In The First Christmas, Stephen Mitchell brings the Nativity story to vivid life as never before. A narrative that is only sketched out in two Gospels becomes fully realized here with nuanced characters and a setting that reflects the culture of the time. Mitchell has suffused the birth of Jesus with a sense of beauty that will delight and astonish readers.
In this version, we see the world through the eyes of a Whitmanesque ox and a visionary donkey, starry-eyed shepherds and Zen-like wise men, each of them providing a unique perspective on a scene that is, in Western culture, the central symbol for good tidings of great joy. Rather than superimposing later Christian concepts onto the Annunciation and Nativity scenes, he imagines Mary and Joseph experiencing the angelic message as a young Jewish woman and man living in the year 4 bce might have experienced it, with terror, dismay, and ultimate acceptance. In this context, their yes becomes an act of great moral courage.
Readers of every background will be enchanted by this startlingly beautiful reimagining of the Christmas tale.
Stephen Mitchell was educated at Amherst College, the Sorbonne, and Yale University, and de-educated through intensive Zen practice. He is widely known for his ability to make old classics thrillingly new, to step in where many have tried before and to create versions that are definitive for our time. His many books include The Gospel According to Jesus, The Second Book of the Tao, two books of fiction, and a book of poetry.
Mitchell’s Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke has been called “the most beautiful group of poetic translations [the twentieth] century has produced.” William Arrowsmith said that his Sonnets to Orpheus “instantly makes every other rendering obsolete.” His Book of Job has been called “magnificent.” His bestselling Tao Te Ching, Bhagavad Gita, and Gilgamesh—which are not translations from the original text, but rather poetic interpretations that use existing translations into Western languages as their starting point—have also been highly praised by critics, scholars, and common readers. Gilgamesh was Editor’s Choice of The New York Times Book Review, was selected as the Book Sense 2004 Highlight for Poetry, was a finalist for the first annual Quill Award in poetry. His translation of the Iliad was chosen as one of the New Yorker’s favorite books of 2011. He is a two-time winner of the Harold Morton Landon Translation Award from the Academy of American Poets.
His books for young readers include The Wishing Bone, winner of the Lee Bennett Hopkins Poetry Award as the best book of poetry for children published in the United States in 2003, and Jesus: What He Really Said and Did, which was chosen by the American Library Association’s Booklist as one of the top ten religious books for children in 2002.
He is also coauthor of two of his wife Byron Katie’s bestselling books: Loving What Is and A Thousand Names for Joy. www.thework.com
Rounding up to 4 stars. There are seven chapters highlighting characters from the Nativity scene: the innkeeper, the ox, the shepherds, Maryam, Yosef, the Wise men, and the donkey. My most favorite were the ox and the donkey. Mitchell did such a delightful job bringing them to life. I also greatly enjoyed the many Psalms he wove into the stories of the mother and father. The many references to scripture are juxtaposed against instances when the biblical record is disregarded as in the case where the shepherds delayed in the fields overnight. (See Luke 2:16). Also, the Wise Men (that chapter went on way too long) totally skip stopping in Jerusalem as recorded in Matthew 2. Still, this book was instrumental in making me ponder the Christmas story in new ways. Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift! 2 Corinthians 9:15
Thank you to Macmillan Audio and NetGalley for a early review copy in exchange for an honest review.
Always one to enjoy some unique reading during the festive season, I turned to this short piece by Stephen Mitchell. It pulls upon the Nativity story, told in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, and offers a more thorough and first-hand account of some events surrounding that period. While Mitchell explains that these are some of his own thoughts put into dialogue and a well-paced narrative, something resonates in them and it makes sense.
Mitchell captures many angles of the Nativity narrative, from those major players many will know (Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the wise men), as well as some who were surely essential but receive only a mere mention in biblical passages (the ox and donkey). These perspectives weave together not only a well-developed narrative, but provides the reader with some insight as to how each felt about the event, a well as some of the lead up to things that occurred that cold night. It leaves the reader to ponder a little more what they know and surmise about that story that, for many, is so well known.
Between each chapter (and on occasions, within them) Mitchell offers some of his own analysis of events and how they fit into the larger story. This is almost an annotation or extensive footnoting for the reader to better understand why he wrote things a certain way. I was please to have this, feeling it added to the overall experience and left me feeling a bit better if there were parts I did not understand.
