Why on earth did I decide to keep going on with this book when after the first chapter I was already miserable? Perhaps I wanted to prove myself a point, that I was listening. Or maybe it was for the sole purpose of being able to write this review after only seeing absolute praise for it. Whatever the case may be, now you all have to suffer and see my review.
Now I had multiple problems with this book, so much so, that I started a new document to write notes to purely for this and ended with more planned for this review than I have for most of my university essays. Let's start from the thing that is the most consistent with this book. The one thing this book does is presenting social media as only a problem and seemingly the singular reason why we are not listening. To me, personally, this seems counterproductive to the point of the book, of getting people to think about listening and furthermore ignoring other major factors that impact our listening. Surely there are other reasons why human beings are supposedly bad at listening to each other nowadays, besides social media, which has existed for barely a decade. Hate to be the Gen Z, but to me this book felt a lot like the older (using that term very loosely) people in my life, that have been making social media into this borderline Devil for ages. Of course there are bad things happening to us because we spend too much time online, but this book keeps just repeating this one point over and over and seems to just get stuck in blaming it, instead of expanding further.
Speaking of repetition, the author is constantly repeating herself. In total she presents very few
actual points throughout the book, since most of the points are just the same thing reworded and put to a different chapter. Also considering the premise and the title of this book it does very little to offer any real or concrete solutions to any of the problems presented. Sure, the author constantly points out that we are not listening and we look at out phones and this affects us mentally etc. etc. but she never seems to offer anything that we concretely change about ourselves or societal structures and norms that have made it this way. I mean she doesn't have to of course, but it seems kind of pointless to write a book about people not listening and that just being it. No solutions, no nothing. Just be better, I guess.
Probably no surprise to a lot of people, but this whole book comes across as very preachy. And it does get rather annoying. More so, Murphy makes it seem as every single person is a bad listener and that is something to feel guilty about. The tone throughout is very patronizing towards the reader, whilst the author constantly brings up how she listened to this person and this person and learnt so much and is so wise and such a good journalist. It really does feel like at times that she wrote this book purely to feed her own ego. It doesn't help that there are so many name drops of all the famous people the author has talked with and the talks about her own experiences as a listener to many of them, that serve no purpose to the people reading the book. Besides name dropping bunch of people she has talked to, there are tons of other name drops as well, usually to reference one line of their research and then go on tangent. This makes this an extremely slow read and most of the book is just meaningless filler, that does not really contribute much to the actual point of the book.
And now for the nitpicking. Here are a few things that are not acknowledged at all, which is a bit weird for a book about listening: doesn't acknowledge in any way how minorities are affected and only offers solutions and research from a narrow group, ignores neurodivergency which can affect your ability listen and ignores the societal standard, that somehow still exists, where a man is more likely to be listened to and not talked over and what he is saying being valued more. Of course the author doesn't have to include any of these kind of major points, that surely have research behind them. But considering that the book is filled with a variety of microaggressions, I am not surprised if not acknowledging minorities was a conscious choice on the authors part. What microaggressions, you may ask. The entire part where Murphy discusses politics is filled with bunch of examples, but if you want more specific instances: use of the term "sexual preference" instead of orientation (as if it's a preference to be hated and actively killed in some countries), judging people for protesting against police violence (yes, she straight up praises police officers in this book, I wish I was kidding). Also I haven't seen a single review mention this, but the author refers to a research that suggest that autism is only a thing in male brains. Hello, is no one else getting some warning bells? The whole tone of the book just feels very ignorant and only seems to present certain things, precisely from the authors own standpoint, which furthers the feeling of hypocrisy considering the subject matter.
The sad thing is that the research might have been really interesting, if not for literally everything else in this book, including how the research was presented. Maybe I should have just taken the advice from the last chapter and realized that some things are just not worth listening to. Or maybe my brain has just rotten from being online and I am a bad listener. Who knows, but I would suggest not wasting your time with this one.