Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Philosophy of Egoism

Rate this book
Includes the unedited 1905 text 'The Philosophy of Egoism' by James L Walker. Also included is 'The Question of Copyright' by James L Walker. These texts are in the public domain. I make minimal profit from the sales of these works. Enjoy. >:3~Alexander

137 pages, Paperback

First published June 1, 1972

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

James L. Walker

21 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
5 (27%)
4 stars
3 (16%)
3 stars
8 (44%)
2 stars
2 (11%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
8 reviews
January 20, 2023
This will serve as a good introduction to egoism for people in the English-speaking world. The Unique and its Property is probably the better place to start, at least from a historical perspective. But, for English readers, the translated version of The Unique is much more difficult to read than this text.
7 reviews
September 7, 2025
In parole ciò che penso da sempre, capito già dalla sinossi. L’opera si sviluppa poi in vari campi e su varie discussioni, esegesi di una filosofia ben più ampia e radicale, condivisibile o meno, indispensabile per avere uno sguardo più ampio sui moventi dell’uomo.
Profile Image for Apio.
32 reviews
February 21, 2011
James L. Walker was the first person to introduce Max Stirner's ideas to English-speaking anarchists (and others) in Benjamin Tucker's publication, Liberty. In this book, he summarized his understanding of egoism as drawn from Stirner. Walker wrote clearly, with humor, and with pithy statements that merit quoting. If his ideas sometimes reflect certain of the limits of 19th century American individualist anarchists, nonetheless, he maintained a strong anti-moralist perspective (in this way showing a much deeper understanding of Stirner and of egoism than Tucker). Though he tried to salvage egoist meanings for such words as "justice," "duty," and "altruism," as I read through his critiques in the book, I realized that he did thoroughly demolish them as fixed ideas... For me, this would mean ceasing to use the words in any positive way. He chose, instead, to make them so personal as to have no possible universal meaning. In any case, the book is well worth reading for those interested in egoism.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews