I started to read Ask A Historian with the idea that it could replace doomscrolling - that instead of mindlessly scrolling through social media when I had a break, I would read a little answer to an interesting historical question. This means that it is also the first book that I have mostly read on my phone. For this purpose, it is brilliant. I want more. I cut right down on my Twitter use, right as the site imploded.
The basis of the book is that Greg Jenner received hundreds of questions from the public, of which he chose 50 to answer with around 1,300-2,500 words. These are perfect bite-sized chunks, and most of the answers suit that length - it's not about writing a deep scholarly article on the subject, but giving the public an overview. Of the fifty questions, I'd say there are only two where the answer is unsatisfactory: the huge question about the modern boundaries of African nations, which Jenner admits is too big for the format; and the question about why we care so much about the Tudors, which I think focuses too much on why the Tudors were cool rather than the history of the English caring about the Tudors (I also mildly disagree with Jenner on historical inaccuracy in films, but not to the extent that I dislike his answer). But this is nit picking. Many of these answers are things I didn't know, or suspected, and found genuinely fascinating (the origins of different names for the same place in different languages is one example). That so many are focused on how we know what we know is also great, and something I really want to see in more public history. As Jenner argues in his answer to question 18, "history" is not really "the past", it is what historians do, and understanding that process is a big part of widening historical knowledge among the public.
In sum, a satisfying book that kept me away from indulging in one of the worst habits of the modern age. Now I need another one....