What do you think?
Rate this book
Dating Aphrodite: Modern Adventures in the Ancient World
What's the connection between the Battle of troy and the ANZACS at Gallipoli? Does the latest film of Alexander the Great do him justice? Are you a pagan at heart? Why is there a worldwide revival of interest in the Classics? Slattery talks about big ideas in simple, sensible language. And he takes you to the places where these ideas were born. He shows you the landscape and explains how, even today, the spirit of these places shines through. Slattery is a journalist, culture writer and book critic whose work has appeared in the Australian, the Financial Review, the Age, the (UK) Spectator, the times Literary Supplement and the International Herald tribune. His writing is clear, accessible, evocative and opinionated in the best journalistic tradition.
256 pages, Hardcover
Published January 1, 2005
2 people are currently reading
17 people want to read
About the author
Luke Slattery
5 books12 followersLuke Slattery is a Sydney-based journalist, editor and columnist whose work appears in The Australian, The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian Financial Review. Internationally he has been published at The New Yorker online, the LA Times, the International Herald Tribune, the UK Spectator, and the US Chronicle of Higher Education. Mrs M is his fifth book, and his first novel.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
May 6, 2024
Unexpectedly readable. I am always a little surprised by a literate Australian whose interests ranger wider than footie and local lager. Chasing his other books, which is not as easy as it sounds. Obviously, he is rare, and his readership in the Colonies ever rarer.
January 25, 2021
I found this book in a secondhand shop, in the travel writing section, when I was well in the mood for reading travel narratives. I figured a travel book that also discussed ancient history and mythology would be right up my alley. Unfortunately, the shop and the blurb are both a bit misleading: while Slattery does include some travel as part of the book, this is much more about having adventures in reading and thinking about 'the ancient world' rather than the travel itself. So that was one disappointment.
Overall, I think I mostly enjoyed the book. As that statement suggests, I am ambivalent - was while reading, still am. On the one hand, the cover irks me. It's so ... unnecessary. I assume part of the point is to make the mythology and history seem more real, vibrant, and let's face it alluring, than might otherwise be supposed. But the original sculptor was already all about the male gaze and sexualising the statue; adding the tan lines feels gratuitous. And then there's the fact that half her face is chopped off! There's also the fact that Slattery's whole purpose is to extol the benefits of reading 'the classics' and that access to such things should be available to all (in opposition to the old English-style curriculum where only toffy boys got access to Latin and Ancient Greek). In theory I have no problem with teaching about Stoicism and so on. But the problem starts when you then move further along that line and suggest it's the only history worth knowing. Slattery doesn't do that, but it's a not hard to take his arguments and get to that point. It is, of course, largely male-dominated... unless you're talking about Aphrodite, or throw in a brief reference to Sappho or Penelope.
I did not, though, hate the book. There were some really interesting bits! I liked the discussion of Apollo and Delphi and Pythia and Dionysus - although I feel Slattery missed an opportunity in not discussing the possible origins of Apollo and Dionysus, given Apollo is thought to have originated as an Eastern god, and Dionysus as more solidly home-grown 'Greek' (for all the problems with that word in the ancient world). The chapter about Ithaca was probably my favourite because it conformed most to what I was expecting, and wanting at the time: Slattery on Ithaca itself, and musing on The Odyssey, and the archaeological evidence for Odysseus on Ithaca, and how modern inhabitants feel about it.
I feel that this book probably only works for someone with at least some basic knowledge of Greek myth - although maybe I'm wrong, and Slattery explains things well enough for the complete novice. My knowledge of Stoicism and Epicurean ideas has never been that thorough and he does explain those in a way that I could understand.
As well, the book's only 15 years old but I'm just not sure that it would get published today - in fact I was surprised to see that it came out in 2005, because it felt... older. And I think the lack of women has a lot to do with that. Plus, Slattery makes a case that the ancient Greek world had many things we value today - religious tolerance, being cosmopolitan, what he calls "Homeric impartiality" (the fact Hektor is the greatest hero in The Iliad despite not being Greek, and I am completely unconvinced about this demonstrating impartiality). Therefore, "we" can learn from the classics. I am unconvinced, even after reading the book, that that's true. Partly because of the completely different contexts, and partly for vaguer feelings that this logic just doesn't quite follow.
Overall, I think I mostly enjoyed the book. As that statement suggests, I am ambivalent - was while reading, still am. On the one hand, the cover irks me. It's so ... unnecessary. I assume part of the point is to make the mythology and history seem more real, vibrant, and let's face it alluring, than might otherwise be supposed. But the original sculptor was already all about the male gaze and sexualising the statue; adding the tan lines feels gratuitous. And then there's the fact that half her face is chopped off! There's also the fact that Slattery's whole purpose is to extol the benefits of reading 'the classics' and that access to such things should be available to all (in opposition to the old English-style curriculum where only toffy boys got access to Latin and Ancient Greek). In theory I have no problem with teaching about Stoicism and so on. But the problem starts when you then move further along that line and suggest it's the only history worth knowing. Slattery doesn't do that, but it's a not hard to take his arguments and get to that point. It is, of course, largely male-dominated... unless you're talking about Aphrodite, or throw in a brief reference to Sappho or Penelope.
I did not, though, hate the book. There were some really interesting bits! I liked the discussion of Apollo and Delphi and Pythia and Dionysus - although I feel Slattery missed an opportunity in not discussing the possible origins of Apollo and Dionysus, given Apollo is thought to have originated as an Eastern god, and Dionysus as more solidly home-grown 'Greek' (for all the problems with that word in the ancient world). The chapter about Ithaca was probably my favourite because it conformed most to what I was expecting, and wanting at the time: Slattery on Ithaca itself, and musing on The Odyssey, and the archaeological evidence for Odysseus on Ithaca, and how modern inhabitants feel about it.
I feel that this book probably only works for someone with at least some basic knowledge of Greek myth - although maybe I'm wrong, and Slattery explains things well enough for the complete novice. My knowledge of Stoicism and Epicurean ideas has never been that thorough and he does explain those in a way that I could understand.
As well, the book's only 15 years old but I'm just not sure that it would get published today - in fact I was surprised to see that it came out in 2005, because it felt... older. And I think the lack of women has a lot to do with that. Plus, Slattery makes a case that the ancient Greek world had many things we value today - religious tolerance, being cosmopolitan, what he calls "Homeric impartiality" (the fact Hektor is the greatest hero in The Iliad despite not being Greek, and I am completely unconvinced about this demonstrating impartiality). Therefore, "we" can learn from the classics. I am unconvinced, even after reading the book, that that's true. Partly because of the completely different contexts, and partly for vaguer feelings that this logic just doesn't quite follow.
April 15, 2012
Luke SlatteryDating Aphrodite: Modern Adventures in the Ancient WorldIt helps to understand this book if you have read Homer's great works - The Odyssey and The Iliad. But if you are a raving Philhellene like I am, you will enjoy it just as much.
September 19, 2014
This book is a collection of antiquarian inspired essays. The author goes in search of Troy and finds evidence for the enduring legacy of The Iliad and The Odyssey. There are essays on the nature of love and religious tolerance. The book is an interesting reminder of the reasons for an enduring interest in Greek gods and heroes and seeks to encapsulate the "enchantment of myth".
January 1, 2019
3 Stars = Okay. I liked the book. It was worth reading.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews