A few comments about this book:
The author switches point of view, which is normal enough, but I don't think the switching added up to any great revelations. I feel like if the author switches around from one character to another and it serves no other purpose than to just be a convenience for the author, the book will lose me. It didn't in fact lose me. I finished reading but I wasn't particularly in love with any of the book.
The book just doesn't grab you. The first bit of action is when a carriage barrels down on two of the main characters, threatening their lives. After this, the main character begins to feel paranoid about the impending actions of a secret society. Oh my God! What could possibly happen next?!
I wouldn't say I'm seasoned at writing reviews; in fact, I would just say I'm blabbing on about likes and dislikes, so please, read no further. But there a few main plots here, only one of which is wrapped up by the detective.
1. There is the treason.
2. The mystery of the original murder.
3. And then the murder of the chancellor's wife.
The mystery of the treason is simply told to the main character because another character happens to overhear a conversation between his wife and her father. The author does get some emotion out of this but it wasn't a very satisfying way to learn about the one committing treason as he was unwittingly doing it. And then the murder of Author Desmond is discovered by a character we have never met by simply having a psychotically and narrow-minded burst of rage over the fact that his secret society was involved in anything but altruistic endeavors. Perry can certainly describe people. She has a way with words.
On page 208, I liked this description of Farnsworth:
Pitt was aware not only of the strength of will behind the calm, almost bland countenance, but suddenly of an intelligence he had not previously suspected. He realized that until now he had had a certain contempt for Farnsworth, an unconscious assumption that he held the office because of birth, not ability. Farnsworth’s lack of understanding of certain issues, certain characteristics or terms of phrase, he had taken for slowness of mind. It came to him with a jolt that it was far more probably a narrowness of experience. He was one of the vast numbers of people who cannot imagine themselves into a class or gender, least of all emotions, of a different person. That is lack of vision or sensitivity, even compassion, but it is not stupidity.
Perry can certainly describe a person. I don't mean a physical description, but a description of their personality.
My Overall Rating/Recommendation: Pass. It's cleanly written and she describes people well but the unfolding the plot and the way it grips the reader leaves something to be desired.