Che cosa significa orientarsi nel pensiero?

by Immanuel Kant

Nell'ottobre del 1786, Kant si risolse a prendere posizione nella disputa circa il presunto spinozismo di Lessing, accesasi tra il campione dell'illuminismo berlinese Moses Mendelssohn e il fideista Friedrich Jacobi, autore delle celebri Lettere sulla dottrina di Spinoza. Lo fece con il breve scritto "Che cosa significa orientarsi nel pensiero?". La domanda alla quale Kant cerca di rispondere riguarda come si possa orientare il pensiero nelle questioni di confine che oltrepassano sia il piano logico-formale della razionalità sia quello trascendentale del suo rapporto a priori con la forma dell'esperienza. A partire, anzitutto, dalla questione relativa alla conoscibilità di alla pensabilità del suo concetto e alla dimostrazione razionale della sua esistenza. Il carattere esemplare del saggio kantiano sta nel modo in cui affronta questo nodo fino a convertire la domanda metafisica per eccellenza nel problema dell'orientamento in filosofia. Così il saggio assume un valore paradigmatico sia per la filosofia kantiana, per il suo carattere intimamente critico, sia per il pensare filosofico in generale.

Kindle Edition

Published July 13, 2018

About the author

Immanuel Kant was an 18th-century philosopher from Königsberg, Prussia (now Kaliningrad, Russia). He's regarded as one of the most influential thinkers of modern Europe & of the late Enlightenment. His most important work is The Critique of Pure Reason, an investigation of reason itself. It encompasses an attack on traditional metaphysics & epistemology, & highlights his own contribution to these areas. Other main works of his maturity are The Critique of Practical Reason, which is about ethics, & The Critique of Judgment, about esthetics & teleology.

Pursuing metaphysics involves asking questions about the ultimate nature of reality. Kant suggested that metaphysics can be reformed thru epistemology. He suggested that by understanding the sources & limits of human knowledge we can ask fruitful metaphysical questions. He asked if an object can be known to have certain properties prior to the experience of that object. He concluded that all objects that the mind can think about must conform to its manner of thought. Therefore if the mind can think only in terms of causality–which he concluded that it does–then we can know prior to experiencing them that all objects we experience must either be a cause or an effect. However, it follows from this that it's possible that there are objects of such a nature that the mind cannot think of them, & so the principle of causality, for instance, cannot be applied outside experience: hence we cannot know, for example, whether the world always existed or if it had a cause. So the grand questions of speculative metaphysics are off limits, but the sciences are firmly grounded in laws of the mind. Kant believed himself to be creating a compromise between the empiricists & the rationalists. The empiricists believed that knowledge is acquired thru experience alone, but the rationalists maintained that such knowledge is open to Cartesian doubt and that reason alone provides us with knowledge. Kant argues, however, that using reason without applying it to experience will only lead to illusions, while experience will be purely subjective without first being subsumed under pure reason. Kant’s thought was very influential in Germany during his lifetime, moving philosophy beyond the debate between the rationalists & empiricists. The philosophers Fichte, Schelling, Hegel and Schopenhauer saw themselves as correcting and expanding Kant's system, thus bringing about various forms of German Idealism. Kant continues to be a major influence on philosophy to this day, influencing both Analytic and Continental philosophy.