Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Style of Connectedness: Gravity's Rainbow and Thomas Pynchon

Rate this book
Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow, arguably one of the greatest works of fiction in this century, has often been considered despairing, absurdist, or niilistic.  Now, in a monumental effort to make Pynchon's work more accessible, Thomas Moore surveys all the major, and often confusing, backgrounds in Gravity's Rainbow--from archaic myths to quantum-physical theory; from romantic thought to rocket technology; from seventeenth-century Puritanism, through the ideas of Weber, Jung, and Marhsall McLuhan, to the worlds of Weimar and Hollywood movies--to help Pynchon's reader understand the weird, frightening, funny, lyrical, surreal, and ultimately hopeful cosmos of Pynchon's fictions.

By exploring the novel's internal strategies and its brilliant integrations of background information, Moore illustrates how Gravity's Rainbow remains movingly humane, as its author, the agonized mediator of a bewildering field of cultural information, remains excruciatingly sensitive to every human image and gesture, searching for the chances for love and connection that still hide in the vast designs of things. 

The reader of Moore's work should emerge with a thorough appreciation of Pynchon's unique style of genius, of his optimism, of his intense moralism, and of the justness of the widespread claim that Pynchon is the most brilliant "encyclopedic" writer of fiction since Joyce.

 

 

 

320 pages, Hardcover

First published April 27, 1987

1 person is currently reading
99 people want to read

About the author

Thomas Moore

1 book1 follower
Thomas Moore (b. 1946), instructor with the European Division of the University of Maryland.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (16%)
4 stars
8 (44%)
3 stars
6 (33%)
2 stars
1 (5%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Mark.
8 reviews11 followers
April 21, 2015
I can't believe I forgot to read this back in the mid 1970s.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.