So, I despise this series more than any other book series in the world. I will briefly touch on this particular installment, and then proceed with my rant about the series as a whole.
The author tried to limit herself to a murder mystery. There was a lot of attention given to "Crowbones," a folklore figure amongst the supernatural, elemental-based lifeforms all loosely referred to as "The Others." One human dressed as this figure and was immediately killed. There were then a series of other murders around "The Jumble," the hotel that is more or less the focal point of this novel. Both humans and Crows were killed over the course of this novel.
As a mystery, it was dissatisfying. Very early in the story we learned that there were two characters conducting "experiments," and they considered each other rivals. There was some indication that they were supernatural themselves, or possessed a superpower of some kind, but this was never explained or followed up on. We were also given short interludes from the perspective of nameless Others in the woods who were trying to leave clues for the law enforcement authorities. So, the identities of the main villains were actually made clear very early on. After that, there were reveals about which characters were functioning as pawns. (Spoiler alert: There were a LOT of pawns.)
It tries to be an old-fashioned murder mystery not unlike an Agatha Christie novel, except with all these supernatural characters. This is the 8th book in this universe, so by now readers are well aware that there are shifter characters who turn into specific animals, and this author's take on vampires are called "sanguinati." They're all elemental supernatural creatures, even if they don't seem like it. And there are more obviously elemental characters who embody Fire, Water, Winter, Fog, etc. The last novel in this series had a MASSIVE cast, with many of the characters receiving no serious time or attention. So, maybe that's why in this novel, the author tried to limit this story somewhat. Halfway through the novel she arranges for all roads to be closed off, isolating a specific number of characters to be suspects.
... Of course, that list of suspects was still at least 14 people.
Now, as for this series as a whole? It is offensive. The author thinks she did something smart by creating a fictional universe in which Mother Nature fights back against pollution. And she cultivated a fan base of readers who enjoy the fact that naughty humans get dismembered regularly for even the smallest infraction against The Others.
But, this universe doesn't make any sense.
In previous novels, we learned that The Others rule this world with an iron fist, to the point that humanity is basically enslaved to them. Humans have to pay taxes on water, and the Others own all land and simply lease it to humans when they deem fit. The Others are allowed to murder and eat humans with impunity, for some reason. So, a few novels ago the Others got pissed off that a xenophobic group of human rebels dared to fight back, and they wiped out a huge fraction of humanity from the planet. In this novel they refer to the event as the "Great Predation."
Other reviewers have rightly pointed out that the author doesn't seem to have any grasp how impossible the technology of this world is. She doesn't seem to understand the level of industry required for the cell phones, televisions, and internet that characters in this universe continue to enjoy, despite the Great Predation. This novel makes one reference to how now magazines are published quarterly instead of monthly, due to the calamity that wiped out most of humanity. Still, characters call each other on their cell phones and look up information on the internet without any particular difficulty. The author refers to how The Others destroy telephone lines that extend across territories, limiting humans to local phone calls. (No explanation is provided for this other than simple cruelty, I guess.)
The author doesn't seem to understand that all of this would require MASSIVE industry. Metallic ores would need to be mined, refined, smelted, and shipped overseas. Factories would need to take the refined metals and rework them into computer chips and logic boards. Fossil fuels would need to be mined and refined into plastic (not to mention into the fuel for all those ships and trains), then shaped into the bodies of cell phones and computers. A lot of the raw metals needed wouldn't be found in the U.S. and would need to be shipped from Russia or African nations. But, none of that is supposed to be possible in this universe, because The Others rarely allow humans to travel overseas or between countries. They are willing to kill humans for even the slightest bit of pollution, so it is difficult to accept that humans were somehow still able to create mines and factories that collect and pollute fossil fuels. Also mind-boggling that the internet exists, and a level of industry that can create computers, but for some reason humans haven't banded together to invent nukes and destroy their supernatural overlords once and for all.
Because this world is Hell. There's no other way around it.
The author appeals to a very particular kind of dumb reader. We're supposed to be happy about the fact humans live in fear, presumably because we're supposed to identify with this novel's protagonist, Vickie, as somehow a "good" human. I mean, The Others have wiped out entire countries of humans, killing every man, woman, and child. There are multiple references in this series to "ghost towns" left after such purges. But, sure. We're going to believe that Vickie is one of very few humans who is good, or innocent, from the perspective of our bloodthirsty overlords. And we're supposed to be... happy...? Reading about the subjugation of humanity?
