I loved most of this book but found the climax and ending frustrating. Both main characters are compelling and I enjoyed watching their relationship slowly develop. But the book has some structural problems that made much of the tension near the end feel cheap instead of earned, and I'm wary about where the relationship is likely headed in book two. That said, I think most people who liked the Big Bad Wolf series will enjoy this despite its flaws, and there’s a lot to look forward to in future installments.
This review contains spoilers, though I've tried to be vague about the actual events of the book.
First, what I liked:
Both characters are excellent and fit together in some unexpected ways. Eli was intriguing in the Big Bad Wolf books, and his POV here is exactly what I was hoping for: there’s a lot going on under the snarky, irreverent surface, but he’s also not a caricature of a person who uses a flippant demeanor as protection due to previous trauma. He’s more than the sum of his character tropes and has a lot of promise that I hope future books in the series fulfill.
Julien also feels very real, especially his complex feelings on grief and his relationship with his brother, and his musings on his previous romantic relationships and how his needs have changed over time. It’s always nice getting a POV character in romance who’s over forty, and Julien feels like he really is that age, not a twenty-five year old with some gray hairs. His reasons for coming to Maudit Falls make sense for his character and the reader wants to see him resolve the mystery of his brother’s death because of what it will mean for him, not just for the narrative satisfaction of finding the answer.
As someone who was frustrated they never got to know Oliver better through POV chapters in the Big Bad Wolf series, I’m glad Adhara chose to make this a dual-POV book. Julien’s POV adds a lot to the story and there are many aspects of his character we’d have missed out on if we weren’t seeing his thoughts, such as the ways he’s affected by his grief. I’m glad we’ll get to watch his character journey in real-time and won’t have to wait until he and Eli know each other well enough to share their most vulnerable thoughts.
I also liked returning to the location of one of the Big Bad Wolf books (more or less) and the way this book built on everything the reader learned in that series without making this book feel like a rehash or overly reliant on that series. This could be read as a standalone if someone were really inclined to do so. It’s difficult to balance old vs. new when writing a spin-off series and Adhara got it right.
Now for the problems:
I strongly suspect this book was originally written solely from Eli’s POV, similar to how the Big Bad Wolf books are all solely from Cooper’s POV. It seems that by the time the decision to add Julien’s POV was made, the main narrative beats had been decided, and many of them relied on Eli not knowing what Julien knew. Unfortunately, rather than simply keeping Eli in the dark, Adhara chose to keep the reader in the dark too, even when Julien’s POV should have revealed many of these facts.
An early example is Julien’s bisexuality. It’s clear from the outset that he’s attracted to Eli, but his POV chapters are written ambiguously, to create a mystery over whether Julien recognizes the attraction or even sees himself as not-straight. Thus, when Eli first comes onto Julien and Julien hesitates, we don’t know Julien’s reasoning and it’s uncertain how he’ll respond to Eli’s advances. It’s only after the scene concludes that we learn Julien is bisexual and simply nervous about his inexperience with men. In this context, it doesn’t make sense for Julien to be so (seemingly) oblivious to his desires except to create suspense for the reader. It would have worked better if the uncertainty came solely from Eli. It wasn't necessary for the book to keep the reader in the dark as much as Eli was.
There’s also at least one scene where Eli catches Julien saying something he thinks Julien isn’t supposed to know and Julien acts like he’s been caught in a lie, even though we’ve seen in a previous chapter that Julien learned the information in a totally innocuous way he could easily have explained to Eli. By the end of the book it’s clear we’re supposed to feel Julien lied and hid things from Eli a lot, even though the Julien POV chapters don’t show this at all. We actually see Julien coming clean about a lot of things relatively early in their relationship (much more so than Eli, ironically). Again, it makes sense for Eli to be distrusting, but it's out of character for Julien not to take very simple steps to provide his side of the story. Eli could still have chosen to be distrusting, but as the book is written, it feels like the reader is supposed to take Julien's duplicity as a fact instead of just Eli's interpretation of things.
These are relatively minor issues I gladly would have overlooked if not for the deployment at 75% of one of the most egregious uses of the “concealing information from the reader that they should have already had” trope I’ve seen in a long time. We learn at this point that Julien had key information the entire time that he never shared with Eli. Yet despite spending half the book in Julien’s head, the reader is blindsided too. It’s like when movies show a character whispering something unintelligible into another character’s ear at a critical moment, except here the reader doesn’t even get a warning they don’t know everything.
The explanation for why this didn’t come up before (offered in Julien’s POV immediately after the reveal) is unconvincing and illogical. We’re told he didn’t really understand what the information meant and was trying not to think about it due to his grief. But the concealed information is relevant to a number of earlier developments and it’s simply not plausible that a character who’s marshaling every resource to solve the mystery of his brother’s death would never once have thought about this information, even if just in confusion about how it all fit together. We even see him thinking about the information’s source more than once!