While I am no scholar or expert on the subject matter, I count myself as someone who knows the story fairly well. I was eager to see this approach to better understand the story without being made to feel that this was an academic piece or even one that required heard thinking. I do enjoy challenging myself from time to time and will not stop with this piece. I’d love to see if Mitchell (or others) have other pieces like this, where I can explore new perspectives on long-told and remembered stories from my past.
Kudos, Mr. Mitchell, for a great piece that I devoured in a single day. I’ll keep my eyes open for more of your work and see if I cannot latch onto it as well.
I am the handmaid of the Lord, she thought. My soul glorifies Him, and my spirit rejoices in Him, for He has looked on me with favor despite my humble condition. I am at His service, now and always. Let Him use me as He sees fit. (PG 78)
For 2023 Easter I wanted a feel good book on Jesus, didn't matter that it was a Christmas themed book on His birth. I like, wait no, I love the guy. Thinking of his birth and crucifixion and what His love for us looks like makes my heart get all gel-like.
Anyway... This was.... Interesting. It had lots of "facts" that I'm not sure are real or misinterpreted by the author. Lots of Interludes after a chapter explaining Maryam's and Yosef's etc feelings at that moment or the Jewish views of that time and how something doesn't collide with these beliefs.
A couple questionable "facts" are:: 1. Two wise men instead of three 2. Mary and Joseph had 6 children after the birth of Jesus, four brothers & two sisters
I'm not saying the author is wrong, I even tried googling some of these facts and couldn't find anything to yay or nay this information so I just went with the flow.
I always do author digging when I read a book. Stephen Miller is Jewish and I appreciated his thoughts on the Torah for this moment in time. He makes lots of valid points concerning how Yosef and Mary, being Jewish, would have uncertain views about her pregnancy and how it would affect them mentally and socially stigmatize them. This is obviously not described in the Bible. Everyone goes with the flow. I like how Mitchell goes into detail about Yosef. In the Bible he is kind of in the background, forgotten. He obviously means so much to Jesus but Mary is put in the forefront. I always had that question about Joseph. He accepted Mary and did God's will. What a great man! but once he said yes he served his purpose as a human and disappeared where?
It was, overall, a fast interesting read. Even if you're not religious it's still something new or fresh eyes for the believers in Christ. I just felt there were too many pauses in between the story. Too many interludes for my liking. I appreciated the "Notes and References" pages and his scholarly brain.
I like that as a Jewish man he can write write about the moments leading up to the Messiah's birth and talk with beauty about baby Jesus and what it meant for us Christians. He had fun thought-provoking twists like the journey of the wise men and how the angels looked to each person that saw one.
It was cool, like cool, but I think I wanted more of something, something deeper? I don't know but not the author's fault.
It took a village and a deep look within (probably lots of disbelief) everyone to make Jesus. He's the King of Kings. Mike DROP!
Definitely a unique approach to sharing the Nativity story. The author shares in the forward that his intent is to inhabit the characters. Each chapter is shared from the perspective of a person, group or animal that is a part of Jesus' birth. In between each chapter is an Interlude in which the author shares additional insights into his thought process.
I loved the humor that was included especially in the chapters written from an animal's perspective, such as the perspective of the donkey that carried Mary. There is also quite a bit of depth as the author analyzes the reaction and thoughts characters may have had. Our perspective today is quite different than it would have been for those involved. Can you imagine your fiance sharing that she is with child by the Holy Spirit?
Some may find parts to be crude or irreverent, however, I found it overall to be thought provoking and provided a new way to consider everyone involved in the first Christmas.
My gratitude to publisher St. Martin's Press for a complimentary NetGalley copy of the novel. I was not required to post a review and all opinions expressed are my own.
A different take on the Nativity story, told through the eyes of the supporting cast, with no focus on the Messiah.
Each chapter is devoted to one of these members of the cast: the Innkeeper, Joseph, Mary, the Shepherds, the Wise Men, even the Ox in the stable and the Donkey who carried the family to Bethlehem.
