1 star is "I don't like it" as per GR's rating system.
Humor is very hard to do well and it should be a by product, not the goal itself. The writing here is amateurish. The best explanation I can give is like this person is giving a humorous account of something. If you're friends with this person, you humor them and nod along. If you're a stranger, you get up and leave because you owe them nothing.
The writing here is like the person chatting along, taking a long time to get to something but I'm a stranger and I don't owe them anything so I get up and leave. I think the first few chapters can be condensed a lot into a few paragraphs and not lose anything. And don't introduce so many people so quickly. And explain your characters so readers know what is what and who is who. Lastly, this book does not need alternating POVs. There isn't much to differentiate the characters' personalities to be honest and it's not necessary. Yes, books are not sprints, they don't have to get anywhere fast but the writing just isn't interesting, it's just a lot of writing. In the end it was just too amateurish and I was glad to dnf it.
Edit: After reading the top review, a priest married to a police chief doesn't instantly make the book interesting. Their personalities or what they do is what makes it interesting.