3 stars is honestly an arbitrary number. At times this book was a 5-star, and at times I wanted to give it up altogether. Needless to say, I suppose it was worth reading in the end.
Here is my short synopsis of this book (from the limits of my own understanding):
Giussani begins at a place of natural theology, and the discourse making up the majority of this book contain strains of thought related to such. It involves an introspective approach to the discovery of the Absolute. He rounds out the book with the claim that divine revelation was absolutely necessary to make sense of the dizzying abyss that results from the human connection with the divine.
Here is my long, opinion-heavy, probably flawed, review of this book:
First of all, Giussani writes longwindedly. He is artful in his interweaving of various personal, historical, and artistic examples of what he is explaining, but as the concepts develop, these examples tend to complicate matters. At times they are indeed helpful, but sometimes they served simply to misdirect my mind for a few minutes during my attempt to make sense of his position.
Apart from writing style, the content is most interesting. Giussani would argue that this is because it relates closely to the meaning of my life. Amidst the meandering sentences of the Italian priest, one finds truths presented in a unique way. Giussani makes the argument that one can discover God by turning inward, noticing our insatiable desires, and directing them toward discovering the meaning of life. This meaning, however, is absolutely impossible to understand by human methods. Thus, many will simply reduce the Absolute to something within the sphere of their own experience; they do so by creating ideologies and various other idols.
The challenge, then, of life, is to live with the understanding that we will never reach the answer to the 'mystery,' as Giussani calls it, but that the search for such a thing constitutes the purpose of life. In fact, Giussani writes, "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst. Contrarily, cursed are those who do not hunger and thirst, who already know, who expect nothing" (p. 126). This is a life of reactivity, that is, of living without asking the deep question at the core of humanity, and instead simply reacting to the things that are right in front of us. A tempting way to live! But ultimately unsatisfying, as any thinker in the great age of human existence would agree.
So, how do we rationalize living for something so unattainable? Divine revelation. Instead of believing that we can reach an understanding of God by our own human attempts, we must depend on Him to reveal Himself to us. This is known as the Incarnation.
As mentioned, my opinion of this book fluctuated quite often as I continued to read. The writing is difficult to understand, not to mention that it is translated from Italian (and there is that certain overly romantic element that comes with this). My pragmatic American brain struggled through some of the more nuanced sections, and I could not help thinking that this book might be much more concise than it was, had it been written in a different style.
That being said, I have some structural concerns as well. It concerns me that Giussani recommends turning inward so much and examining our own thoughts, desires, and notions. There are many things within the human mind (or which can enter the human mind) that can lead down dangerous routes. Yes, God exists within us, and He planted the desire for Him in our very souls, but one needs a deep understanding of Truth in order to successfully sift through their own soul to find the Absolute. Or, perhaps we can just start at the top (God, the Church, Revelation) and establish faith, eventually understanding ourselves a little better in the process.
In addition, as evidenced by the back cover of this work, one could mistake Giussani's words to mean that he advocates for relativism. For context, here is the quote:
"What Monsignor Giussani teaches us is to rise beyond the smallness of our own minds and open ourselves up to the core spiritual experience of what it means to be human. This is a book for all faiths and no faith."
- Rabbi Michael Shevack, speaking at the 1997 United Nations Conference where Christians, Buddhists, and Jews celebrated the spiritual and religious renewal that Luigi Giussani's work has inspired throughout the world
If the book is read with deep understanding (with the Catholic worldview), the explanation of this quote is fundamentally false. Taken with the Catholic worldview, there is no possible way Giussani's work could have inspired religious renewal among other faiths. I do think there may be some explanation, though, as to why his work was interpreted in this way.
Giussani spends the last two chapters hinting at the need for divine revelation, which, of course, is the fact that Jesus entered into human history. It is almost excruciating how close he comes to presenting the Gospel at the perfect moment: "In the proper sense of the word, 'revelation' does not signify the outcome of man's interpretation of reality, human nature in search of its meaning. Rather revelation means a possibly real fact, an historical event, which the human person may or may not recognize. In fact, neither Judas, nor the majority of those who saw it, recognized it" (p. 143). This is the second to last page of the book, and, alas, he concludes with the idea that God is "Father," again hinting at the "truth that Christ has revealed" (p. 145). All I'm asking for is one more sentence proclaiming that Christ is the revelation, the entrance of the divine into human history that we require! He is the fullness of humanity as well as divinity, and thus bridges the dizzying divide that occurs when a human tries to peer into the Absolute.
In conclusion, Giussani is just a little bit too vague when it comes to Catholicism, and, looking back, this holds true for my personal experiences with the movement he began, Communion and Liberation. That being said, the work is interesting. There are many pieces of wisdom. I am sure it has led some readers closer to the Lord, and that is all I can ask. I would also like to say that, by reviewing this book, I run the risk of claiming that I fully understand it, which would be untrue. I struggled through much of it, and it would probably take at least a couple more reads for me to understand most of Giussani's points. Unfortunately, at this point, I do not think it is worth my time. I gleaned what I gleaned from it, and it was fruitful, but I believe there are better works out there for the time being.