The central conflict is the burden and resolution of this virgin birth: Mary who faces being labelled a whore and divorced by her husband, and Joseph for condemning his innocent wife if she had indeed been impregnated by an angel instead of by some furtive lover. The soul-searching by both carries the book.
Some Biblical myths are revised: there were two wise men instead of three, and Jesus’s body was supposedly disposed of in a mass grave along with other crucified corpses. Despite these revisions, the author sticks to the Nativity story and to its message of hope. Fundamental in that message is that the ”Kingdom of God lies within and is not external,” testament to the Jews trapped in endless waiting because they expect the Kingdom to come from the outside.
The two wise men are portrayed as Middle-Easterners who went to India to study and decided to return home when they were beckoned by a pesky star that wouldn’t let up and disappear. A quote from their Indian guru stuck with me: “Wisdom is like soap. You use it to wash the grime. Then you wash off the soap.”
The two most interesting characters are the animals: the Ox and the Donkey, for they are the most intelligent. They narrate their chapters in first person, while the rest are relegated to third person status. The Ox prefers to “chew the cud,” ruminating on the world, convinced that the wild can never be domesticated. The Donkey sees into the future and into the demise of this beautiful baby in the manger; like Balaam’s ass, it also has the last word “You can command a horse, but you have to negotiate with a donkey.”
The most interesting factoid was how I came to read this book that is not yet published. A friend found it in a roadside community library shelf as part of the Book Crossing program that puts out pre-publications into the world in the hope of garnering advance readers. There was even a letter inside from the publisher’s marketing manager hoping that whoever read this book and enjoyed it would write it up favourably on Goodreads. Well, she seems to have got her wish, for I did enjoy it and am writing it up here.
This lovely and interesting book was based on a different take of the Nativity story.
The writer Stephen Mitchell did a wonderful job of combining biblical history with his own view of how the Nativity may have taken place with emphasis being placed on Mary (Maryam) and Joseph (Yosef) instead of the traditional Christian focus being baby Jesus. While being respectful to Christians the story was more how the Annunciation and the visitation of the angels might have been seen by non-Christians which I found very interesting and the author would also give informative breakdowns of what his views were based upon. The part I enjoyed the most was probably the animals having their own introspective views. This was a well-written book and enjoyable read for any faith so all-in-all it was a good Christmas book that I would recommend to readers.
I want to thank the publisher "St. Martin's Press" and Netgalley for the opportunity to read this story and any thoughts or opinions expressed are unbiased and mine alone!
I have given this story a rating of 3 INTROSPECTIVE 🌟🌟🌟 STARS!!
I'm not sure what I was expecting as I began this book, but this was not quite it. I did enjoy this book, some chapters more than others. This is the story of The First Christmas as viewed through the eyes of some of those who were there including The Inn Keeper, an ox, Mary's donkey, the shepherds and the wisemen. Stephen Mitchell took scripture as well as what was known about the customs and history of the time and told the story we know so well from scripture. This is not the picture we westerners have imagined over the years with an angelic Mary holding baby Jesus with halos shining, but an exhausted Mary leaning up against the wall of a stable, a scared couple who could be stoned or killed at any moment for pre-marital sex or infidelity, and two animals who lovingly looked on and observed the miracle of human birth (I loved the comment about the ox wondering why nobody licked the afterbirth off the baby). This is a story of a Miracle, strength, acceptance, belief and love that is the central tenet of Christianity, a relatively short story in the gospels fleshed out in an interesting way that enable me to see, feel and experience the story in new ways. Scripture is included and although there are questions, it is still the story that I know and love. I did a read/listen with this book. The author also narrated the book which allowed him to use his voice to provide emphasis where he wanted, but I found it slow and rather mundane. In this case, I definitely enjoyed reading this one more than listening. If you are looking for a different take on the First Christmas, I recommend you pick this one up. The publisher generously provided me with a copy of this book upon request. The rating and opinions shared are my own.
