What do you think?
Rate this book


239 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1950
Our personality itself, which, stupidly, we take to be our most intimate and deepest possession, our sovereign good, is only a thing, and mutable and accidental in comparison with this other most naked ego; since we can think about it, calculate its interests, even lose sight of them a little, it is therefore no more than a secondary psychological divinity that lives in our looking-glass and answers to our name. It belongs to the order of Penates. It is subject to pain, greedy for incense like false gods; and like them, is food for worms. It expands when praised. It does not resist the power of wine, the charm of words, the sorcery of music. It admires itself and through self-admiration becomes docile and easily led. It is lost in the masquerade and yields itself strangely to the anamorphosis of sleep. And further, it is painfully obliged to recognize that it has equals, to admit that it is inferior to some--a bitter and inexplicable experience for it, this.

Indeed there are so many myths in us, and such commonplace ones, that it is almost impossible to segregate completely in our minds anything that is not a myth. One cannot even talk about it without creating a myth, and am I not at the moment making a myth of a myth in order to satisfy the whim of a myth?
What a miracle that caused me to be! O circumstance, Human,
Only chance!
So many other men have not possessed me.
I have found in your structure and in your substance
The hour, the being, the hour of being and the being of the hour!
The coincidence of your memories, of the kind of day it was,
Of the nature of your sleep, of your leisure and of your manias,
I have found
My nourishment in your weaknesses,
My possibilities in your ignorances,
An opportunity in your disgusts…
Now we belong to each other. We are indistinguishable.
This is love!
You are my Mad-One-because-of-me: YOUR IDEA.
(From "Song of the Master Idea", translated by Louise Varèsi)
Paul Valéry leaves us at his death the symbol of a man infinitely sensitive to every phenomenon and for whom every phenomenon is a stimulus capable of provoking an infinite series of thoughts. Of a man who transcends the differential trails of the self and of whom we can say, as William Hazlitt did of Shakespeare, "he is nothing in himself." Of a man whose admirable texts to no exhaust, do not even define, their all-embracing possibilities. Of a man, who in an age that worships the chaotic idols of blood, earth and passion, preferred always the lucid pleasures of thought and the secret adventures of order.