In the second edition of her landmark book Negotiating at an Uneven Table, Phyllis Beck Kritek explores the process of resolving conflicts in situations where unacknowledged inequity influences disputes and their outcomes. Substantially revised and expanded, this new edition will help open minds and balance the negotiation process. Throughout the book, Kritek challenges traditional approaches to dealing with inequities at the negotiation table and offers alternatives for reframing the process.
I really really REALLY hated this book. I developed a drinking game to cope with reading it.
You and a friend each start on a different chapter. Every time you hit 500 points, DRINK! If you hit 500 on a single page, DRINK TWICE!
Thrilling take of Kritek's bravery: 50 points Anecdote treated as fact: 50 points "After school special" to affirm your own self-worth: 75 points Stereotyping: 50 points Admonishment to avoid stereotyping: 25 points (100 point bonus if both in same paragraph) Any uneven piece of furniture (other than the table): 150 points Self-evident conclusion: 25 points Bad poetry: 50 points Bad grammar: 50 points Conclusion with no supporting evidence: 50 points Story considered from only one point of view: 50 points Mention of a Kritek accomplishment: 25 points Patriarchal worldview disguised as feminist thought: 75 points Smug superiority: 25 points Conclusion based only on emotional appeal: 50 points "Dr. Who" reference (you never know!): 100 points Complete waste of a paragraph: 25 points Oh wow Kritek is SO SMART!!!! (And says so herself!): 25 points