While I am not a theological scholar, I have been a Christian for over sixty years. Those are years in which I have studied the Bible, and God has grown my faith. When the author of this book gives an interpretation that I disagree with, I can accept that as a difference of opinion. An example in Stephen Mitchell’s The First Christmas is the angel Gabriel’s appearance to Mary. In the Bible this event is reported in chapter one of Luke. I believe this account literally, that the angel Gabriel appeared to Mary in a physical form and spoke to her in an audible voice. In fact, there is a dialogue recorded there. The author wants to interpret the appearance as a bright light (“the best I could come up with,” he says) and its communication as “empathy and telepathy,” nothing “so gross as speech.” Based on the writings in Luke, the author is creating a fiction that, though unconfirmed, could have happened. Many describe near death experiences as a comforting, blinding, white light. So, here, the author is using his imagination within the context of an angel visiting Mary.
What is more believable in his telling of the story are the extensive thought processes that Mary must surely have engaged in during the days and months following the angel’s announcement that she had been chosen to bear the Son of God as He comes to Earth in human form. The Bible doesn’t give details of all of her thoughts and feelings, but it does record her song of praise often called The Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55). Luke also shows us that her response is meditative.
There were shepherds who had an angelic visitation. After that they came to worship the baby Jesus, explaining how they found the little family in Bethlehem filled with visitors paying their taxes. “Mary treasured up all these things, pondering them in her heart” (Luke 2:19). Using common sense and based on Biblical evidence that Mary was a reflective person, the inner dialogue the author creates is believable, even if you don’t agree with all the fictional details.
There are some larger issues with this novel, however, that bother me. Mary says “No one had ever prophesied that the Messiah would never die.” This statement skirts the issue that there were many Old Testament prophecies which predict the Messiah would be resurrected to reign in His eternal kingdom. Her statement feels like a deliberate distraction in the text. Author Mitchell is clear that Mary would know the Jewish teachings. Therefore, she would have been aware of the many prophesies that Jesus would be resurrected and sit on the right hand of God the Father (Psalm 110:1). Psalm 49:15 says “But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave, for He shall receive me.” Interpretations are acceptable, but contradictions are not.
The format of the book is interesting. The author states “my only agenda was to inhabit the characters.” He tries to put himself into an ancient time and experience it as each of the characters in the Nativity story might have. As he looks at the role each person or animal had in this pivotal moment, the author makes the decision to tell the story in the third person for the people and first person for the animals. He separates the chapters with an “Interlude” which is his opportunity to reveal his thoughts as an author and provide some background information. This format (which he explains in an Interlude is based on “the glorified sestet of an Italian sonnet) is a good choice for this book. Unfortunately, the author deviates in the second part of Mary’s story and interrupts the tale as he inserts his “authorial I” into her story rather than waiting for the Interlude. This happens again in Joseph’s story. In general I found Joseph’s tale more convincingly told. Oddly though, Mary and Joseph were approached in the book by angels who were totally different in appearance with Joseph’s angel not even culturally appropriate to the time period.
The section of The First Christmas that tells of the visit of the wise men is an elaborate fictional tale of two Jewish scholars who travel to the East studying Buddhism and other mystic philosophies that concentrate on meditation and finding the god within. It deviates from Scripture in many ways, most notably in the visions of the future of Jesus and his family that the men have as they sit with Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus. (In the book, they visit the family in the stable whereas most Christians believe this visit occurred somewhat later as the Bible says the wise men or magi went to a house.) If you believe that Jesus is the Son of God and He was with God from before the creation of the world, as set forth in John 1:1-3, then much of this chapter is disturbing. They envision a confused young man, estranged from His family, and perhaps mentally deranged. A reading of any one of the four gospels shows anything but what they see for His future. He was fully man and fully God. Their supposed vision is not in character. They even shortcut and omit important parts of His death, fantasize his burial in a mass grave, and totally neglect His resurrection.
The last major section focuses on the donkey and is my favorite. The donkey tell the Nativity story from his perspective. Recalling ancient donkey traditions, he retells the Biblical story of Balaam’s donkey who could both see angels and could talk. He points out the good qualities of donkeys—intelligence, honesty, service, dignity, and trustworthiness.
I have an admiration for the author as a multi-lingual translator, well-versed in many Eastern religions and philosophies. He possesses a great imagination and makes connections from various works of literature. I hope that he will return to the Bible to connect with Jesus in a personal relationship. I don’t regret reading The First Christmas as an intellectual exercise, but I don’t recommend it as an Advent activity or as a pleasure read.
