For me, the best phrase I can think of to explain the underpinning of this book is ‘a curious case of boundless curiosity’.
I spent the first few chapters of this book a) trying to figure out the genre and b) trying (& probably failing) to become acquainted with all the cultural, traditional, linguistic and folklore references.
I then decided to give up trying so hard and just immerse myself in it, so even if that meant not following up every reference on, yes, Google, I was able to appreciate the way the novel carried itself, as steadfast and dignified as the wonderfully unshrinking heroine, Aisha. I wish that I had even 40% of her stubbornness.
There’s a sprinkle of everything in this novel. A talking cat who in an odd way, reminds me of a beloved family member of mine whose wisdom makes them both stoic and endearing, the unnerving creature of Almassi, an elusive father, a larger-than-life grandmother, a boat made from fish bones, an adventure plot with writing so rich I felt like I was watching not reading, goats (Aisha talking to them made me laugh a bit), an insight into Hadrami culture and fables, awkward Hassan dropping his eggs everywhere, a detached shadow, riddles, and most of all, reading a character arc of learning how to both stay true to one’s yearnings whilst not mercilessly stamping on the hearts of others. It is a coming-of-age tale, but it also felt unfinished in a way that reflects the idea that you never really stop coming-of-age as you navigate every new phase of your life.
Whilst the book was steeped in magical realism, there was also a great deal of social commentary woven into the story that stood out for me. The fiery dialogue between Hababa and Aisha, on the topic of marriage and the gulf in understanding between them, quite literally broke my heart in two “Do you think it’s wrong for women to marry? Do you think you’re better than us?” and in response, “I won’t dismiss your destiny in order to trust in mine… because you have chosen him over me!”.
The following extract was equally provoking, on the obsession of ethnic claims and how strongly that ties in to pride and belonging. I wonder, do the older generations ever stop and think the impact this has on not just their younger family members, but also on themselves?
"Mombasa blood, the Uswahili that Hababa claimed wasn’t really Swahili, because wasn’t her father an Arab? Her father’s father was an Arab, all the fathers before, Arabs. But who, Aisha had often wondered, was Shida’s father? And what of all the non-Arab mothers in that long line of so-called Arab fathers whose names no one clutched to remember, because it was better to be who your father was, to be Arab? The Swahili was in Aisha’s blood, in her mouth, on her face. Not something that could be denied or waved away.”
The following passage spoke volumes about the state of modernity:
"…to turn living into transaction, a business of debts one cannot escape from. Do you want to escape? Adam’s folk these days read and memorise and graze beneath a roof called God, like bleating sheep. Is one a believer in inheriting the true faith like a brass pot? Do you not think for yourself how to be improved by it and to improve it? Being is to be alive, awake – to believe, not to roll under the world as it is. If you do not go to war with yourself … at the end of all worlds, will you show how neat your miserly kept book of sums? Or will you have had the courage and say I did deeds good and bad, I disagreed with the world around me. I was awake and I believed, and I doubted, but I was not immobilised. I was alive.”
I found the character of ‘the other Aisha’ an interesting arc; was she meant to be an example Aisha in another life, were they opposites to highlight their contrasts or, as their relationship developed a bit, they became two sides of the same coin? “It was sweet. She did not hate this thoughtless kindness. She did not flinch." It was interesting to reflect on that.
In sum, it’s a rich, stunning, thought-provoking novel which I will dip into every now and again.
The only issue I had with the novel was the ending – whilst it was heart-warming and exciting, it did also feel somewhat feel like a loose end. I was eager to see Aisha find the House of Rust. I don’t know if the point was to keep it open ended for another instalment, or if I missed the memo and the House of Rust is actually some greater metaphor, but based on how I interpreted it at least, it did feel like it was some sort of tangible ‘place’ or ‘state’, and it would have felt more wholesome if even if we didn’t see Aisha explore it, at least ‘arrive’ at it.
Finally, I always make a point of reading the acknowledgments before I read a book. I like to start a book knowing a bit about the author’s mind, and for this one, I found it endearing that this began as a self-project, for the author’s own musings and then it evolved into such a novel. This book doesn’t just feel authentic, it is, and it’s a rarity to come across amidst the current endless churning out of fiction. This book is both a return to form and a poetic and unique take on how deeply fiction can make you feel.
"As a young boy, I used to hear them say: keep your heart open, but the heart of your heart closed. Do you understand? It's deeper than anatomy, deeper than body ... deep in your heart - beneath the sea, beneath the lantern-eyed, many toothed things, beneath the flying feathered fish and the many-eyed serpents ... even the bed of that ocean - there is another heart, and in that other heart, there is another name ... a buried thing that cannot be killed, for to strike at it would be to rupture a wound beyond all wounds."