I have really mixed feelings about this book, perhaps because it caused such mixed feelings about my life. I bought the book after stumbling upon the author's article, "She Divorced Me Because I Left Dishes By the Kitchen Sink." I have been on the other side of the dish argument for decades, now, and, impressed that he had given the matter enough thought to begin to see the problem, I was interested in what else he had to say.
The author, Matthew Fray, did a lot of soul searching after his divorce, and I'm sure he, his son, his ex-wife, and any future partners will benefit tremendously from that honesty and difficult emotional work. Fray has made tremendous progress in understanding many aspects of interpersonal dynamics that occur within long-term, committed relationships, but, despite coming incredibly close, I think he's still missing the most fundamental piece.
First, I have to say that seeing my understanding of my own situation laid out and acknowledged as valid by a man was shocking. To have the "Invalidation Triple Threat" described as an actual thing, with real consequences, made me feel less crazy. To hear him acknowledge, on page 210, that, "Male behavior is mostly responsible for the divorce crisis; thus, men are the key to solving it," was beyond refreshing. Fray points out that childcare falls disproportionately on wives, that putting your wife in the position of doing things for you that she also does for your children is NOT an aphrodisiac, and that needing to have your wife delegate basic, everyday "unseen" tasks to you in order for you to do them is not "sharing the load." Fray even comes to realize that, while, “There were almost no decisions my wife would make throughout the course of a day that didn’t take into account how those decisions would affect me or our son,” (p. 91) it was also true that, “I frequently made decisions in which my wife was not a factor in the math equation my brain used to decide something,” and, “It didn’t occur to me to ask my wife how she might feel about it or to spend any time considering it.” (p. 60) Clearly, this guy has figured some things out.
At the same time, despite mentioning the intrinsic value of individuals as a reason to respect their desires and try to understand their feelings, Fray still talks about the dishes by the kitchen sink as a "preference." He has lots of reasons why he likes to leave his glass there, but, since becoming enlightened, he now understands and respects his ex-wife's "preference" for maintaining an area she has cleaned and keeping it clutter-free. On page 55, he says about the dishes by the sink, "I could have avoided leaving evidence that I would always choose my feelings and preferences over hers." To me, this implies that his view hasn't really changed. If his wife professed not to care about the dishes, he would still leave them there; picking up is still just to appease her "preferences," and he's only doing it because he now appreciates that respecting her preferences (or at least appearing to) will keep him out of trouble.
Fray cited Eve Rodsky's book, Fair Play, to discuss the ideas of “The Mental Load,” “The Second Shift,” and “Emotional Labor,” but I think he may have missed what was, to me, the fundamental point of her book, which is the idea that, “All time is created equal.” As Rodsky theoretically explains to her husband on page 81, “Hey, we both have 24 hours in a day. The hours of my life are as valuable as yours and we both get to make choices about how we use or finite time.” When someone literally walks away from basic self care/maintenance/responsibility tasks, leaving dishes by the sink, jeans on the nightstand, or trash anywhere but a wastebasket, they are saying that completing that task isn’t worth their time. What, exactly does that imply about the value of the person whose time is spent picking up after not only themselves, but also after you and everyone else in the family? And what does it mean to deny them the choice of whether or not to to spend their time in that manner? People who “can't be bothered” by the trivial, meaningless tasks associated with cleaning up after themselves are essentially saying that they are “better than” those who will eventually do it for them. When you leave your dishes by the sink, and model that behavior for your children, you are saying that she is the least valuable person in the household. That’s why the dishes are important.
So, while I enjoyed this book and think it is completely worthwhile reading for men and women, I hesitate to hand it off to my husband because I think the missing points about time and value are fundamental to the discussion. Additionally, the book is repetitive and the salient points could have been made in a much shorter book. I’m not sure he has the patience to be told the same thing multiple times; he values his time too much. Finally, the “let it all hang out” tone and vocabulary wasn’t a great fit for me. Perhaps better for the male audience?