I ran out of tea halfway through Steve Baker's chapter that was called something about Leopards, but was really about Deleuze and Guattari's theory of becoming-animal. When I returned from the boiled kettle and the newly-made cup, I had forgotten why the ape hanging on the window-sill was important. But returning to Deleuzian theory is a bit like returning to a dream - it all makes perfect sense until you wake up, and second time around it's never the same as the first. I like that after giving a long definition of what Baker believes becoming-animal 'signifies' he then says: "This hardly amounts to a definition of becoming-animal, but it is already clear that Deleuze and Guattari, sceptical of fixity, will not be providing a definition as such". Thanks for trying though, Steve. To be honest though, this chapter did make the strange, squishy theory have a bit of substance in the centre, or maybe around the sides. Unfortunately, I can't quite grab it yet because of all the squishiness.