i read this book for school in order to do a review, if any1 reads it, please lmk how i can improve it 🙏🏽
Synopsis:
This book is putting forward experiences that South Asiab women face that aren’t typically shown in the media, other minorities may face similar experiences, however this book is tailored towards being relatable to brown girls specifically, by detailing real scenarios faced by a variety of brown women throughout their lifetime. These issues are commonly shunned from society but this book brings to light problems deemed as taboo. This book is an eye-opener, bringing forward many hypocrisies which still occur in the present day.
Sociological Ideas:
This book is all about the inequalities South Asian women face, from birth all the way to adulthood, experienced from both society alongside people in the brown community. Kaur wants to show that these inequalities faced are real and not made up, that real people face them on a daily basis. The issues women face are still occurring. Kaur also mentions throughout the book that in order to get rid of the inequalities that still are playing out, more people should raise awareness. This book makes inequalities come to life, and be no longer invisible.
Different stereotypes and labels are brought up, in addition to how inaccurate they are. This book tries to break them down, portraying how harmful they are. For example, a stereotype brought up a few times is how society perceives brown women as lacking independence due to their ‘submissive’ and ‘passive’ nature, which isn’t true for every brown individual. This harmful stereotype, amongst others, creates a false perception of brown women, which could make their self worth deteriorate, a reason why this is explored. This book is creating awareness, to show other South Asians that they aren’t alone, but also to educate people, how in the present day, prejudice still occurs daily.
Family is also stated a lot here, since it’s the main focus in brown households. Your own reputation, plus the rest of your family, is deemed incredibly important within the brown community. This book speaks up on how sometimes your own community can shame you, discouraging people further to speak out and get help. Mental health is deemed as a ‘white people’ problem for most brown people, which is entirely false. This book speaks up about the problems received not just from outsiders, but the people who are related by blood to you.
Additionally, people outside the brown community view brown families in a negative light. They are seen as controlling and restrictive, which can be true in some instances, however this isn't the case a lot, brown families can just be as supportive as other families.
Both genders are briefly mentioned as a whole near the beginning, however this book is solely focused on addressing issues faced by South Asian females. Kaur mentions slightly how males actually play a part of these issues, although men do also face their own issues which Kaur does sympathise with a little.
At the start, Kaur mentions when she refers to brown girls, she’s including trans women and non-binary people. In my opinion, trans women (male to female) might not face the same issues as a cis brown women would, but it’s nice of Kaur to include these individuals, who may feel even more isolated.
As Kaur has had experience being a teacher and a student, she’s seen both sides within the education system. Brown girls are extremely smart students, trailing behind Chinese students, yet no one praises this. South Asians aren’t widely known for their academics as much as East Asians (China, Japan ect) and this book highlights that. Brown girls need more credit! They are seen as the ‘wrong kind of learner’, too timid and not assertive enough. I feel like this is due to pressures at home to excel and the stress behind it all. Brown girls don’t try to present themselves as smart, because they don’t believe in themselves due to doubts clouding their mind. This book shows that brown girls should be more confident plus to not be afraid and underestimate themselves. The education system doesn’t really help much, as some teachers can be seen as judgmental.
A statistic which really stuck out to me was that ‘only a fifth of UK universities are willing to consider decolonising the curriculum’ which is insane. The UK deems themselves as inclusive yet doesn’t want to change its education system to include more people of colour. Brown people, as well as other people of colour, have contributed significant amounts to history and present day yet recognition for them is severely lacking. Plus, this investigation by the Guardian uses the word ‘consider’, meaning nothing major has actually happened to try to diversify the curriculum. Every person deserves to hear and see people who look like them, instead of the same names and faces.
Religion is mentioned and how it can help mental health. Religion can be seen by some people as ‘oppressive’ or ‘hostile’ with ‘strict rules’ which is not the case. The author is Sikh, and states how she’s implemented prayer into her daily routine, plus mentioning how many Sikhs find a specific type of prayer helpful. In Hinduism, a mantra is considered valuable for spiritual awakening. In Islam, praying can be viewed as down time from the world, resting and finding relief by talking to Allah. This disproves stereotypes of religion some people have. In addition to this, Kaur emphasises how religion is not a complete cure for mental health issues, she says it ‘shouldn’t be used as the catch-all…you should still be getting the formal services you need’ implying that religion can only be used as a coping mechanism.