I would like to extend my thanks to NetGalley and to St. Martin’s Press for giving me the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review.
"First Christmas" by Stephen Mitchell is a portrayal of the birth of Christ as told by the players present. We open with the Innkeeper and see how he finds it in his heart to help Mary and Joseph. This is followed by the thoughts of a very Zen-like ox bearing witness to the event. The shepherds arrive next and do not really add much, other than reflecting a public perception of what a messiah would be good for. Most interesting were the accounts of Mary and Joseph and how they each struggled with the mystery and consequences of the immaculate conception. This would be the most dramatic issue to deal with in this part of the baby Jesus era. Then the book veered off into a philosophical search for wisdom by the wise men. Finally, we are treated to the musings of a hipster donkey who is the only one able to see the crowds of visiting angels.
I am not sure who this book is for...a collection of whimsical improvisations. The chapters seemed uneven, shifting from the very real problems of dealing with virgin birth to the fairy tale tunes of the animals.
I do give it 3 stars for its originality and holy family sections. If you see any more stars it may be due to divine intervention.
Thank you to St. Martin's Press and NetGalley for providing an Advance Reader Copy in exchange for an honest review.
Thank you so much to St. martin's Essentials for the early reading copy of The First Christmas!
Stripping away the lens of Christianity through the decades, Mitchell takes a look at the Nativity and Annunciation as they may have actually looked. How would a traditional Jewish couple take the news? What about a simple shepherd or stressed innkeeper? I liked the Ox and the Donkey too!
It was fun to see which stories, psalms, and passages Mitchell was pulling his ideas from as well as his own thoughts. Some of his interpretation was tangential and distracting but overall it was an interesting mix of story, analyzing, and asking the reader to reflect and think for themselves.
There is a running theme of finding God/light/hope etc inside yourself before finding Him in the outside world, which I can appreciate as a fact since it's one's own lens that shapes their world view. The one fascinating point that I hope makes it to the final copy, is where a character separated his hurtful and angry thoughts into a separate entity and simply said "no" to them. This separate ego concept is fairly new to me but I'm interested
Some parts were pretty far out there, but I am comfortable recommending this one to interested readers, whether secular or non. Book releases 11/2, Full thoughts up on my blog!
This is such a sweet, in-depth, telling of the Christmas story from multiple points of view. The author digs deep into the thoughts and emotions that Mary and Joseph would have faced and does a good job of showing their humanity.
The story is also told from the perspective of the inn keeper's ox, Mary's donkey, the shepherds, and the wise men. I especially loved the donkey's story. He brings in other biblical references of donkeys including the story of Balaam beating his donkey when he would not pass through the angel.
The stories do vary somewhat from the Biblical nativity, which may turn off some readers. The changes were minor and didn't really add anything to this story, so I'm not sure why the author made those choices, but they did not take away from the main focus of the story for me.
I would still recommend this book but would caution readers to be flexible and don't expect it to replace the gospel.
Thank you NetGalley for this advanced reader copy in exchange for my honest review.
MAGICAL RETELLING Stephen Mitchell, revered author, translator, and anthologist, offers a poetic view of the first Christmas. It’s a fictional retelling, with chapters voiced by the Innkeeper, the Ox, the Shepherds, the Donkey. Accessible to all faiths, touching, magical, and highly recommended. Available now. Thanks to the author, St. Martin’s Press, and NetGalley for the review copy; opinions are mine.
This was not good. The way this was marketed, I assumed it would be a cute retelling of the nativity story. Something to be shared with children at Christmas. This is definitely not for children. It reads like a textbook or the most boring Sunday school lesson that ever existed. The author is brash and boring at the same time. Discussing a donkey's sexual needs was not something I was looking for in a sweet Christmas story. The interludes are also highly unnecessary and were the most textbook feeling bits. I think the most jarring bits were the constant switching of POV. I thought it was a cute idea to have the story told through the eyes of the donkey who carried Mary, and it kinda was. But the author switched to so many other POV and focused on unnecessary bit that it just ended up being cumbersome and boring and something I just wanted to finish so I could move one. Much love to St. Martin's Press for my copy.
