What do you think?
Rate this book


176 pages, Paperback
Published November 29, 2021
I was pleasantly surprised to find a copy of Terryl Givens' Doors of Faith in the mail the other week. I had been getting a book here and there from the A Brief Theological Introduction series on the Book of Mormon, but I assumed I had been removed from the list. Good to know I haven't been kicked off yet!
I met Terryl Givens once. I didn't get to talk to him, but he was a keynote speaker at the one Northstar conference I attended (not really my thing now, but it was a help during a chapter of my life). I found it an interesting choice of guest speaker given the context-- all of us sad gays-- but Givens' address was masterful. His talk centered around adjust our focus in the Church and Christianity in general around sinfulness to woundedness. It wasn't an entirely new idea for me-- my mission had centered Alma 7:11-13 that says Christ came to take upon him the pains and the sicknesses of his people. But for me it still seemed like a "yes, and" kind of statement, while Givens was radically recentering Christ's mission around our wounds rather than our sins. I remember him saying something along the lines of, this generation doesn't respond to messages of hellfire and damnation and instead are yearning for a message of healing.
I went through an extended Givens obsession where I tried to read everything Givens had released in print. I read The Good Who Weeps, The Christ Who Heals, The Crucible of Doubt, Wrestling with the Angel, and Feeding the Flock. While the books cover a lot of ground, I would distill Givens' work down to five main ideas:
That last point in particular is threaded through every page of Givens' work. He quotes widely from Julian of Norwich to David Hume, from Emanuel Swedenborg to Dorothy Sayers. I read Terryl Givens not only for his own ideas but for his bibliography. I ended up going down a Nikolai Berdyaev rabbit hole a few years ago, just as one example. Givens kind of popped on the lid open on a world of beautiful Christian and religious ideas that I had never encountered before. It helped spark my own search for the good and the true that I now knew wasn't only contained in my own tradition.
Terryl's vision of the Church is not what the Church looks like now:
I worship a Christ who wants peers, not subjects. Friends, not servants. He comes as our healer, not our judge.
At its worst, our culture can be anti-intellectual, judgmental, authoritarian and shallow. But I love it for what is best in it: the total commitment it invites, its optimistic assessment of human potential, and the most generous God in the religious universe, one who is willing to shepherd every human soul without exception to his own exalted status as a holy being living in holy relationships.
His is a very progressive and open-minded church that engages with the world, not one that holds itself above the world grasping its capital-T Truth. He emphasizes doctrines that are truly a part of our heritage, but are no longer emphasized and oftentimes forgotten our outright countered e.g. the idea that we can progress through kingdoms. How can we aspire to this if most do not share this vision?
On the other hand, I think Givens judges those who leave the Church too harshly. He allows himself to see the flaws of the Church, but he also doesn't seem to be able to fully sympathize with those who leave. But then, this is fundamentally a work of apologetics. In the early chapters of his book, he describes members who leave as not being "witting" enough to stay in the Church:
In the Christian world and among our fellow Latter-Day Saints, many are choosing, in John's words, to "[walk] no more with [us]." The numbers are heartbreaking. Many and varied are the causes, and all are to be lamented. I am going to propose, as one explanation for what is happening among our own community, the words of the poet Thomas Traherne: "No man... that clearly seeth the beauty of God's face... can when he sees it clearly, willingly, and wittingly forsake it."
If that is true-- yet everywhere we turn, men and women are "willingly forsaking the beauty of God's face"-- then perhaps the choices are not being made "wittingly." Perhaps too many of us never came to fully know and see what Traherne and Gregory-- knew and saw and therefore loved.
I don't think this is the case. I think many choose to leave because they too like Givens do find that God is a loving God, and yet don't see it in the institutional church they are a part of. They can't reconcile the two. People aren't leaving because they don't love God or haven't come to know him; they are leaving because they have, and it is not the God they were taught to know.
In sum, I don't feel like Doors of Faith doesn't cover a lot of new ground, but I don't think the book is meant to do that. It does have a good overview of the ideas that Terryl has developed throughout his works, a body of ideas that paints a picture of what it could mean to be a Latter-Day Saint.
We only know Christ--really know him--to the extent that we know what his love for us cost him. And so, perhaps, that is the primary mode by which Christ knows and engages us--by our wounds. By feeling our wounds. That would seem to be the meaning of his words, "I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands." We know him by his wounds as he knows us by ours.
It is not fashionable in today's secular age to speak of trust in an institution. My institutional trust in the Church of Jesus Christ is rooted in my self-knowledge and in my work as a historian. Simply put, I need the Church and you, its members. I need the inspiration that comes of our shared discipline of instruction and reminding; I need the discipline of stewardship and sacrifice and service. There are no solitary saints, and I harbor no delusions about my capacity for unassisted self-transcendence. I am not the measure of all things. I want to be taught, instructed, guided--and I believe benevolent Heavenly Parents have made provision for revealing their plan and their principles to inspired figures who have managed, however imperfectly, to pierce the veils of ignorance that blight our world. And they have revealed covenants and ordinances that tap into unseen reservoirs of spiritual light and power. Joseph knew, as I have felt, that the vicissitudes of mortality and the frailties of human commitment tend toward chaos and disintegration. Entropy appears to be a universal principle not only of thermodynamics but of civilization and human relationships. In spite of the best efforts of the most earnest individuals, marriages fail, friendships fade, and family ties falter. In priesthood and temple practices, I have experienced a power as real as the laws of physics, one that assists in the formation of more durable bonds that connect individuals to each other and to God.