For whatever reason, my review on audible was cut off, and there is no way to edit it. So here's the full rant, because I feel like readers should be fully warned about the cringe-worthy writing in this laughable excuse of a novel (that's actually the size of a novella, really). I don't know what these other high-praise reviewers read, but it couldn't possibly be the same thing I did. I mean really, I feel ashamed of mankind, actually embarrassed that people think this is good writing. Just shows how much education in English has declined. Even more so that people thought the plot was *good* just shows how dense people are. And yes, I'm totally talking about you reviewers out there singing this book's praises. It's reviewers like the ones for this book that falsify what is really behind the cover. Enough is enough, I say! Be honest for once. This book was horrible!
Audiobook narration was brilliant, as always with Tavia Gilbert (and the reason I bought this from audible in the first place), but the story was like a regurgitated piece of steak. I'll just make a quick list of things that immediately stand out to me.
1) A character is killed at the beginning of the book (Tom), which is fine and all, but the main character, Shaley, is in a state of grief and sadness throughout the novel, though we have absolutely no connection with the dude who was murdered. I'd say about three minutes was spent on Tom's character before he was whacked off. There wasn't even any substantial flashbacks to show Tom's and Shaley's friendship as the investigation unfolds (unless you count her remembering him shaking a hand). So instead of sympathizing with Shaley, I wanted to rip her arms off and beat her (or myself) with them. Which brings me to . . .
2) As much as Shaley is saddened and cries over the above character, she goes shopping the next day with her bff for fun. This was a WTF? moment. If you've lost a close friend, you understand that the last thing you feel like doing is "having fun." Sure, there was much needed levity, but the author decides to write her MC as a hollow, selfish little girl. Any character that's worth a sh*t will grieve, but Shaley only does at random and when she just happens to remember that one of her close friends on tour was murdered. And even then, it's not convincing. How can it be when Tom's treated more like a plot device than her friend? With only a day passing since Tom's horrific murder (which she saw the body first), it should have been fresh and haunting in her mind. But no, name-brand jeans are more important. The mall scene was a poor attempt at a plot point. It could have been written at a different place for different reasons and had the same plot result. Instead, Shaley is made to look like a sniveling, unfeeling, rich rockstar's daughter as she battles the paparazzi while shopping.
3) When Shaley finds out her murdered friend was in love with her--and I'm talking hundreds of photos of her on Tom's walls with "I love Shaley" in big letters between them and creepy roses to form a shrine--she doesn't think it's creepy. Neither does anyone else. Not her mom, best friend, or the detective. Instead, the detective asks Shaley if they were dating, and her mother believes her daughter's been lying to her this whole time. Cause a love shrine of someone is normal in a relationship between a horny 25 year old man and an underage 16 year old girl. Another WTF? moment. Cause really, that's not weird or stalkerish. Noooo. That's "normal" and doesn't deserve a second thought except for how Shaley would have reacted to the news that Tom was in love with her if he was still alive. My reaction? Restraining order. And what really blows my mind after this revelation? No one suspects that Shaley could be Tom's murderer, even though she could possibly have a motive if she knew of said shrine, AND she found the body. Nah, that's not suspicious. Even Shaley and her best friend randomly think the room service guy at the hotel (who doesn't work at the concert hall where the murder took place) could be Tom's murderer. They don't want to "rule anyone out."
Hold on, brb as I go shake the detective and ask why he never suspected Shaley, even if she ended up not being the murderer.
All the characters were idiots!
4) The band members are mentioned by name randomly as if the reader should know who the hell they are, though they are never introduced. I didn't know, I just had to assume that's who the author meant when she listed about 5 names I'd yet to hear about. Who else would be hanging at the hotel with them? Maybe she was talking about random people staying at the hotel? Aliens, perhaps? Who knows? Certainly not the reader.
5) The entire book was written as if by an abandoned child who has never had any sort of connection with another human being. It's like me trying to write from the perspective of a dog and expecting dogs (if they could read) to believe and feel as if what I've written is real and wholly possible. They'd probably bark at me in shame for my lame attempts at their thoughts and feelings. (Though I do love giving commentary of what I think is going on through my dogs' heads.) There was no understanding of deeper emotions, no character development, nor was there a sense of mounting suspicion, which is ridiculous since this book is clearly trying to be a mystery/thriller ("trying" being the key word; I don't know what you'd call this). If it wasn't for the fact that Tavia Gilbert was the narrator, I would have stuck pencils in my ears just to stop the story from sucking away any more of my life.
6) Carly (or however it's spelled--audiobook, remember?) randomly comes onto the scene halfway through the book and starts preaching about God. The first thing I wonder is: who is this person? She hadn't been mentioned before, unless it was in passing. This seemed typical in this book, and Carly (sp?) is yet another character that just randomly shows up, has a conversation with the character, and is hardly mentioned again. On top of that, the woman didn't give any sound advice to Shaley about her problems and fears. All she did was spout religious BS about how God is "always watching" so Shaley shouldn't be worried about the potential killer who has Shaley's name on his hit-list (personally, I find this to be another reason for Shaley's name to be on the suspect list--maybe she wants people to think she's the victim). No wonder the idiot girl ends up trapping herself in a closet with the killer at the end of the book. No worries, not only is the crazy killer always watching, so is God, therefore she is safe. WTF? Also, the conversation about God is randomly brought up, even becoming a focal thought for Shaley, though God isn't mentioned up to that point. Shaley found God, and it only took a few lines of dialouge from an unknown character. Ooooohkay. If the religious aspects were written well, it wouldn't have been an issue, but it was literally thrown in there like an after thought. Every time God was mentioned, there was no segue into the idea of Him. "Let's order room service. Who is Tom's killer? No worries, God is always watching." o.O Right. Like random sentences thrown together all willy-nilly.
7) The only real praise I have for the actual writing of the book was from the killer's perspective. Only in small doses though. After about the third time of reading something in his POV, I was going, "Yeah, yeah. You're more intelligent than everyone, Shaley is ungrateful for you killing the guy who was stalking her, though I'm actually praising you for being the only one who realized how creepy that dude was, and you're tired/pissed off/or otherwise unhappy about something. Get on with it already..." Like I said, the killer's POV was interesting the first two times. Later, I was just annoyed with the repetition.
8) And last: the killer had no motive to go after Shaley. None whatsoever. It was unbelievable, and a very rookie mistake for a published author to make. How did the publisher not point this out? I mean, really? Your novel has a villain who is evil for evil's sake? Where's the motive? What was the point? Shaley was ungrateful--that's what this entire novel came down to? Forget finding out who the killer was, which wasn't suspenseful and was quickly thrown in your face, let's talk motive! The killer is there to watch after and protect Shaley--someone pays him for this--therefore he decides she needs to be killed because she doesn't realize he's keeping her "safe"? WTF? Come on! ::slams head repeatedly into the wall::
The reason for two stars instead of one? Tavia saved this book. Thank His Noodly Appendage for that! /rant