Written with the explicit purpose of accessibility, I’m afraid that is what led to the three star review. The book is simple, clear, and crisp. No words are wasted, and I think it would be difficult to finish without a very solid and basic understanding of Presbyterian church government. Moreover, there are takeaways and encouragements here for *all* Christians regarding the gift of the Church and her officers. In saying these things, when I disagreed with Dr. Waters (which I did on a few things), the nature of the book made the disagreement feel more stark. No nuance, distinctly different accentuating points of focus, or just a complete absence of arguments to the contrary. All by the books design! Which is totally okay. All in all, I guess that means, while a happy Presbyterian I am, I don’t fall into *all* the categories articulated here. There’s great diversity within the Church, even within denominations themselves!
FWIW, my disagreements revolve around the articulated mission of the Church in its fullness, the allowance (or not) of Deaconesses, and an accentuation on Biblical authority with very little (if anything at all!) for the place of historical theology/testimony of Tradition. I’ve read enough of the Reformers to know that what was written here was not copy and pasted from the 16th century - there was diversity, amidst great agreement, then as now.
This is a book worth reading! I hope there are others like it for other traditions within the one Great Tradition.