I found this advice misguided. Although the author admits this isn’t a book for systemic change, she doesn’t present anything we should be perpetuating either. There are times when we respond in unsavory ways out of survival and necessity (pretending we don’t have kids, hiding our authentic selves for the sake of men, smiling when we don’t mean it, apologizing to keep the peace) but to use that as the blueprint for success will only keep sexism alive. It’s a book about bending to the patriarchy when what’s needed is a feminine-centric approach. One that glorifies and empowers femininity (in all its forms). We should be talking about placing higher values on stereotypically feminine things…like motherhood. Give me dialogue on how to champion that role, not how to hide it (builds resilience, teaches communication with difficult and varied temperaments, forces new perspectives, usually involves management skills, cultivates patience). Let’s talk about the value of softeners in communication, instead of demonizing it because it sounds too female. Let’s talk diversity and the bottom line, or better yet - the pitfalls of a monoculture!! We have to make the obvious case that being female is valuable and that’s the toolkit I want in my back pocket. Moreover, pitting women against each other with labels such as the “Queen of Hearts” dodges the problem once again. While these characteristics may be real, and something to navigate, it does us all a disservice to ignore why we got that way in the first place. That discussion should be directed towards how we can identify those things within ourselves, and how we can see personally what we’re doing to keep other women down. The authors approach to this is shameful and competitive (here’s how to deal with these awful women!) where she had the opportunity to be introspective and healing. I recognize the point of this book wasn’t to upend sexism, but to promote sexist techniques as a path to “success”, and then market that to women, is also the problem.