To be clear, The Others have slaughtered several thousand, if not several million, children. But the earlier books in this series tried to convince us that The Others somehow love children, or at least go out of their way to defend children when they happen to be around them. It's all just a lot of hypocritical theater, though. If you are a 6-year-old human child who happens to be standing near some of The Others, you're precious! If you're one of several thousand children living in cities marked for death, you're shit out of luck.
So, apparently the children's lives didn't really matter all that much.
Also, Vickie is a terrible protagonist. All we know about her is that she is short, overweight, suffers from panic attacks, and her ex-husband cheated on her and was verbally abusive. We know nothing about her academic interests, and she displays no particular skills or combat ability. She appears to have accidentally landed upon the one way humans can survive and befriend The Others-- come across as a friendly, non-threatening female. Meg did that in the original 5 books of this series, and now that's what Vickie is doing. Meanwhile, she displays confounding stupidity. In a previous novel, Vickie received a blood transfusion from a detective. Here, she thinks to herself that she absorbed personality traits from the detective by virtue of the blood transfusion. She seriously worries about what other personality traits she might get from a second transfusion. When she receives a second transfusion after all, she asks aloud whether she got any tattoos from the transfusion.
She appears to be seriously asking the question. I don't think she was joking.
Also, why are Vickie's chapters in first person, while all other chapters are in third person? When students in my creative writing class pulled shit like this, I had to explain to them that you can't hear other characters' thoughts when the book is in first person, unless your protagonist is telepathic. ... Here, it seems to be more of an intentional choice, but it's a dumb choice. Vickie isn't that interesting or admirable a protagonist. I do NOT identify with her, even if I'm supposed to. If nothing else, I understand how blood transfusions work.
My complaint throughout this whole series is primarily-- WHY? Why in God's name do The Others have agency, but they face no moral responsibility for their choices? The author keeps acting like it is somehow so obvious. Her fans try to defend her logic, even though it's illogical. They try to argue that humans can no more blame The Others for their actions than blame a tree branch for falling on a hiker, or a wildfire claiming a cottage.
... Except, in this universe, Tornado and Fire are actual, literal characters. They carry on conversations. They explain their thought process behind why they CHOOSE to kill humans. The author did the impossible and actually managed to make deaths from a hurricane an actual crime of malice. But, then, the elemental beings who perpetrate the crimes never face any consequences for their actions. And they're really fucking smug about it.
The Others have no depth, no morality. They kill constantly, but without any repercussions (legal or otherwise), and without even admitting that perhaps they should. Every book we see the same formula play out over and over again, where some "bad" humans kill some of The Others (often Crow shifters, because they're some of the least fierce species among The Others), and then those bad humans are inevitably slaughtered by the end of the novel. The Others act all affronted and horrified that humans would dare to harm any of them. The Others have this perpetual victim ideology, as if they can't grasp the concept that they have literally enslaved all of humanity and own the dirt upon which humans tread.
Newsflash: You are not the victims. You are our evil overlords.
Sometimes when I explain this series to people I say it's like someone did a psychology experiment. They're trying to figure out how many people are willing to betray the human race just because a sexy werewolf told them to?
It's also weird that the author made the choice to create only ONE group of rebels who dare to fight against The Others. It fits with the story she's trying to tell (humans = bad), but it isn't terribly realistic. There are no altruistic rebels in this universe. There's only the "Humans First and Last Movement." This group is written as xenophobic and hateful, even though they are the only freedom fighters humanity has. There are no splinter groups, or unrelated groups, just fighting for the proposition that the superpowered monsters who wiped out 75% of the planet's children deserve to pay.
Like, what the fuck, bitch? You hold human children responsible for the planet's pollution?
Very small note: The author repeatedly referred to "the EMTs" as an amorphous group of people of unknown number without individual names or characteristics. Setting aside that odd choice, which came up a lot, the author also doesn't seem to understand the difference between an EMT and a paramedic. She referred to EMTs suturing wounds and doing all sorts of other things that typically only a doctor could do, or at least only a paramedic could. I am a licensed EMT, so I rolled my eyes at this, wondering if she understands that after I take your vitals and medical history, all I can do is strap you to a board and give you fucking Tylenol. I would love to suture wounds. But, that isn't a thing that EMTs do.
Also, she indulged the idea that recently arrested people "only get one phone call." This isn't true. It's just a trope in fiction that non-lawyers like to believe is true.