A very unique way of looking at the nativity scene. Each chapter is told from a different perspective from each of the characters that would have been there that night. And then there is an interlude between each chapter that the author explains why he feels like his thoughts as each character would be accurate. He digs into the thoughts and emotions of everyone and everything, even the animals. I think my favorite chapter was of the Ox. It was humorous yet heartfelt. This made me ponder the first Noel in a new light, and I think that was the author’s intention. Thanks to St. Martins Essential and Netgalley for this Arc in exchange for my review.
This spoke straight to my heart, as Stephen Mitchell tends to do. I love the way he chose to tell this story, from the POV of the various people and animals in attendance, within the context of the culture and time period, with interludes and reflections from other faiths and spiritual disciplines. I especially enjoyed the backstory of the wise men and the source of their wisdom. This is a refreshing and moving look from a broad spiritual perspective at something that is all too often approached narrowly, rigidly, and dogmatically.
The description of this book sounded like it would be an interesting read of a twist to the traditional Christmas story told from the personal viewpoint of people and animals in the traditional Christmas story.
I had a very hard time reading this book, and actually did not finish it as I found it too offensive to my thoughts and beliefs as a Christian and my thoughts toward the Christmas story. Everything today seems to be directed to not offend the beliefs of anyone, so the author tried to appeal to all religions and beliefs in his writing which to me, made many of the ideas expressed just too outlandish.
I received a copy of this book from St. Martin’s Essentials and NetGalley. The opinions expressed are my own.
The First Christmas A Story of New Beginnings by Stephen Mitchell Book starts out with other works by the author and a dedication page. Quotes about the event are noted. Forward with footnotes are included. Each chapter has a small quote and then the story. Like how the author takes the nativity and picks it apart. We were brought up Catholic and we know the story but he opens new windows with this version. From the very beginning, the innkeeper. we know there was no room at the inns but yet one innkeeper found them a place to spend the night. You never hear of the keeper himself so this author wants to tell his story. Interlude for each chapter is fresh eyes on the subject. Love the chapter with the donkey, ox and other animals. so cool to hear it from their perspective. Mary and Joseph also have their own chapters. Just when you thought you really understood the carol: away in a manger, it's really opened my eyes to how it could have been. Appendixes, notes and references and acknowledgements are also included at the end. Really enjoyed reading this one. Received this review copy from St. Martin's Press, St. Martin's Essentials via Netgalley and this is my honest opinion.
5 wise stars I have heard and read the story of the first Christmas hundreds of times. I had a few doubts about trying another version. I’m so glad I did! Sticking close to biblical texts and Jewish history of the time, Mitchell brings fresh perspectives to a familiar story.
Mary and Joseph ask themselves and God many questions as they prepare for a one-of-a-kind event. Their doubts turn into brave acceptance. I particularly enjoyed the perspectives of the ox and donkey. They added a gentle touch of humor and charm to the story.
The author, Stephen Mitchell, does an outstanding job of narrating the story. His voice is clear and mellifluous. His calm tone adds to the magic of The First Christmas. I listened to the audiobook, but I believe either print or audio would make a great gift.
Thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for providing an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
This is a retelling of the Nativity from viewpoints of many of the people and animals involved (not including the baby). The Innkeeper, shepherds, ox, donkey, Mary, Joseph, and more all have chapters, and their stories are interspersed with some pretty thought-provoking interludes from the author.
What I liked most about this is a couple of the chapters really made me think specifically about the feelings and worries of the people involved, instead of just viewing them as archtypes. I also really liked the Interludes - the author had some great insights.
Thanks to Netgalley and the author for letting me read an ARC of this book. I can think of a couple of people I'd like to purchase it for this holiday season.
A Story of New Beginnings In The First Christmas, Stephen Mitchell brings the Nativity story to vivid life as never before. A narrative that is only sketched out in two Gospels becomes fully realized here with nuanced characters and a setting that reflects the culture of the time. Mitchell has suffused the birth of Jesus with a sense of beauty that will delight and astonish readers.
This is a very interesting look at the Nativity. Each chapter is told from the point of view of the individual. Even an ox and a donkey contribute. We watch as a young Mary struggles to understand what is being asked of her and what it means. Joseph struggles as well.
