Everett Piper, the president of Oklahoma Wesleyan University, is on the front lines of the battle for traditional Christian ideals, values, and morality. I have spent almost two decades in universities and absolutely confirm he is not wrong about what transpires on campuses. Parents spend 18 years inculcating their values and morals in their children and send them to universities that, in a matter of weeks, undo that upbringing, disparaging religious --and many empirical-- truth claims, normalizing debauchery, bacchanals, "sex weeks" and even sex apps (egads, U Oregon; cut its funding!), and engendering socialism and a postmodern nihilism, all of which the parents are paying for, often unaware. The "self-refuting duplicity" demonstrated by students' claims, supported by faculty such as “I can’t tolerate your intolerance;” “I am sure nothing is sure;” “I know nothing can be known;” “It is absolutely true that there are not absolutes” are absurd and need to be unraveled, but at this point in time it is virtually impossible to point to the emperor with no clothes without being pilloried, that is, if anyone bothers to listen, which is dubious.
Piper says that college students should be challenged to grow in maturity and virtue, not be coddled and encouraged to give in to their baser instincts. It never ceases to astonish me when parents disagree with this. Worst of all are the wolves in shepherds' clothing, the religious universities that encourage or accept such behavior. What happened to mission alignment? They're more concerned with ensuring enrollment numbers than preserving their religious identity. Oklahoma Wesleyan proves that it is possible to do both. In fact, people seek out institutions that maintain high standards.
Piper is quite strident. Before paying the bill for any university, he urges parents to ask its president about her/his view of Scripture (only acceptable answer: the inerrant, infallible, authoritative Word of God) and of truth, (self-evident and objective and based in scripture). He has subsequently added questions about marriage (only between a man and woman) and life (determined by God alone).
Piper makes his points clearly and supports them well from his conservative Christian perspective. It is a fact that the USA was founded by people seeking the freedom to follow the dictates of their conscience, yet that, in some religious practitioners' view, is becoming more difficult to do here. They have my sincere sympathy.
For my part, I have a different view of religious scriptures and truth claims, but I am deeply concerned by the ubiquitous promotion by college leadership of abject debauchery and intolerance of divergent thinking and traditional values on college campuses, the imposition of orthodox liberal groupthink, and the postmodern sensibilities that give rise to a post-truth era. Where is the pursuit of that which is virtuous, true, courageous, just, temperate, wise, self-sacrificing, and transcendent? These are universal values, but there are not to be found on most college campuses. The students are otherwise occupied with their own pleasure (lazy river, climbing walls, alcohol fueled parties, etc.) and protecting their self righteous opinions from challenge by empiricism or any other competing claims. Piper is correct that universities (which one wag recently called hedge funds with a library attached) must reassess and realign with their higher purpose, which in some fields is job training, and in the liberal arts is the pursuit of universal values. Turning to conservative Christianity is not going to save them. I wonder what will.