What do you think?
Rate this book


303 pages, Hardcover
First published June 29, 2004
...I used to go around my neighborhood cleaning cars for pocket money. Sometimes you'd get a really muddy mess. Even then I never really had the staying power. I'd clean the parts you could see, but that was it. I was a surface man. I noticed after a while that I knocked only on the houses that had relatively new cars on the drive, because it was so easy to make them sparkle. Of course, this isn't a good target customer for a car washer. (120)To me, this is fairly representative of the approach to writing the book. It feels as though he didn't get quite enough material on Smither, and instead of going back and really digging deeper, he stuffed in some filler for extra length. What do cryonics have to do with crime scenes? Or the ongoing story of 'the man in the bath', which Emmins returns to throughout the book—don't get me wrong, I love the idea of following one case through from start to finish. But...it's really willy-nilly. An entire chapter is devoted to a court transcript of the testimony of a journalist. Why the journalist? Why not, say, the man accused of murder? Or the people who actually investigated the crime scene? It ends up feeling as though this was what he could get without too much trouble, so this was what he stuck in.
For me, the news should be without interpretation—no, strike that, it hasto be without interpretation. What is needed is a factual rundown of the day's key events.... Commentary is great, but it is not fact; it's opinion and therefore should be part of another format. (171)Sure. I'm on board with that. But it feels a little weird to see that coming from a journalist—a journalist writing a work of nonfiction (which, granted, is different than writing the news)—a journalist writing a work of nonfiction that is chock full of interpretation and commentary and opinion (and existential angst, come to that).