This is in my top 3 Smith books but, as I cannot remember a fucking THING 7 year later (I'm guessing there's a hotel), I need to reread it to say why that is. Or you can just make up some of your own shit, drop it below, and I'll add it here. Come on, team: together we can give this review the review it deserves! Oh happy day!
_____________________________________________________
The Review as Example of Transcendental/Participatory Collectivism:
As noted by a preeminent mind of both numbers and letters, “it has the same number of words in its title as in the author’s name” (Bursey 1). While that’s some deeply complex, cryptogrammic-levels of literature’s quiddity, it may be too cute by 1/2 and too Canadian by 100%. Gaelic-mononymician Fionnuala, writing for the academic journal Writing for the Academic Journal, proffers this as the "4th Smith book...read, the 2nd that had a two word title, the 1st that had 4 main characters, and maybe the 7th favourite [sic] of the 8 Smith books...read—or the 2nd least memorable as it were" (2-8). Add that up and you get (I haven't a calculator or abacus on me at the moment) x; or, more precisely, a solitary 1, a couple of 2's, a number of 4's, and the frequently deadly 7-8 supercluster. Across the pond (Atlantic Ocean; not a pond), this integer, unknowable though it may be, must be retro-proactively addended to the priorly precedential slew of 2's, 100, and, lest anyone forget, a full 1/2 (0.5). Which, yes, is half a whole number. In lieu of any rational argument against, null, and/or too strongly in favor of, these findings may collectively say everything about Smith's ho(te)ly reliquary and the quickening properties of communion. Then again, they could say absolutely nothing at all. Does it really matter?
Or, per the estimable and esteemed Swither’s Preface found in the Norton Critical Edition (approx. 1 hr ago, 2025), “[t]here’s a dumb waiter fatality […] [w]hat more could anyone want?!” Indeed. Indeed and huzzah. This, then, may be the greatest ontological question of our time. Then again, it may just be an excuse to crowbar ‘ontological’ into a sentence. Perhaps we’re reminded of even better angels via Nicols, Glasgow’s leading intersectionalist in the emerging field of Stereolab-Percival Everettism. “Jah,” he affirms, “dieses Bucht ist sehr schön!” (9). Sung by Laetitia Sadier, that very same chestnut of Socialist realpolitik pamphleteering transcends into something sublime; oh, sweet bird of Switched-On beauty issued in breathy, Frenchy bubblegumtongue song.
Works Cited
Bursey, Jeff. “Hotel World and the participatory revieworama.” Goodreads Inc & Co. & Holdings LTD., LLC. 1 v1, 2025.
Fionnuala. "Ali Smith's Hotel World and its numerical contribution to Irish independence from the monotony of bloody ol' England." Writing for the Academic Journal, 21 2(8), 2025.
Nicols, MJ. The Radical Peng of Ali Smith’s Hotel World as Noise-Bursts (With Announcements). Knopf, NY, 2025.
Swither, Morbid. “Preface.” The Norton Critical Ed. of Hotel World (Smith, Ali, with Swither, Stills and Nash contributing). The University of Centerville, 2 (xiii). 1 hr and change ago, 2025.