I read this book because it described, in some detail, what my father had undergone as an RAF bomber pilot in the earliest years of the war.
I was pleased by the level of description, and by the accuracy of certain events taken from reality. But some of the characters were depicted as dark and nasty, which (for some unknown reason) bothered me. I'm not saying that the author was incorrect in his creation of same, just that it was jarring to think of, especially in the context of my late father's proximity to the story (down to the same aircraft he piloted, and some of the actual missions he flew).
One hopes and expects that the heroes of World War 2 were all good, decent and nice. I know, through the research for my own non-fiction book about those events, that this is not actually true. For example, I learned of one well-known POW tunneller who organized frequent poker games, and tried to collect on chocolate bar and cigarette debts after the war.
Suffice to say that I enjoyed the book, and thought it well-written, but the issue about the occasional nastiness of characters soured me a wee bit. Having said that, this author's 'Piece of Cake' is considered a masterpiece of Battle of Britain literature. I wish I could say that about 'Damned Good Show', but felt that, like many of the RAF's early bombing missions, it fell just a tad short of its target.