We hear from the shepherds, the Wise Men, and even the Inn Keeper. Not in any Biblical way either. Just imagine what actual human beings would think and talk about.
I enjoyed the research and all of the interpretations. The story moved me more than the differing biblical ones.
NetGalley/ November 9th, 2021 by St. Martin’s Essentials
I wanted to like this book. But this book was the okayest book I have read in a long time. I grew up in a very religious southern baptist family and so I was hoping this would be a fun and light take on the Christmas story told from so different view points.
Well, the story was told from different view points but the writing was so religious and at a scholarly level it was hard to make this a light and enjoyable read. Let me explain this even clearer, I have read MacArthur Study Bibles that are easier to read.
If you are looking for a cute story for Christmas this is not it. However if you want a deeper dive into Jewish life in the time that Jesus was born this is the book for you.
Thank you to St. Martin Essentials for sending me this free copy for review.
I was invited by the publisher to read this interesting take on the First Christmas, by Stephen Mitchell. An intriguing premise, the book looks at the birth of Christ through the eyes of those near the birth of Christ. Each chapter is told in a narrative by different characters – The innkeeper, an ox, and a donkey, Mary, Joseph, the Shepherds and the Wise Men. By far, the Inn Keeper’s point of view was the most interesting of the narratives written. One could sense the overwhelming feeling he may have experienced as Bethlehem welcomed guests for the census. Sights, sounds and smells are easy to experience through his eyes. And then, there’s the rest of the book. Between each chapter is the author’s interlude. It’s jarring; as it pulls the reader out of the story, and I’m not sure it is necessary. The author explains why things were written in the previous chapter, or it’s a pause to teach a point, or to present a theological viewpoint. These points would have been better written as an author’s note at the very end of the work of fiction. The author has a sense of humour which is seen through some of the character sketches, as well as in these interludes. The shepherds aren’t painted in a very good light. They are characterized as simpletons, uneducated and buffoons. When I think of other shepherds recorded in the Bible, they are far from this picture painted. The depiction of angels is bizarre, and borders on mysticism, straying from the Judeo-Christian (and biblical) narrative. As purely a fictional read, the author creates an interesting world of the first Christmas from several points of view. However, if readers of biblical fiction expect a close representation from the biblical account, they will be disappointed. I received an ecopy from the publisher through NetGalley. All opinions expressed are my own.
This was an interesting take on the First Christmas, complete with a POV from the ox and the donkey. It was humorous in some parts (I mean, POV from the ox and donkey?) and overall just a completely different retelling. I'm sure there will be some who will be offended by this book. I'm not a very religious person but am a believer and I did not find this offensive at all. It's just someone's take on how it might have all happened. I have to say I didn't love it but it was enjoyable.
Thank you to St. Martin's Press and NetGalley for the review copy.
I really liked this "behind the scenes" portrait of the birth of Jesus. The author describes the thoughts that Mary and Joseph must have been having, given the time, the culture, the religion, etc. He also gave voice to the shepherds, the animals, and the others that were there at the time of Christ's birth. I thought he did a really good job.
I received an e-ARC of this book by the author and publishing via Netgalley. This does not affect my opinion regarding the book.
The First Christmas was a charming look at the nativity story through several different lenses, including Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, wise men, and even the ox and donkey. I think this book gave the birth of Jesus some interesting depth, while also understanding this is just one man's interpretation of the story. If you are looking for a different way to bring the Christmas story to life, I would give this a try!
This was a great book to read to get into the Christmas spirit. The author interjects information on his research about the ideas and way of thinking for people (and animals-sounds strange but it worked!) of that time period in the years leading up to Jesus’s birth. This would be a great gift for religious family members who love to read.
Huge thanks to @stmartinspress and @stmartinsessentials for my copy of The First Christmas by Stephen Mitchell. I really appreciated the story as it helped remind me of the true meaning of Christmas.
Even though this year has been hard I still have so many things to be thankful for especially my family.
I received this in a good reads giveaway. Whether you believe in the nativity story or not this is one that tells the story in a new way. The author goes into the culture of the time in a beautifully written way. The book doesn’t focus on the Mary, Joseph and the birth but winds itself around it.