the author wants to remember to include (the sometimes snarky tone likewise feels a little bit like a writer's notes-to-self). Hopefully perhaps now that Biden is President, and Osnos knows he doesn't have to rush to the presses in case his subject becomes obsolete (it's not clear when exactly the book was written, other than that Biden was already nominee, but not yet President), he may be able to revisit this material and work it into a genuinely insightful (or at least more comprehensive) biography. That might even require a fifth interview!
For now, though, this is a book that's worth reading if you're given a copy - as I was - or if you urgently need to write a school report on Joe Biden and want to get the maximum Biden in the minimum time. It's a bit more insightful and fluent than just reading half a dozen stories on Politico or Fivethirtyeight or wherever. But for most people, there's probably no great need to rush out to buy the book. If you don't care much about Biden, you probably know enough already (he's kind of a big deal now); if you do want to know more about Biden, this book will probably just make clear how much you (and possibly the author) don't yet know. [and if you have a strong opinion either for or against the man, the book is likely to annoy you, while lacking the authority to give you pause].
*in particular, Obama really does not come out of it well. From the insults and demeaning praise, to passing derogatory notes to friends behind Biden's back, to attacking Biden for a non-confrontational rhetoric that Obama himself championed until the moment he was out of office, Obama really comes out of this looking surprisingly, unpleasantly, arrogant...