The book was thorough and enjoyable, I would recommend. This review is more a review of Bob Hawke than the actual book. I got used to the author's narration but he doesn't have a great voice. Let's leave it at that.
Bob Hawke is undoubtedly an impressive character, although I come away from this book not having a particularly great impression of him. He is obviously a complex character. It's often easy to evaluate the leaders of the past as either good or bad but the ones who really are impressive with long lasting legacies, are often far more deep than a black and white picture and thus harder to evaluate. Justininan im thinking of you.
Before listening to this book, pretty much all I knew about Hawke was that he's that guy that everyone likes cus he was good at drinking, so much so that he got a world record for sculling beer. Everyone likes him for that and he's got that mural up on the side of that Newtown pub and a brand of beer to go with it.
In terms of his policy I can agree with most of it without being particularly versed in it. And it overall wasn't the focus of the book. I come away from this thinking that Hawke and Keating very much set Australia up in a lot of ways notability Medicare but I already knew this. I did not however realise just how long he served or favourably he was seen by the general public. I don't know enough about the economy to comment intelligently on how Hawke performed on it and running the show, but it seems as if he did a good job overall. I interpret his refusal to step down to Keating to him having a feeling of; im still popular there's no issues here, i've done a good job so why not ride the wave and see how far I can get before I have to pass things on.
However on a personal level I don't think all that crash hot. He runs around like he's some kind of medieval prince having hoes lined up in every city he goes to. Throughout his whole life he is incessantly having affairs even into his old age basically up until his death (unless I've missed something). Hawkes treatment of his wife Hazel is deplorable, he found an angel and behaved awfully towards her, it's disgusting. His complete disregard of her and how she managed his household is insulting. And made far worse by how boisterous he is - in what I will not go as far as calling neglect but it is not far off. His overall treatment of her is repugnant and showcases other unsavory character traits namely his abusive tendencies.
The figure who comes up as a point of comparison is Friedrich II (the Sicilian not the Prussian one). Who I do have a favourable opinion of although I believe there is also a lot of slutting about there as well. But I can far more easily overlook that as it's a different time period and sort just what you expect of the medieval era. I am left thinking that is just always the way that the rich and powerful have always and will always behave.
He has some strange habits, starting with his let's say exhibitionist tendencies which are just really strange. There were countless examples of him inviting some reporter over or a colleague to have a meeting at his house and then greets them naked, then proceeds to prance about naked in front of them and be I assume willfully oblivious to their discomfort. He's very touchy, always wanting to go up and touch people when he's talking to them. And he has a tendency to break down into tears in public, when he is passionately sad about an issue, which happened a few times, I'm sure would have been seen as even stranger back in the day, but if anything it seems to have contributed to his popularity
Hawke is constantly described as a larrikin which I concede he is the quintessential image of in the popular imagination. He has an image of being genuine and cutting through the bullshit, which obviously contributed to his popularity.
In his early life, well before being PM. His primary side hustle was suing people for defamation primarily as a means of income, not because he felt particularly insulted. Which is as hilarious as it is awful.
Hawke is someone who should have been knocked down a few pegs far more times in his early life. Pretty much everything goes right from him he, doesn't have any rags to prominence story, any traumatic backstory, any real struggles to overcome, aside from his older brother dying while he was a kid and I guess alcoholism and sex addiction, and his relationship breakdowns (Keating and Hazel), but that's literally it. He’s always liked, he’s always loved, always seen as special, always lands on his feet, never has to work particularly hard at anything, not that he didn't work hard but that he didn't need to to get his way. He comes from a comfortable and functional middle class family. Everything goes well for him for his whole life. Basically waltzes into politics and decides that if he is going to run for parliament he has to be PM. And everyone expected that of him anyway. For years before he entered parliament he was seen as a favorite to be future PM. His parents constantly treated him as someone who would be destined for great things and the theme of divine providence is prominent throughout this book. His mother in particular always expected him to be PM from a very young age.
I'm not embarrassed to admit that I'm envious of him. Almost everything goes perfectly for him, his first marriage falls apart and he had a rocky relationship with his kids at times but that was entirely his fault and is easily ignored when you look at the rest of his life. It annoys me that everything was easy for him. He had a very easy life. It's not that things were handed to him per se but everything comes to him - he's magnetic - in both fortune and personality. He's apparently endlessly charming, highly liked; by men cus of his drinking prowess and ability to have a chat with anyone at the pub, and highly liked by women cus he's charismatic I guess, and apparently had a lot of sex appeal. I don't see it. He clearly has an ago and a lot of hubris, as a result of too many people telling him that he was special for too long. He is egotistical at times but somehow he comes off as grounded in his day to day interactions, idk how, he's just that talented apparently.
For all these reasons I don’t like him. He's too much of a superman type figure who I specifically find to be unrelatable, who I can't connect with him at all. He just doesn't fit my character archetype. Take say, Manuel Palaiologos who I found to be instantly more relatable and far more inline with how I see myself. Hawke is too popular, and too likeable. I also admittedly have a propensity to be automatically suspicious of things that are popular and have a habit of going against the grain with these things.
Throughout the book a few people cite him as one of the best prime ministers Australia has had. I guess I agree, medicare is pretty cool, sucked in America. But I don't know anywhere near enough to make that call. I do currently tend to agree with the sentiment also mentioned that Australia has not had a lot of not very talented leaders.
Even in his death Hawke is still being hyped up.
This reads like I'm such an incel, complaining about how he's popular and special, which is not my intention - I don't think it's unfair to say that Bob Hawke, objectively, had an easier life than most.
There is an interesting anecdote in this book about how in his youth Hawke beat up a jewish kid and was deeply repentant over it which later led to his vehement support for Israel in life. I don't judge Hawke for making this kind of fuck up and then trying to correct it. I think it does speak to his character that he is able to realise his mistakes and then strive to make up for it, and you have to respect him for that.
Thoughts of on some of the people involved:
Keating has a foul temper, is an overly arrogant and ambitious arse who walks around with an aura of superiority and an absolutely wicked tongue (which often leads to amusing quips). If he didn't choose politics I could see him as a comedian. He also comes off as very similar to Bob as they both have an aura of knowing their worth even if they both have an inflated sense of self importance and an attitude of not settling for less what they feel they deserve. So it makes sense that they fell out, predictable even.
Frazer comes off as just utterly incompetent and out of his depth. A little bit of Joe Biden, if I do say so, but he was PM for quite a while. Astoundingly.
One of the most likeable people in this story is Hayden who wrote a number of amusing correspondences with the queen, which you can clearly tell he thoroughly enjoyed writing. He strikes me as someone who had ambition for the top, failed not really completely of his own fault, but then someone who was later able to reconcile with his place in history and settle for governor general after his time in the sun had passed.
TLDR: pretty good book, Hawke pretty good PM, not that great of a bloke despite his common perception.