A so-and-so book
Any review to this book would have to start off by stating that it is part of Taschen Publishing's "Basic Arts" series. As such, it is relatively short at only 80 pages (a large portion of which consist of illustrations as opposed to text). Hence if one is looking for an in-depth academic tome on the subject this is not the book.
Having said that and gotten it out of the way, it needs to be stated that the best thing about the book is the quality of the illustrations. Absolutely gorgeous. Definitely not quality matching high-end museum books (i.e., $100 and above) but not far behind. All the more impressive considering this book's price range of around $10-$15. The illustrations of Lempicka's are absolutely stunning and, alone, make the book worth owning.
Another positive, in addition to the illustrations, is the biographic information we provide (albeit it is very brief). The reader learns that she seems to have come from an upper middle class Eastern European background, was very nihilist, free-spirited, materialist, class-oriented and was quite the sexual creature. However, other than the sexuality, there is little explanation linking these aspects of her life to her art.
The above are the positives of the book. Unfortunately, the book also has quite a few negatives. A minor one is the fact that it is very verbose. In a longer book this would not be a problem but in a short book where every word has to count this is. A more serious problem is that the book, unlike the better ones in the Taschen "Basic Art" series, provides nothing whatsoever on her technique. The Taschen books on Watteau and Vermeer, for example, describe Watteau's use of thick and quick brush strokes and Vermeer's use of the Camera Obscura.
The third and most serious problem is the book has practically no discussion of her "style". The only mention of how her art changed over time is when, as she was fading from fame, she moved to an "abstract" style. There is no discussion or analysis of how her art subtlety changed, within its own unique "style" from the 1920s through the 1960s. Additionally, there is no discussion of how it was influenced by other schools of art (New Objectivity, Futurist, etc.) or, vice-versa, how it influenced (or not) other schools or, even for that matter, other artists. This is especially a pity as the book is geared towards the novice as opposed to the knowledgeable or those with an intermediate level of knowledge on the subject.
In short, a three-star book.