Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Saint-Just

Rate this book
Book by Hampson, Norman

256 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1991

2 people are currently reading
55 people want to read

About the author

Norman Hampson

25 books8 followers
Norman Hampson was the Professor of History at the University of York from 1974 to 1989 and fellow of the British Academy in 1980. He specialised in the French Revolution and European Enlightenment. During the Second World War Hampson's service in the Royal Navy included two years as liaison officer with the Free French Navy.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (7%)
4 stars
4 (28%)
3 stars
4 (28%)
2 stars
3 (21%)
1 star
2 (14%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Denise.
7,547 reviews138 followers
October 25, 2020
Such a fascinating figure, such a dry as the desert read. I tried to read this years ago but gave up somewhere in the middle because it was such a slog. Hampson doesn't appear to even try to see his subject as a human being rather than just a collection of speeches and political ideas, leaving the reader with little more sense of Saint-Just's personality than they had going in.
Profile Image for Rach.
37 reviews8 followers
March 16, 2008
Saint-Just is one of the most fascinating figures of the French Rev in my mind ~ and a rather shadowy one ~ but I wasn't thrilled with this biography. Though I generally liked where Hampson was coming from (i.e. S-J was a turkey of the first magnitude) yet by the time I'd finished reading it I felt I didn't know much more about him than I had done after reading Palmer's beautiful "Twelve Who Ruled"; the Twelve being the members of the infamous Committee of Public Safety of 1793-94, and S-J being only one of them, and not the one most focused on.

Hampson's style I found a little hard to get into, and rather than seeing S-J as a man ~ a man with friends (or not), relationships, daily interchanges, etc ~ I could only see him in terms of the vague "history" of his political thought and its contradictions, and clearly Hampson thinks very little of his thought altogether, as S-J in this light is seen as fairly changeable an immature. I'm starting another bio of S-J, and already am on my way to taking more notes on it in the first 30 pgs than I had throughout the whole of Hampson's work. To give it the benefit of the doubt, however, this might (italics needed on "might") be a work to return to as an interesting analysis once I feel I have a better grasp on the outline of S-J's life.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.