The last chapter is focused on social media and the effects it has. Social media is viewed as negative furthermore Kaur focuses on the positives. People seem to forget how social media is valuable due to the negative side clouding over. Social media can be used to connect people and communities easier; it can help reach more people all over the world. Kaur mentions numerous organisations which have significantly grown and developed by the help of social media and some wouldn’t even exist nor be as big as they are now without the help of social media. Social media can be a dangerous place, filled with all sorts of terrifying threats made by anonymous people, however the benefits of social media shouldn’t be overshadowed by the horrible downsides.
Other types of media are mentioned all through the book, such as television. Kaur mentions the lack of diversity seen on TV screens growing up and advocates for more South Asian women to enter these spaces, including the arts.
The media can be discriminatory, an example was when the first women of Indian descent won Miss America in 2014, front-page headlines were asking if Miss America was ‘too dark to be Miss India’ the next day, which is awful. Kaur is trying to advocate for more diversity in the media so that young brown girls don’t feel the same way she did growing up, alone and alienated. She wants the future to change so that the next generation don’t suffer and by writing this book, she’s opening up the floor to controversies ordinary people dismiss.
Interesting Quote:
‘Meritocracy is a myth.’
Meritocracy means a society which is run by people based on their education levels (merit/qualifications). Myth means a belief which is widely recognised but false, or a traditional story. This quote is implying that society isn’t led by people chosen by their skills, more on their connections amongst other factors. However I wonder if it is really a myth. It shouldn’t be a myth however some evidence could prove otherwise. In my opinion it isn’t a myth, it’s more so less used, out of all the ways to choose someone as a leader - the factor of merit is at the bottom of the scale, maybe nepotism is higher than expected. This means that people are more biased, as meritocracy should mean people are judged fairly.
Questions:
-> Why refer to the discrimination as ‘paper cuts’, as surely different types can hurt more/less?
-> How did the idea of interviewing people come to mind when wanting to write this book?
-> What type of questions did you ask the people you were interviewing?
Limitations/Critiques:
-> Mentions how she likes the teaching method ‘think, pair share’ yet fails to mention the negatives of it - From a student’s point of view (who’s the target of this idea), students don’t typically like this concept as they’re forced to talk to someone whilst they’d rather keep their thoughts to themselves, so to state that people should be doing it in the real world is unrealistic, when people have problems they’d rather talk to people they know rather than a random person they may vaguely know, so trying to use this as an analogy did not work, and was not effective.
-> Uses islamic vocabulary in the wrong context - Lots of south asians are Muslims, as it’s the biggest religion in Pakistan and Bangladesh, so it would make sense to mention religion. It states how ‘the Prophet Muhammad once said that in prayer, he would find rest and relief (Nasai), and there are many duas (a prayer of invocation) in the Quran and Sunnah which deal with alleviating feelings of depression, worry and anxiety.’ The words ‘Nasai’, and ‘Sunnah’ are misused here. Sunnah is a word used to describe the actions that the Prophet Muhammed PBUH would do. As the Prophet PHUB is a role model in Islam, his actions are seen as rewardful, but not compulsory, so a lot of Muslims would try to follow how he acts. Sunnah is not the same as something which is an obligation like praying. Therefore, in the quote, the word ‘sunnah’ is used incorrectly. I’m not sure how rest and relief mean Nasai, Nasai in Arabic means worthy of praise. Kaur doesn’t provide a source for this statement. She is Sikh, so more research would’ve been helpful.
-> Relying too much on quotes - Kaur interviews numerous people from different aspects of society in order to have a deeper understanding whilst writing this book and seek knowledge in experiences she hasn’t gone through herself. However, sometimes the quotes aren’t used effectively, it’s mentioned in the book then the subject moves on. Using many quotes at once just to state a simple point isn’t really relevant, I feel like quotes should be taken from people to gain a specific message or information, a message which isn’t common. Using quotes to put words on the page isn’t effective, I feel like Kaur could’ve used her own words more instead of relying on other peoples quotes.
-> Interchanges ‘Muslims’ with ‘South Asians’ - Kaur writes ‘data from the Office for National Statistics' Labour Force Survey suggests that Muslim women are up to 65 per cent less likely to be employed than white Christian women of the same age and qualifications. […] It's clearly not because brown women are not hard-working. Our accolades prove that." Her statistic is about Muslim women, not brown women. Muslim women are not interchangeable with South Asian women, as not all Muslims are from South Asia, and not every South Asian is Muslim.