The biggest problem with how this reveal is handled is that it undermines the emotional heart of the climax and the aftermath. The reveal leads Eli to feel their entire relationship to that point has been built on a lie and that he’s been used and betrayed. At the end of the book he thinks of Julien as someone who “lies like he breathes.”
But the reader has been given a completely different sense of Julien and was never shown this particular lie, only ever the honest intentions he had towards Eli. From Julien’s POV, it appeared that a few minor facts were hidden but all the important facts were revealed relatively early on. The reader knows Julien has some additional information he hasn’t figured out, but all of this is shown as being so uncertain and confusing he has no idea what to do with it, and certainly never acts on it. Nothing in Julien’s POV supports the idea that he’s used or betrayed Eli.
While it makes sense for Eli to be distrusting, Julien acts as though Eli is right to feel he’s been lied to and betrayed—and the book seems to treat the betrayal as a fact instead of just Eli’s opinion. But if Julien truly never thought the information was relevant and never acted on it, then he should be upset by how Eli has totally misunderstood the situation and want to set the record straight. And because he’s been shown to be kind and compassionate throughout the book, he should want to mitigate Eli’s pain by doing everything in his power to resolve the conflict. Instead, he offers a half-hearted explanation that doesn’t get to the heart of Eli’s very obvious concerns, then gives up. He and Eli spend many hours alone together with nothing to do except talk, and Eli is obviously very upset during this time.
It’s very difficult to feel the true depth of Eli’s hurt when it’s based entirely on events the reader never saw and that are contrary to everything the reader was told about Julien’s feelings and intentions. The conflict felt manufactured and unearned, created solely to separate the characters for the start of the next book. But if mistrust and betrayal are going to be critical to how the relationship develops, then the reader needs to really feel those things themselves. The reader needs not only feel the hurt of the betrayed character but also—crucially—the guilt of the betrayer. Here, there’s nothing for Julien to be guilty about, so when I was supposed to feel righteous anger on Eli’s behalf, all I could muster was frustration.
This is the main reason I think the book was originally written solely from Eli’s POV: The sense of betrayal makes complete sense through Eli’s eyes. But with Julien’s POV added in, Eli’s reactions can no longer be taken as fact. Yet it feels as though the reader is supposed to treat them as fact anyway.
This didn’t ruin the book for me, but it came close. Unnecessarily hiding information from the audience to create suspense is one of my biggest pet peeves, especially when the author is talented enough to come up with a different solution, as Adhara surely is. I don’t understand why the conflict couldn’t have been Eli feeling betrayed and Julien feeling angry that Eli has so horribly misjudged him.
Minor Nitpicks
These issues are minor in the grand scheme of things, but stood out to me at the end of the book because I was already feeling frustrated at that point.
I really wish authors would stop doing the thing where male characters always think of other men they meet (even side characters) by last name until they’re familiar enough with the person to “earn” the right to use their first name, but don’t do the same for women, who are referred to by first name from the outset (or sometimes first name last name, but never just last name). It’s really common in a lot of contexts (it comes up a lot in how politicians/political candidates are discussed, for example), to the point that I don’t think people realize they’re doing it. But once you start noticing, it’s distracting, especially because it originates in misogyny.
In romance, I find this naming convention especially annoying in contexts where people in the real world wouldn’t be referring to each other by last name, or if they were, they’d be using the person’s title or salutation also (such as “Agent Park” or “Mr. Doran”). I know it’s meant to show how well the characters know each other, but in many books it feels like an unnatural affectation, and most of the time the familiarity level is already being conveyed in other ways.
To give a specific example, at the end of the book, Eli is talking to Oliver – his close friend and family member – about Julien, his erstwhile friend and lover. Oliver refers to Julien in this conversation as “Doran.” Who in real life would refer to their close friend’s love interest solely by last name in a heartfelt conversation about feelings? It’s bizarre, and makes even less sense between two wolves, when last names in wolf culture are most often used to refer to a collective and not an individual. In a culture that uses last names that way, you wouldn’t default to referring to individuals by last name because it would be confusing. (Similarly, after Cooper and Oliver introduce themselves to him at the end, using both first and last names, Julien thinks of them as Dayton and Park. They’re his friend’s friends! Who does this? I hate it.)
Finally, the most minor nitpick of all: This book is set during winter and at one point a huge snowstorm occurs. Yet snow seems not to exist half the time and is rarely an impediment or even a consideration (who goes on long hikes in the snow without gloves?). People stand outside in the snow for hours and never think once about being cold. It makes me wonder if this was originally set during a different season and rewritten to be winter because snow was needed for a few of the plot points.
I received an ARC in exchange for my review