As Canada was in the grips of the worst pandemic in a century, Canadian media struggled to tell the story. Newsrooms, already run on threadbare budgets, struggled to make broader connections that could allow their audience to better understand what was really happening, and why. Politicians and public health officials were mostly given the benefit of the doubt that what they said was true and that they acted in good faith.
This book documents each month of the first year of the pandemic and examines the issues that emerged, from racialized workers to residential care to policing. It demonstrates how politicians and uncritical media shaped the popular understanding of these issues and helped to justify the maintenance of a status quo that created the worst ravages of the crisis. Spin Doctors argues alternative ways in which Canadians should understand the big themes of the crisis and create the necessary knowledge to demand large-scale change.
Has every day during the pandemic felt like groundhog day? Does it feel like, despite high rates of vaccination in Canada, we're in an endless cycle where things don't seem that much better? In "Spin Doctors", a thoroughly researched book, Nora Loreto clearly articulates why you may feel this way.
By highlighting the multitude of ways in which politicians and media organizations failed the public during the pandemic, Loreto clearly illustrates how racism, ableism, colonialism, and sexism ensured that the pandemic's effects were not felt equally by all, and how nearly no measures were taken to address such inequities or to protect the most vulnerable. She shows how the emphasis by politicians and media on individual responsibility allowed those in power to absolve themselves of responsibility for mass death.
And through it all, she shows the many ways that they could have, and still could, make the lives of our communities better and safer.
Impressive research and great analysis. Wasn't easy or fun to read, as it was so densely packed with facts and quotes, but hard to disagree with any of Nora's conclusions.
The arguments in this book are sound but I can't remember the last time a read book in more desperate need of a copy editor. It's not the typos, either, it's structure, run-on sentences, and redundancies. The book is structured where each chapter is a month, sort of like in Desmond Cole's book, The Skin We're In, but unlike in that book, covering the pandemic by month where each month is a different topical slant (racism, ablism, defunding of journalism) doesn't really work because those topics don't neatly confine themselves to months. A typical chapter makes a point outright, then continually provides examples - often to an exhausting degree - and the writing is so weighed down that it feels like shoveling snow. Just brutal.
Here's an example of a sentence: "The media industry had the unique position of being one that had to not only operate firing on full cylinders during pandemic - like food processing or long-term care - it also had the incredible task of explaining the pandemic, too."
Nora Loreto is a very efficient communicator on her podcast but less so on the page. There are some really inspired moments though. An early chapter talks about the connections between the Ontario PC Party and the for-profit long term care industry. The information is eyebrow raising and compelling as hell. The chapter on gender makes a super original and compelling analysis of how male politicians perform masculinity and father-figure posters in different ways. But too often it felt overlong. It's a shame because her points are pretty spot on and I wish more people were exposed to them. Even if it doubled the cost of the book to hire a copy editor, they do great work and are not a corner you should cut lightly (says someone who used to work as a copy editor).
I would give the message a 5 and the writing a 1.5.
Not an easy read, but an important one, for everyone who trusts the government and everyone who doesn't. Nora sums it up well in the conclusion: "Politicians had two options before them for how they would manage the pandemic: they could have oriented policies toward helping people avoid getting COVID-19, or they could have oriented policies toward defending the status quo: helping businesses pull through the pandemic with as little damage as possible and protecting profits at all costs. They enthusiastically chose the latter, and journalists rarely questioned this logic. That status quo assumes economic growth must continue at all costs; workers wages and working conditions should not be too much of a threat to bosses bottom lines; and individuals should be valued based solely on their economic location in society, their racial identity and personal capacity. To protect the status quo, politicians needed to spin the pandemic to make it sound as if they were actually doing everything possible to protect Canadians given the information they had. They clearly were not."
This was a pretty good book on COVID-19 policy in Canada.
I found it quite interesting.
I read this book as human interest, as I found the title particularly intriguing. This is why I picked it up. I can't say I agree with all statements by the author, but I found it an interesting read.
A thorough and insightful re-telling of the first year of the pandemic in Canada with a focus on which stories were told and which were ignored by the media. Despite following the news meticulously I learned so much from this book and it helped me understand the events of 2020 through a much broader lens.
Canadian politicians chose to protect profits over lives. This book is a thorough examination of the impacts of COVID-19 and what the decimation of the journalism profession in this country has cost us.
Prior to reading Spin Doctors I was completely unaware of the (former) Global Public Health Intelligence Network and the history of long term care in Canada. Leto pulls many threads together into a bigger picture.